Gait velocity as a tool for evaluating the effects of gait training in patients with chronic stroke

Authors

  • Agnieszka Guzik Institute of Physiotherapy of University of Rzeszów, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4582-4383
  • Mariusz Drużbicki Institute of Physiotherapy of University of Rzeszów, Poland; Clinical Rehabilitation Ward of Province Hospital No. 2 in Rzeszów, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4511-8419
  • Andrzej Kwolek Institute of Physiotherapy of University of Rzeszów, Poland
  • Grzegorz Przysada Institute of Physiotherapy of University of Rzeszów, Poland; Clinical Rehabilitation Ward of Province Hospital No. 2 in Rzeszów, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2356-0997
  • Agnieszka Brzozowska-Magoń Institute of Physiotherapy of University of Rzeszów, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/medrev.2016.2.4

Keywords:

stroke, gait, gait velocity, treadmill training

Abstract

Background. Gait velocity is a simple but very essential parameter which may be applied as an indicator of functional efficiency. Gait of stroke patients is characterized by reduced speed. As a result, the patients have significantly limited functioning capabilities, including walking independently outside home. The study was designed to assess selected temporal gait parameters, including gait velocity, stride velocity and swing phase velocity in patients with chronic stroke following a rehabilitation program with the use treadmill.

Material and method. The study was conducted in a group of 50 patients with hemiparesis in the late period after stroke. Temporal gait parameters such as: gait velocity, stride velocity and swing velocity were examined. Additionally, 10-metre walk test was measured. 

Results. While analyzing 10-metre walk test results it was shown that after rehabilitation gait velocity increased by an average of 0.15 m/s (p = 0.0000). Similar results were obtained in terms of gait velocity which had been assessed using a 3-dimensional gait analysis, the average gait velocity increased by 0,14m/s (p = 0.0000). Analyzing stride velocity, both the paretic and non-paretic side it was noted that after rehabilitation this particular parameter increased by an average of 0.05 m/s (p = 0.0019) and 0.06 m/s (p = 0.0052). Similar results were achieved in terms of swing velocity of the paretic side - p = 0.0017.

Conclusion. It was demonstrated that rehabilitation program with the use of treadmill enabled significant improvement in gait velocity, stride velocity and swing phase velocity in patients with chronic stroke. Gait velocity is a practical and simple tool to be applied for monitoring of progress in rehabilitation and for assessing effects of gait re-education in patients with hemiplegia in a chronic stage after stroke.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mendis S. Stroke disability and rehabilitation of stroke: World Health Organization perspective. Int J Stroke 2013;8:3–4.

Kang TW, Lee JH, Cynn HS. Six-Week Nordic Treadmill Training Compared with Treadmill Training on Balance, Gait, and Activities of Daily Living for Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;25(Suppl 4):848-56.

Charalambous CC, Bonilha HS, Kautz SA, Gregory CM, Bowden MG. Rehabilitating walking speed poststroke with treadmill-based interventions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013;27(Suppl)8:709-21.

Patterson KK, Nadkarni, NK, Black SE, McIlroy WE. Temporal gait symmetry and velocity differ in their relationship to age. Gait Posture 2012;35(Suppl 4):590–594.

Dickstein R. Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2008;22(Suppl 6):649-660.

Lamontagne A, Fung J. Faster is better: implications for speed-intensive gait training after stroke. Stroke 2004;35:2543–2548.

Lu X, Hu N, Deng S, Li J, Qi S, Bi S. The reliability, validity and correlation of two observational gait scales assessed by video tape for Chinese subjects with hemiplegia. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27(Suppl 12):3717-21.

Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S. Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Stroke 2007;38(Suppl 7):2096-2100.

Tenore N, Fortugno F, Viola F, Galli M, Giaquinto S. Gait Analysis as a Reliable Tool for Rehabilitation of Chronic Hemiplegic Patients. Clin Exp Hypertens 2006;28:349-355.

Patterson KK, Nadkarni NK, Black SE, McIlroy WE. Temporal gait symmetry and velocity differ in their relationship to age. Gait Posture 2012;35(Suppl 4):590–594.

Bohannon RW, Andrews AW, Glenney SS. Minimal clinically important difference for comfortable speed as a measure of gait performance in patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation after stroke. J Phys Ther Sci 2013; 25(Suppl 10):1223-5.

Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Penninx BW, et al. Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people--results from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53(Suppl 10):1675-80.

Fritz S, Lusardi M. White paper: “walking speed: the sixth vital sign”. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2009;32(Suppl 2):46-9.

Pang EY, Fong SS, Tse MM, Tam EW, Ng SS, So BC. Reliability and validity of the sideways step test and its correlation with motor function after stroke. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27(Suppl 6):1839-45.

von Schroeder HP, Coutts RD, Lyden PD, Billings E Jr, Nickel VL. Gait parameters following stroke: a practical assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev 1995; 32(Suppl 1):25-31.

Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC. Effect of duration of upper- and lower-extremity rehabilitation sessions and walking speed on recovery of interlimb coordination in hemiplegic gait. Phys Ther 2002;82(Suppl 5):432-48.

Bohannon RW. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20—79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing 1997;26(Suppl 1):15-9.

Ada L, Dean CM, Lindley R, Lloyd G. Improving community ambulation after stroke: the AMBULATE Trial. BMC Neurol 2009;11(Suppl 9):1-6.

Eng JJ, Tang PF. Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: A synthesis of the evidence. Expert Rev Neurother 2007;7(Suppl 10):1417–1436.

Reisman DS, McLean H, Bastian AJ. Split-belt treadmill training poststroke: a case study. J Neurol Phys Ther 2010;34(Suppl 4):202-7.

Patterson SL, Rodgers MM, Macko RF, Forrester LW. Effect of treadmill exercise training on spatial and temporal gait parameters in subjects with chronic stroke: a preliminary report. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:221–228.

Dean CM, Ada L, Bampton J, Morris ME, Katrak PH, Potts S. Treadmill walking with body weight support in subacute non-ambulatory stroke improves walking capacity more than overground walking: a randomised trial. J Physiother 2010;56(Suppl 2):97-103.

Sullivan KJ, Knowlton BJ, Dobkin BH. Step training with body weight support: effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:683-91.

Krekora K, Czernicki J. Przydatność pomiaru prędkości w monitorowaniu reedukacji chodu u chorych z niedowładem spastycznym po udarze mózgu. Balneol Pol 2009;51(Suppl 1):40-45.

Kuys SS, Brauer SG, Ada L. Higher-intensity treadmill walking during rehabilitation after stroke in feasible and not detrimental to walking pattern or quality: a pilot randomized trial. Clin Rehabil 2011;25(Suppl 4):316-26.

Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Exercise on a treadmill or walking outdoors? A randomized controlled trial comparing effectiveness of two walking exercise programmes late after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2010;24(Suppl 1):46-54.

Macko RF, Ivey FM, Forrester LW, et al. Treadmill exercise rehabilitation improves ambulatory function and cardiovascular fitness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 2005;36(Suppl 10):2206–11.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

Guzik, A., Drużbicki, M., Kwolek, A., Przysada, G., & Brzozowska-Magoń, A. (2016). Gait velocity as a tool for evaluating the effects of gait training in patients with chronic stroke. European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 14(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.15584/medrev.2016.2.4

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2016): Medical Review

Section

ORIGINAL PAPERS

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Medical Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our open access policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition: this means that articles have free availability on the public Internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from having access to the Internet itself.

All articles are published with free open access under the CC-BY Creative Commons attribution license (the current version is CC-BY, version 4.0). If you submit your paper for publication by the Eur J Clin Exp Med, you agree to have the CC-BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you, as the author, agree that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that Eur J Clin Exp Med content can be mined without barriers for the research needs.