Comparison of conventional syringe anesthesia and three computer-aided anesthesia systems (Quicksleeper, SleeperOne, and The Wand)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2022.3.4Keywords:
computerized-controlled local anesthetic delivery, conventional Syringe, local anesthesia, Quicksleeper, Sleeper- One, The WandAbstract
Introduction and aim. The purpose of this study was to compare different Computerized-Controlled Local Anesthetic Delivery (CCLAD) systems to one another in addition to the conventional syringe.
Material and method. The CCLAD systems chosen for this study are the Quicksleeper, SleeperOne, and The Wand. These are discussed in categorical objectives, including the following: duration of anesthesia, analgesic effect, locality; anxiolytic effect; advantages and disadvantages; comfort and safety of use; limitations.
Analysis of the literature. The research found that many factors influence the effectiveness of dental injections, and the CCLAD systems are designed to reduce the ones that cause negative experiences. The injection systems are unique in their descriptions but show many similarities.
Conclusion. The research concluded that each device has its advantages and disadvantages and that its efficiency depends on outlying factors, independent of the injection system used.
Downloads
References
Sovatdy S, Vorakulpipat C, Kiattavorncharoen S, Saengsirinavin C, Wongsirichat N. Inferior alveolar nerve block by intraosseous injection with Quicksleeper® at the retromolar area in mandibular third molar surgery. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018;18(6):339–347.
Beneito-Brotons R, Penarrocha-Oltra D, Ata-Ali J, Penarrocha MA. Intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: A preliminary study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(3):e426–429.
Sixou JL, Marie-Cousin A, Huet A, Hingant B, Robert JC. Pain assessment by children and adolescents during intraosseous anesthesia using a computerized system (QuicksleeperTM). Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009;19(5):360–336.
Özer S, Yaltirik M, Kirli I, Yargic I. A comparative evaluation of pain and anxiety levels in 2 different anesthesia techniques: Locoregional anesthesia using conventional syringe versus intraosseous anesthesia using a computer-controlled system (Quicksleeper). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114(5 Suppl):S132–139.
Zarei M, Ghoddusi J, Sharifi E, Forghani M, Afkhami F, Marouzi P. Comparison of the anaesthetic efficacy of and heart rate changes after periodontal ligament or intraosseous X-tip injection in mandibular molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2012;45(10):921–926.
Siwawut S, Panitvisai P. Anesthetic efficacy of intraosseous and buccal infiltration techniques: a randomized controlled crossover clinical trial. CU Dent J. 2018;41:1–12.
Sixou JL, Barbosa-Rogier ME. Efficacy of intraosseous injections of anesthetic in children and adolescents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106(2):173–178.
Sixou JL, Marie-Cousin A. Intraosseous anesthesia in children with 4 % articaine and epinephrine 1:400,000 using computer-assisted systems. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(6):477–481.
Fernandez C, Reader A, Beck M, Nusstein J. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Endod. 2005;31(7):499–503.
Nieuwenhuizen J, Hembrecht EJ, Aartman IH, Krikken J, Veerkamp JS. Comparison of two computerised anesthesia delivery systems: Pain and pain-related behaviour in children during a dental injection. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(1):9–13.
Tom K, Aps J. Intraosseous Anesthesia as a Primary Technique for Local Anesthesia in Dentistry. Clin Res Infect Dis. 2015;2(1):1012.
Kämmerer, PW, Adubae A, Buttchereit I, Thiem DGE, Daubländer M, Frerich B. Prospective clinical study comparing intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of posterior mandibular teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(3):1469–1475.
Thiem DG, Schnaith F, Van Aken CM, et al. Extraction of mandibular premolars and molars: Comparison between local infiltration via pressure syringe and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;22(3):1523–1530.
Cetkovic D, Milic M, Biocanin V, et al. Efficacy and safety of 4% articaine with epinephrine for the anterior middle superior alveolar nerve block comparing to the computer-controlled and conventional anesthetic delivery: Prospective, randomized, cross-over clinical study. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2019;76(10):1045–1053.
Jensen J, Nusstein J, Drum M, Reader A, Beck M. Anesthetic efficacy of a repeated intraosseous injection following a primary intraosseous injection. J Endod. 2018;34(2):126–130.
Bigby J, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M, Weaver J. (2006). Articaine for supplemental intraosseous anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2006;32(11):1044–1047.
Coggins R, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Meyers WJ. Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection in maxillary and mandibular teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;81(6):634–641.
Gallatin J, Reader Al, Nusstein J, Beck M, Weaver J. A comparison of two intraosseous anesthetic techniques in mandibular posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(11):1476–1484.
Nusstein J, Kennedy S, Reader A, Beck M, Weaver J. Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental X-tip intraosseous injection in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2003;29(11):724–728.
Parente SA, Anderson RW, Herman WW, Kimbrough WF, Weller RN. Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection for teeth with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 1998;24(12):826–828.
Penarrocha-Oltra D, Ata-Ali J, Oltra-Moscardo MJ., Penarrocha-Diago M, Penarrocha M. Comparative study between manual injection intraosseous anesthesia and Conventional Oral Anesthesia. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(2):e233–235.
Smaïl-Faugeron V, Muller-Bolla M, Sixou JL, Courson F. Evaluation of intraosseous computerized injection system (QuicksleeperTM) vs conventional infiltration anesthesia in paediatric oral health care: A Multicentre, single -blind, combined split-mouth and parallel-arm randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;29(5):573–584.
Collier T. Intraosseous anesthesia as a primary technique for mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018;76(7):535–537.
Hembrecht EJ, Nieuwenhuizen J, Aartman IH, Krikken J, Veerkamp JS. Pain-related behaviour in children: A randomised study during two sequential dental visits. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(1):3–8.
Campanella V, Libonati A, Nardi R, et al. Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: A cross-over study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(9):3205–3213.
Garret-Bernardin A, Cantile T, D’Antò V, et al. Pain experience and Behavior Management in Pediatric Dentistry: A comparison between traditional local anesthesia and the wand computerized delivery system. Pain Res Manag. 2017;2017:1–6.
Hao Y, Zhang Z, Meng Y. Application effect of computer-assisted local anesthesia in patient operation. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2021;2021:1–6.
Hachem CE, Kaloustian MK, Cerutti F, Chedid NR. European journal of paediatric dentistry. Metallic syringe versus electronically assisted injection system: a comparative clinical study in children. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(4):320–324.
Berrendero S, Hriptulova O, Salido MP, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Comparative study of conventional anesthesia technique versus computerized system anesthesia: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;25(4):2307–2315.
Flisfisch S, Woelber JP, Walther W. Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer- assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Heliyon. 2021;7(2):e06012.
Kuşcu ÖÖ, Akyuz S. Children’s Preferences Concerning the Physical Appearance of Dental Injectors. J Dent Child (Chic). 2006;73(2):116–121.
Marques-Ferreira M, Carrilho E, Paulo S, Carrilho T, Figueiredo JP, Macedo R. Anesthesia in dental medicine with local infiltrative anaesthetic technique versus diploe anesthesia delivery systems: Efficacy and behaviour, an experimental study. Acta Med Port. 2017;30(12):848.
Chong BS, Miller JE, Sidhu SK. alternative local anaesthetic delivery systems, devices and aids designed to minimize painful injections- a review. ENDO - Endodontic Practice Today. 2014;8(1):7–22.
Aggarwal K, Lamba AK, Faraz F, Tandon S, Makker K. Comparison of anxiety and pain perceived with conventional and computerized local anesthesia delivery systems for different stages of anesthesia delivery in maxillary and mandibular nerve blocks. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018;18(6):367.
Saoji H, Nainan MT, Nanjappa N, Khairnar MR, Hishikar M, Jadhav V. Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019;13(4):298–304.
June RM, Lewkowicz M, Milner PT, Rybak MA. Local anesthetics and advances in their administration – an overview. J Pre-Clin Clin Res. 2017;11(1):94–101.
Hannan L, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Meyers WJ. The use of ultrasound for guiding needle placement for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87(6):658–665.
Wilson S, Johns P, Fuller PM. The inferior alveolar and mylohyoid nerves: An anatomic study and relationship to local anesthesia of the anterior mandibular teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984;108(3):350–352.
Jeske AH, Boshart BF. Deflection of conventional versus nondeflect-ing dental needles in vitro. Anesth Prog. 1985;32(2):4–64.
Yesilyurt C, Bulut G, Taşdemir T. Pain perception during inferior alveolar injection administered with the wand or conventional syringe. Br Dent J. 2008;205(5):E10.
Graetz C, Fawzy-El-Sayed KM, Graetz N, Dorfer CE. Root damage induced by intraosseous anesthesia-an in vitro investigation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(1):e130–134.
Velasco I, Soto R. Anterior and middle superior alveolar nerve block for anesthesia of maxillary teeth using conventional syringe. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012;9(5):535.
Youssef BR, Söhnel A, Welk A, et al. RCT on the effectiveness of the intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block on pain during dental treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(8):4825–4832.
Woodmansey KF, White RK, He J. Osteonecrosis related to intraosseous anesthesia: Report of A case. J Endod. 2009;35(2):288–291.
Giannetti, L et al. Single tooth anesthesia: a new approach to the paediatric patient. A clinical experimental study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(1):40–43.
Yuchen H, Zheqi Z, Yan M. Application Effect of Computer-Assisted Local Anesthesia in Patient Operation. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2021;2021:8643867.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our open access policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition: this means that articles have free availability on the public Internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from having access to the Internet itself.
All articles are published with free open access under the CC-BY Creative Commons attribution license (the current version is CC-BY, version 4.0). If you submit your paper for publication by the Eur J Clin Exp Med, you agree to have the CC-BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you, as the author, agree that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that Eur J Clin Exp Med content can be mined without barriers for the research needs.
