The influence of ODM technique on the radiation dose received by patients during head CT scan

Authors

  • Joanna Sobczyk Department of Electroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3589-8247
  • Aleksandra Pusz-Sapa Department of Electroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland; Clinical Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, Regional Hospital No.2 in Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3365-3289
  • Aneta Wojtasik Department of Electroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland; Clinical Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, Regional Hospital No.2 in Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5087-6279
  • Greta Gaweł Department of Electroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland; Clinical Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, Podkarpackie Oncology Centre Regional Hospital No.1 in Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-1613
  • Adrian Truszkiewicz Department of Electroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland; Center for Innovative Research in Medical and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5762-0492
  • Wiesław Guz Department of Electroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland; Clinical Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, Regional Hospital No.2 in Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland; Center for Innovative Research in Medical and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1309-5374

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2018.3.4

Keywords:

organ dose modulation, computed tomography, protection against ionizing radiation

Abstract

Introduction. Computed tomography (CT) is inexpensive radiological examination of high diagnostic effectiveness. However, common use of CT tests has led to increased exposure to ionizing radiation in the population.

Aim. To assess the effect of organ dose modulation (ODM) technique on the radiation dose received by patients during head CT scan.

Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of 120 tests in two groups of patients who had CT scans without and with ODM. Every group consisted of 60 people (30 women and 30 men in each). The ability to perform tests in two algorithms (without and with ODM) resulted from the fact that after installing the apparatus, tests were carried out using standard technique, and only then the ODM function was launched.

Results. We found that during examinations with ODM, patients received a reduced dose of ionizing radiation. The mean DLP value with ODM is 9.4% lower than the mean DLP value without ODM by comparing the tests with and without contrasting agent. The mean DLP value obtained in men using ODM was 11.9% lower than the mean dose without ODM, and in women this difference was 6.6%.

Conclusion. The mean DLP value received by men with ODM was by 11.9% lower than the mean dose without ODM, and in women this difference was 6.6%. Patients receive a lower dose both in tests with and without a contrasting agent compared to the tests where ODM was not used. A statistical significance of the obtained results was found.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. Radiol. 2007;4:273.

Mettler FA Jr. Magnitude of radiation uses and doses in the United States: NCRP scientific committee 6-2 analysis of medical exposures. Forty-third NCRP annual meeting program. National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements. Arlington, Virginia; 2007:9–10.

Opielak G, Dworzański W, Piotrkowicz J, Szeszko Ł, Tsyganok M. Tomografia komputerowa głowy w codziennej diagnostyce. Med Rodz. 2012;4:62-64.

Approcci alla riduzione della dose in Computed Tomography. X-CARE– Organ Based dose Modulation Website. https://www.healthcare.siemens.it/medical-imaging/low-dose/low-dose-information-by-modality/low-dose-in-computed-tomography. Accesed May 10, 2018.

Akata D, Karaosmanoglu AD, Özman MN, Brkljacic B, Onur MR. Time is Ripe! How to keep up with new technologies for radiation dose optimisation and find ways to incorporate these new developments in radiology equipment renewal. EuroSafe Imaging Website. http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/esi2016/ESI-0021. Accessed May 10, 2018.

Polska na 36. miejscu pod względem wydatków na ochronę zdrowia – najnowszy raport OECD 05 listopada 2015. Polityka Zdrowotna Website. http://www.politykazdrowotna.com/tag/oecd. Accessed May 10, 2018.

Berrington de González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet. 2004;363:345–351.

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284.

Mettler FA, Thomadsen BR, Bhargavan M, et al. Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: preliminary results. Health Phys. 2008;95:502–507.

Deak DD, Smal Y, Kalender WA. Multisection CT Protocols: Sex- and Age-specific Conversion Factors Used to Determine Effective Dose from Dose-Length Product. Radiology. 2010;257(1):163.

Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289–296.

Khursheed A, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC, Wall BF. Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. Br J Radiol. 2002;75:819–830.

Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:887-892.

Caolili EM, Cohan R, Ellis JH. Decyzje medyczne dotyczące obliczonej dawki promieniowania tomograficznego i związanego ryzyka: perspektywa pacjenta. Arch Int Med. 2009;169(11):1069-1071.

Shyu JY, Sodickson AD. Communicating radiation risk to patients and referring physicians in the emergency department setting. Br J Radiol. 2016:89.

Goldberg J, McClaine RJ, Cook B, et al. Use of a mild traumatic brain injury gideline to reduce inpatient hospital imaging and charges. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(9):1777–1783.

Merry G. Breast cancer risks from medical imaging computed tomography and nuclear medicine among females enrolled in a large integrated health care system. Radiological Society of North America Website. http://archive.rsna.org/2012/12035878.html. Accessed May 10, 2018.

Ainsbury EA, Bouffler S, Dorr W, et al. Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies. Radiat Res. 2009;172(1):1–9.

Shore RE, Neriishi K, Nakashima E. Epidemiological Studies of Cataract Risk at Low to Moderate Radiation Doses: (Not) Seeing is Believing. Radiat Res. 2010;174(6):889–894.

Domienik J, Zmyślony M. Ocena dawek otrzymywanych przez pacjentów poddanych badaniom tomografii komputerowej. Med Pr. 2012;63(6):629–635.

Nikupaavo U, Kaasalainen T, Reijonen V, Ahenen SM, Kortesniemi M. Lens Dose in Routine Head CT: Comparison of Different Optimization Methods With Anthropomorphic Phantoms. Med Phys Inform. 2015;204:117–123.

Tian X, Li X, Segars WP, Paulson EK, Frush DP, Samei E. Pediatric Chest and Abdominopelvic CT: Organ Dose Estimation Based on 42 Patient Models. Radiology. 2014;270(2):535–547.

Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation Dose Associated With Common Computed Tomography Examinations and the Associated Lifetime Attributable Risk of Cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2078-2086.

McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;47:27–40.

Xinhui D, WangJ, Christner JA, Leng S, Grant KL, McCollough CH. Dose Reduction to Anterior Surfaces With Organ-Based Tube-Current Modulation: Evaluation of Performance in a Phantom Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:689-695.

Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA, Leng S, Grant KL, McCollough CM. Bismuth Shielding, Organ-based Tube Current Modulation, and Global Reduction of Tube Current for Dose Reduction to the Eye at Head CT. Radiology. 2012;262(1):191-198.

Gandhi D, Crotty DJ, Stevens GM, Schmidt TG. Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique. Med Phys. 2015;42(11):6572-6578.

Dixon MT, Loader RJ, Stevens GC, Rowles NP. An evaluation of organ dose modulation on a GE optima CT660-computed tomography scanner. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;3:380.

Revolution CT Podręcznik użytkownika. Wyd. GE; 2014:259-260.

Zdrojewicz Z, Szlagor A, Wielogórska M, Nowakowska D, Nowakowski J.Wpływ promieniowania jonizującego na organizm człowieka. Fam Med Primary Care Rev. 2016;2(18):174–179.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-30

How to Cite

Sobczyk, J., Pusz-Sapa, A., Wojtasik, A., Gaweł, G., Truszkiewicz, A., & Guz, W. (2018). The influence of ODM technique on the radiation dose received by patients during head CT scan. European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 16(3), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2018.3.4

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL PAPERS

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>