Unveiling challenges in cadaveric dissection for medical education – a study of student perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2024.1.19Keywords:
anatomy, cadaveric dissection, medical curriculum, medical educationAbstract
Introduction and aim. Cadaveric dissection is the mainstay of learning anatomy by medical students. Even though newer teaching learning methodologies have been implemented to facilitate learning anatomy, cadaveric dissection remains the most preferred method by students. The objective of this study was to analyze the student perspective of different aspects of learning anatomy with their positive and negative experiences and to get a better understanding of their opinions and their experience.
Material and methods. In this cross-sectional study, a pretested and validated questionnaire was used to collect information from the students after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Informed consent was obtained from every student prior to their participation in the study.
Results. Three hundred seventy-seven students took part in this study and the response rate obtained was 63.5%. The majority of the students stated that cadaveric dissection has helped them in learning basic anatomy and had deepened their under standing of complexity of human body and has helped in better performance in clinical applications. The smell of formalde hyde and eye irritation was cited as the major reasons for finding dissection sessions challenging. Most of the students agreed that counselling before dissection sessions will help to alleviate the emotional reactions to cadavers.
Conclusion. The students unanimously agreed that cadaveric dissection sessions are the best way to learn basic anatomy com plemented with newer teaching tools like prosection and computer-based approaches. However, the problems encountered by the students like smell and irritation of formaldehyde need to be addressed with usage of alternative techniques.
Downloads
References
von Staden H. The discovery of the body: human dissection and its cultural contexts in ancient Greece. Yale J Biol Med. 1992;65(3):223-241.
Memon I. Cadaver Dissection Is Obsolete in Medical Training! A Misinterpreted Notion. Med Princ Pract. 2018;27(3):201-210. doi: 10.1159/000488320
Trivedi P N, Changani M V, Rathwa A J, Lakhani C J. Cadaveric dissection- An integral part of first year MBBS anatomy teaching (students' perspective). Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2018;5(2):229-232. doi: 10.18231/2394-2126.2018.0053
Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29(2):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s00276-007-0180-x
Patel SB, Mauro D, Fenn J, Sharkey DR, Jones C. Is dissection the only way to learn anatomy? Thoughts from students at a non-dissecting based medical school. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4(5):259-260. doi: 10.1007/s40037-015-0206-8
Cowan M, Arain NN, Assale TSA, Assi AH, Albar RA, Ganguly PK. Student-centered integrated anatomy resource sessions at Alfaisal University. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(5):272-275. doi: 10.1002/ase.176.
Alyafi MM, AlAmodi AA, Bernhard HJ. Juurlink, Ganguly PK. How the Dissection Laboratory Facilitates Integration of Learning: Presence of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with a Large Intracardiac Thrombus: A Rare Cadaver Finding. Int J Angiol. 2012;21(02):077-080. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315625
Huitt TW, Killins A, Brooks WS. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students’ attitudes toward teamwork. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;8(2):95-103. doi: 10.1002/ase.1460
Changmai M, Gohain K. Cadaveric Dissection and Changing Perceptions in Learning Anatomy. Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University. 2019;14(4):365. doi: 10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_49_18
Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. Student responses to the gross anatomy laboratory in a medical curriculum. Clin Anat 2001;14(3):231-236. doi: 10.1002/ca.1038
Thomas MR, Dyrbye LN, Huntington JL, et al. How Do Distress and Well-being Relate to Medical Student Empathy? A Multicenter Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(2):177-183. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0039-6
Naz S, Nazir G, Iram S, et al. Perceptions of cadaveric dissection in anatomy teaching. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC. 2011;23(3):145-148.
Granger NA. Dissection laboratory is vital to medical gross anatomy education. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2004;281B(1):6-8. doi: 10.1002/ar.b.20039
Alhassan A, Majeed S. Perception of Ghanaian Medical Students of Cadaveric Dissection in a Problem-Based Learning Curriculum. Anat Res Int. 2018;2018:1-7. doi: 10.1155/2018/3868204
Dissabandara LO, Nirthanan SN, Khoo TK, Tedman R. Role of cadaveric dissections in modern medical curricula: a study on student perceptions. Anat Cell Biol. 2015;48(3):205. doi: 10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.205
Evans EJ, Fitzgibbon GH. The dissecting room: Reactions of first year medical students. Clin Anat. 1992;5(4):311-320. doi: 10.1002/ca.980050408
Ghosh SK. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;10(3):286-299. doi: 10.1002/ase.1649
Lee YH, Lee YM, Kwon S, Park SH. Reactions of First-Year Medical Students to Cadaver Dissection and Their Perception on Learning Methods in Anatomy. Korean J Med Educ. 2011;23(4):275-283. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2011.23.4.275
Khasawneh RR. Anatomy Education of Medical Students During the COVID 19 Pandemic. International Journal of Morphology. 2021;39(5):1264-1269. doi: 10.4067/s0717-95022021000501264
Jones DG. Reassessing the importance of dissection: A critique and elaboration. Clin Anat. 1997;10(2):123-127. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2353(1997)10:2%3C123::aid-ca9%3E3.0.co;2-w
Horne DJ, Tiller JW, Eizenberg N, Tashevska M, Biddle N. Reactions of first-year medical students to their initial encounter with a cadaver in the dissecting room. Acad Med 1990;65(10):645-646. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199010000-00011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our open access policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition: this means that articles have free availability on the public Internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from having access to the Internet itself.
All articles are published with free open access under the CC-BY Creative Commons attribution license (the current version is CC-BY, version 4.0). If you submit your paper for publication by the Eur J Clin Exp Med, you agree to have the CC-BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you, as the author, agree that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that Eur J Clin Exp Med content can be mined without barriers for the research needs.
