Implications of labor analgesia on labor outcomes – a systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2025.2.18

Keywords:

epidural analgesia, labor analgesia, maternal outcomes, newborn outcomes, patient satisfaction

Abstract

Introduction and aim. Labor analgesia is a key component in ensuring maternal comfort during childbirth and impacts several maternal and neonatal outcomes. The selection of pharmacological and nonpharmacological analgesic methods significantly affects labor progression, delivery methods, neonatal health, and maternal satisfaction. This systematic review sought to assess the implications of labor analgesia on these outcomes by synthesizing evidence from various study designs.

Material and methods. Searches on the following electronic databases comprehensively: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL; Using Boolean operators and MeSH terms, six studies were included. These comprised randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and observational studies that assessed maternal and newborn outcomes in the presence of labor analgesia. Data on types of analgesia, onset times, maternal hemodynamic outcomes, labor durations, delivery modes, neonatal Apgar scores, adverse events and maternal satisfaction were extracted. The exclusion criteria were studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria, such as reviews, editorials, and non-human studies.

Analysis of the literature. The analysis involved a wide range of studies employing analgesia methods such as epidural, com bined spinal-epidural (CSE), programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB), and non-pharmacological interventions. Ropiva caine (0.1–0.2%) with fentanyl (7.5–25 µg/mL) was the most commonly used combination. The onset times ranged from imme diate to 200 minutes for prolonged durations of PIEB. Labor durations were variable. Some techniques, such as peripheral nerve blocks, reduced second stage labor by 33.8 minutes, whereas epidural analgesia prolonged labor duration in some cohorts. The modes of delivery outcomes were characterized by relatively minimal variations in cesarean rates between techniques, while operative vaginal deliveries were more likely with routine epidurals. Neonatal outcomes were otherwise favorable with nor mal Apgar scores, although some studies reported lower 1 minute Apgar scores with epidurals. Adverse events, such as motor blockade and postdural puncture headaches, were usually technique-dependent and minimal. Maternal satisfaction was high in all methods, with ultrasound-guided CSE, PIEB, and nonpharmacological methods receiving particularly positive feedback.

Conclusion. Labor analgesia showed overall safety and efficacy but varied impacts on labor duration, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes with the technique used. Although most of them had high maternal satisfaction and stable maternal he modynamics, some increased operative deliveries or adverse newborn outcomes. These results underscore the importance of tailoring analgesic strategies to individual clinical needs to optimize maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Callahan EC, Lee W, Aleshi P, George RB. Modern labor epidural analgesia: implications for labour outcomes and maternal-fetal health. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5):S1260-S1269. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.017

Nanji, JA, Carvalho, B. Pain management during labor and vaginal birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;67:100-112. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.03.002

Kearns RJ, Kyzayeva A, Halliday LOE, Lawlor DA, Shaw M, Nelson SM. Epidural analgesia during labour and severe maternal morbidity: population-based study. BMJ. 2024;385:e077190. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077190

Mazda Y. Labour neuraxial analgesia and clinical outcomes. J Anesth. 2022;36(4):453-455. doi: 10.1007/s00540-022-03043-w

Kearns RJ, Lucas DN. Neuraxial analgesia in labour and the foetus. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2023;37(1):73-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2023.02.005

Roofthooft E, Filetici N, Van Houwe M, et al. High-volume patient-controlled epidural vs programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled study. Anaesthesia. 2023;78(9):1129-1138. doi: 10.1111/anae.16060

Russell R. Preeclampsia and the anaesthesiologist: current management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020;33(3):305-310. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000835

Mori Y, Toyama S, Sato M, Yamashita Y, Suzuki Y, Sago H. Influence of preterm labour epidural analgesia on neonatal and maternal outcomes: a single-centre retrospective study. Br J Anaesth. 2021;127(5):e154-e156. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.07.017

Lawson J, Amaratunge L, Goh M, Selvaratnam RJ. Perinatal outcomes after regional analgesia during labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024;64(4):334-340. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13797

Liu ZH, Wang DX. Potential impact of epidural labour analgesia on the outcomes of neonates and children. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(19):2353-2358. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000900

Patel S, Ciechanowicz S, Blumenfeld YJ, Sultan P. Epidural-related maternal fever: incidence, pathophysiology, outcomes, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5):S1283-S1304.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.026

Shuai F, Jia J, Lin P. Effects of using epidural analgesia during delivery on maternal and infant outcomes. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2022;87(1):46-53. doi: 10.1159/000522330

Goetzl L. Maternal fever in labour: etiologies, consequences, and clinical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5):S1274-S1282. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.002

Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160

Igelström E, Campbell M, Craig P, Katikireddi SV. Cochrane’s risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) is frequently misapplied: a methodological systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;140:22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.022

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898

Bae J, Kim Y, Yoo S, Kim JT, Park SK. Handheld ultrasound-assisted versus palpation-guided combined spinal-epidural for labour analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):23009. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50407-7

Bullingham A, Liang S, Edmonds E, Mathur S, Sharma S. Continuous epidural infusion vs programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labour analgesia: a prospective, controlled, before-and-after cohort study of labour outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(2):432-437. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.038

Cahill AG, Srinivas SK, Tita ATN, et al. Effect of immediate vs delayed pushing on rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery among nulliparous women receiving neuraxial analgesia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(14):1444-1454. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13986

Gallo RBS, Santana LS, Marcolin AC, Duarte G, Quintana SM. Sequential application of non-pharmacological interventions reduces the severity of labour pain, delays use of pharmacological analgesia, and improves some obstetric outcomes: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2018;64(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.11.014

Hincz P, Podciechowski L, Grzesiak M, Horzelski W, Wilczyński J. Epidural analgesia during labour: a retrospective cohort study on its effects on labour, delivery, and neonatal outcome. Ginekol Pol. 2014;85(12):923-928.

Hung T-H, Hsieh T-T, Liu H-P. Differential effects of epidural analgesia on modes of delivery and perinatal outcomes between nulliparous and multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120907

Kim D, Kim J, Choo H, Choi DH. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus as an ideal method for labour analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024;77(1):106-114. doi: 10.4097/kja.23173

Sharawi N, Williams M, Athar W, et al. Effect of dural-puncture epidural vs standard epidural for epidural extension on onset time of surgical anesthesia in elective cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(8):e2326710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26710

Singh SKSC, Yahya N, Misiran K, Masdar A, Nor NM, Yee LC. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2016;66(3):259-264. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.09.006

Tan HS, Reed SE, Mehdiratta JE, et al. Quality of labour analgesia with dural puncture epidural versus standard epidural technique in obese parturients: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2022;136(5):678-687. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004137

Wassen MM, Smits LJ, Scheepers HC, et al. Routine labour epidural analgesia versus labour analgesia on request: a randomised non-inferiority trial. BJOG. 2015;122(3):344-350. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12854

Xu J, Zhou R, Su W, et al. Ultrasound-guided bilateral pudendal nerve blocks of nulliparous women with epidural labour analgesia in the second stage of labour: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e035887. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035887

Tan HS, Zeng Y, Qi Y, et al. Automated mandatory bolus versus basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;6(6):CD011344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011344.pub3

Silverman M, Zwolinski N, Wang E, et al. Regional analgesia for cesarean delivery: a narrative review toward enhancing outcomes in parturients. J Pain Res. 2023;16:3807-3835. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S428332

Heesen P, Halpern SH, Beilin Y, et al. Labour neuraxial analgesia and breastfeeding: an updated systematic review. J Clin Anesth. 2021;68:110105. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110105

Chen X, Zhang Y, Ni X, Liu Z. Effects of labour analgesia with different concentrations of ropivacaine on maternal body temperature and inflammatory factor: a randomised controlled study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022;41(2):101030. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101030

Haidl F, Tronstad C, Rosseland LA, Dahl V. Maternal haemodynamics during labour epidural analgesia with and without adrenaline. Scand J Pain. 2021;21(4):680-687. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0176

Vilkko R, Räisänen S, Gissler M, et al. Busy day effect on the use of obstetrical interventions and epidural analgesia during labour: a cross-sectional register study of 601,247 deliveries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04798-6

Yu K, Ding Z, Yang J, et al. Bibliometric analysis on global analgesia in labour from 2002 to 2021. J Pain Res. 2023;16:1999-2013. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S416142

Liu LY, Lange EMS, Yee LM. Association between maternal neuraxial analgesia and neonatal outcomes in very preterm infants. AJP Rep. 2023;13(4):e65-e70. Doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776147

Halliday L, Nelson SM, Kearns RJ. Epidural analgesia in labour: a narrative review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(2):356-364. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14175

de Verastegui-Martín M, de Paz-Fresneda A, Jiménez-Barbero JA, et al. Influence of labouring people’s mobility and positional changes on birth outcomes in low-dose epidural analgesia labour: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023;68(1):84-98. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13446

Guasch E, Brogly N, Gilsanz F. Combined spinal epidural for labour analgesia and caesarean section: indications and recommendations. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020;33(3):284-290. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000866

Lu R, Rong L, Ye L, Xu Y, Wu H. Effects of epidural analgesia on intrapartum maternal fever and maternal outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024;37(1):2357168. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2357168

Liu ZH, Wang DX. Potential impact of epidural labour analgesia on the outcomes of neonates and children. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(19):2353-2358. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000900

Callahan EC, Lee W, Aleshi P, George RB. Modern labour epidural analgesia: implications for labour outcomes and maternal-fetal health. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5):S1260-S1269. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.017

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Tehalia, M. K., Agarwal, S., & Lalwani, A. (2025). Implications of labor analgesia on labor outcomes – a systematic review. European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 23(2), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2025.2.18

Issue

Section

REVIEW PAPERS