Safety zone for surgical procedures for the prevention of neurovascular injury in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty

Authors

  • Hyon-U Pak Clinical Orthopaedic Institute, Pyongyang University of Medical Sciences, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea; Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9237-0747
  • Kang-Chol Ri Anatomy Laboratory, Pyongyang University of Medical Sciences, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
  • Tae-Hyok Choe Clinical Orthopaedic Institute, Pyongyang University of Medical Sciences, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
  • Chol-Jin Pak Clinical Orthopaedic Institute, Pyongyang University of Medical Sciences, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
  • Won-Jin Ri Clinical Orthopaedic Institute, Pyongyang University of Medical Sciences, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2025.3.5

Keywords:

femoral artery, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty obturator nerve, piriformis muscle, sciatic nerve

Abstract

Introduction and aim. With the development of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), decreased incision size produces limited visualization leading to an increased risk of adjacent neurovascular structures during the procedure.The aim was to identify the safest zones of surgical procedures for the prevention of major neurovascular structures around the acetabulum.

Material and methods. 84 cadaver pelvic specimens with 168 hips were used to analyze the anatomic relationship between the sciatic nerve and the piriformis muscle in the normal Korean population according to sex and height. We performed a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the anatomic relationship between the acetabulum and the sciatic nerve, based on the clockwise direction method, to identify the safety zones of the surgical procedure’s proximity to the acetabulum.

Results. The prevalence of type I (normal type) was more than 79% and 88% in males and females, respectively. Distances A, B and E were 7.1±0.78 mm between the 3 and 4 o’clock position, 14.2±0.67 mm between the 8 and 9 o’clock position, 17.0±1.22 mm in the 9 o’clock position, respectively, on the left side, whereas 6.0±0.69 mm between the 8 and 9 o’clock position, 14.8±0.59 mm in the 7 o’clock position, 17.9±1.08 mm in the 3 o’clock position on the right side. The proximity of the retractors to acetabulum should be placed with careful and proper retraction between the 3 and 5 o’clock position on the left side and between the 7 and 9 o’clock position on the right side, in which the placement in the 9 and 3 o’clock position should be cautious on the right and left side, respectively. The cautious use of electrocautery between the 3 and 5 o’clock position on the left side, and between the 7 and 9 o’clock position on the right side, is recommended. However, performing the electrocauterization in the 9 o’clock and 3 o’clock position respectively on the left and right side should be avoided. It is forbidden between the 10 and 12 on the left side and between 12 and 2 o’clock position on the right side. The absolute safety zones for the placement of the transacetabular screw were between 1 and 3, and between the position 5 and the 6 o’clock position on the left side and between the position 9 and 11, and between the 6 and 7 on the right side. Relative safe zones were between 12 and 1, and between the 6 and 7 o’clock position on the left and between the 11 and 12, and between the 5 and 6 o’clock positions on the right side. Screws with a length of <24mm could be safely inserted between the 3 and 5 o’clock position on the left side and between the 7 and 9 o’clock position on the right side. The risk zones were between 7 and 9, and between the 9 and 12 hours on the left side, and between 3 and 5, and between the 12 and 3 o’clock position on the right side. In cases with highly elevated trochanter major, the distances between the acetabulum and adjacent neurovascular structures changed and the risk of the SN increased.

Conclusion. These data could be helpful for arthroplasty surgeons in avoiding neurovascular injuries in MIS THA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart DJ, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage. J Bone Joint Surg. 2011;93:1392-1398. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00557

Goosen JHM, Kollen BJ, Castelein RM, et al. Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty. A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:200-208. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1331-7

van Oldenrijk J, Hoogland PV, Tuijthof GJ, et al. Soft tissue damage after minimally invasive THA. A comparison of 5 approaches. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:696. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.537804

Foucher KC, Wimmer MA, Moisio KC, et al. Time course and extent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches-a randomized controlled trial. J Biomech. 2011;44:372. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.026

Paluvadi S, Lal H, Mittal D, et al. Management of fractures of the distal third tibia by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: a prospective series of 50 patients. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2014;5(3):129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2014.07.010

Kesemenli CC, Memisogu K, Atmaca H. A minimally invasive technique for the reduction of calcaneal fractures using the Endobutton ® . J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52:215. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.11.007

Healy WL, Iorio R, Clair AJ, et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: standardized list, definitions, and stratification developed by The Hip Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:357-364. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4803-6

Shubert D, Madoff S, Milillo R, Nandi S. Neurovascular structure proximity to acetabular retractors in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:145. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.08.024

Beksaç BP, Della Valle AG, Salvati EA. Acute sciatic nerve palsy as a delayed complication of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009;38:E28.

Sharma DK, Kumar N, Mishra V, Howell FR. Vascular injuries in total hip replacement arthroplasty: a review of the problem. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2003;32:487.

Cook RE, Keating JF, Gillespie I. The role of angiography in the management of haemorrhage from major fractures of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(2):178-182.

Grob K, Manestar M, Ackland T, et al. Potential risk to the superior gluteal nerve during the anterior approach to the hip joint: an anatomic study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2015;97:1426. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00146

Nachbur B, Meyer RP, Verkkala K, Zürcher R. The mechanisms of severe arterial injury in surgery of the hip joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:122-133.

Oneill PA, Sclafani S, et al. Angiographic findings in pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop. 1996;329:60-67.

Abularrage CJ, Weiswasser JM, Dezee KJ, et al. Predictors of lower extremity arterial injury after total knee or total hip arthroplasty. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:803.

Goetz MB, Seybold D, Gossé F, et al. The risk of nerve lesions in hip alloarthroplasty. Z Orthop Unfall. 2010;148:163. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1240961

Wasielewski RC, Cooperstein LA, Kruger MP, Rubash HE. Acetabular anatomy and the transacetabular fixation of screws in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:501.

Beaton LE, Anson BJ. The relation of the sciatic nerve and its subdivisions to the piriformis muscle. Anat Rec. 1937;70:1-5. doi: 10.1002/ar.1090700102

Wang TI, Chen HY, Tsai CH, Hsu HC, Lin TL. Distances between bony landmarks and adjacent nerves: anatomical factors that may influence retractor placement in total hip replacement surgery. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11:31. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0365-2

Ohashi H, Kikuchi S, Aota S, Hakozaki M, Konno S. Surgical anatomy of the pelvic vasculature, with particular reference to acetabular screw fixation in cementless total hip arthroplasty in Asian population. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017;25(1):2309499016685520. doi: 10.1177/2309499016685520

Pokorny D, Jahoda D, Veigl D, Pinskerova V, Sosna A. Topographic variations of the relationship of the sciatic nerve and the piriformis muscle and its relevance to palsy after total hip arthroplasty. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006;28(1):88-91. doi: 10.1007/s00276-005-0056-x

Tomaszewski KA, Graves MJ, Henry BM, et al. Surgical anatomy of the sciatic nerve: A meta-analysis. J Orthop Res. 2016;34(10):1820-1827. doi: 10.1002/jor.23186

Vanja V, Lutz AM, Beaulieu CF, et al. Detection and prevalence of variant sciatic nerve anatomy in relation to the piriformis muscle on MRI. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46:751-757. doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2597-6

Jacomo AL, Martinez CA, Saleh SO, et al. Unusual Relationship between the Piriform Muscle and Sciatic, Inferior Gluteal and Posterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerves. Int J Morphol. 2014;32(2):432-434. doi: 10.4067/S0717-95022014000200008

Natsis K, Totlis T, Konstantinidis GA, Paraskevas G, et al. Anatomic variations between the sciatic nerve and the piriformis muscle: a contribution to surgical anatomy in piriformis syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(3):273-280. doi: 10.1007/s00276-013-1180-7

Stacey M. Cornelson, Norman W. Kettner. Unusual Anatomic Split with Reunification of the Mid-Thigh Sciatic Nerve Utilizing Sonography. SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine. 2019;1:737-741. doi: 10.1007/s42399-019-00121-1

Apaydin N, Kendir S, Tubbs RS, et al. Surgical Anatomy of the Superior Gluteal Nerve and Landmarks for Its Localization During Minimally Invasive Approaches to the Hip. Clinical Anatomy. 2013;26:614-620. doi: 10.1002/ca.22057

Schmalzried TP, Amstutz HC, Dorey FJ. Nerve palsy associated with total hip replacement: risk factors and prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991;73A:1074.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Pak, H.-U., Ri, K.-C., Choe, T.-H., Pak, C.-J., & Ri, W.-J. (2025). Safety zone for surgical procedures for the prevention of neurovascular injury in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 23(3), 562–569. https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2025.3.5

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL PAPERS