Chosen assessment methods of physiotherapy effects in patients after cerebral stroke treated at a rehabilitation ward

Authors

  • Grzegorz Przysada Department of Medicine, Institute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Poland; Clinical Physical Therapy Ward of the Regional Hospital No. 2 in Rzeszów https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2356-0997
  • Agnieszka Guzik Department of Medicine, Institute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4582-4383
  • Andżelina Wolan-Nieroda Department of Medicine, Institute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0188-4755
  • Katarzyna Walicka-Cupryś Department of Medicine, Institute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0892-9001
  • Mariusz Drużbicki Department of Medicine, Institute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Poland; Clinical Physical Therapy Ward of the Regional Hospital No. 2 in Rzeszów

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/przmed.2015.3.2

Keywords:

cerebral stroke, patient assessment, physiotherapy effect assessment

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to assess the methods used for analyzing patient condition and physical therapy effects in a group of patients after cerebral stroke who were treated at a rehabilitation ward. We also analyzed the extent to which several assessment scales of patient condition are mutually correlated; and therefore to what extent these scales are reliable and useful in assessment of physiotherapy effects of those patients.

Material and method. The study population consisted of 1124 patients after cerebral stroke. The mean age of patients at the time of undergoing physical therapy was 64.3 years ± 12.6, while the mean time that had passed since stroke was 24.2 months. To assess patient condition we used the Brunnström approach, the Barthel ADL index and general ability and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. We set statistical significance at p>0.05. 

Results. We found that study population patients improved after physical therapy. The improvement was revealed in each of the tests of physical ability we used. We found the greatest mean value of improvement when we used the Barthel ADL index (3.25). We found no improvement in 4.6% of patients with the tests and scales we used; while in 43.4% of patients the improvement was revealed by all three kinds of physical ability measurement methods. We found a mediocre correlation of the Brunnström approach test with the two remaining tests.

Conclusions. Multi-approach and complex physical therapy, run by a team of physiotherapists, results in significant improvement of patients after cerebral stroke. The improvement was found in all physical ability measurement methods we used. The Brunnström approach, the Barthel ADL index, and the general ability test that are used for assessing patient condition of those who suffered from cerebral stroke, were mutually correlated to a mediocre extent. This proves that they measure different aspects of human health. Several different health assessment methods need to be used simultaneously, so that an objective and extensive assessment can be made of both the treatment effect and the changes in the physiotherapeutic process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Scrivener K, Schurr K, Sherrington C. Responsiveness of the ten-metre walk test, Step Test & Motor Assessment Scale in inpatient care after stroke. BMC Neurol 2014;16;14:129:1-7.

Verheijde JL, White F, Tompkins J, Dahl P, Hentz JG, Lebec MT, Cornwall M. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the lower extremity functional scale in individuals affected by stroke. PM R 2013;5(12):1019-1025.

Salter K, Jutai J, Foley N, Teasell R. Clinical Outcome Variables Scale: A retrospective validation study in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2010;42(7):609-613.

Scrivener K, Sherrington C, Schurr K. A systematic review of the responsiveness of lower limb physical performance measures in inpatient care after stroke. BMC Neurol 2013;10;13:4:1-8.

Heuschmann PU, Wiedmann S, Wellwood I. Three-month stroke outcome: The European Registers of Stroke (EROS) Investigators. Neurology 2011;76:159-165.

Sienkiewicz-Jarosz H, Gruszkiewicz M, Pniewski J, Niewada M, Członkowska A, Wolfe Ch, Ryglewicz D. Zapadalność i wskaźniki śmiertelności dla pierwszego w życiu udaru mózgu – porównanie dwóch warszawskich badań populacyjnych. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2011;45,3:207–212.

Kinlay S. Changes in Stroke Epidemiology, Prevention, and Treatment Circulation 2011;124:494-496.

Ward I, Pivko S, Brooks G, Parkin K. Validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement scale in acute rehabilitation: a comparison with the functional independence measure and stroke impact scale-16. PM R 2011;3(11):1013-1021.

Bartlova B, Nosavcovova N, Novakova M, Drilkova L, AL Fadhli AK, Anbais FH, Erajhi AA, Dunklerova L, Siegelova J. Functional evaluation of physiotherapy in patients after stroke lasting three months. Scripta Medica (Brno) 2007;80(5):197-202.

Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance. Scale in Stroke Rehabilitation: A systematic Review. Phys Ther 2008;88(5):559-566.

Tyson SF, Connell LA. How to measure balance in clinical practice. A systematic review of the psychometrics and clinical utility of measures of balance activity for neurological conditions. Clin Rehabil 2009;23(9):824-840.

Salter KL, Teasell RW, Foley NC, Jutai JW. Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86(12):1007-1012.

de Oliveira R, Cacho EW, Borges G. Post-stroke motor and functional evaluations: a clinical correlation using Fugl-Meyer assessment scale, Berg balance scale and Barthel index. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2006;64(3B):731-735.

Kabsh A. Lokomocja człowieka, [w:] „Rehabilitacja medyczna” red. Kwolek A., Wyd. Urban & Partner, Wrocław 2012; t.1:148-155.

Wren TA, Gorton GE, Ounpuu S, Tucker CA. Efficacy of clinical gait analysis: A systematic review. Gait & Posture 2011;34(2):149-153.

Przysada G, Kwolek A, Mazur A. Wpływ wybranych czynników na efekty rehabilitacji u chorych po udarze mózgu. Rehab Med 2007;11,3:29-37.

Kwolek A. Metoda kompleksowej oceny stanu chorych z niedowładem połowiczym – doświadczenia własne. Post Rehab 1997;11(3):37–46.

Kwolek A. Schorzenia i urazy mózgowia, [w:] „Rehabilitacja medyczna” pod red. Kwolek A. Wyd. Urban & Partner; Wrocław 2012; t.2:25-30.

Lee YC, Chen SS, Koh CL, Hsueh IP, Yao KP, Hsieh CL. Development of two Barthel index-based supplementary scales for patients with stroke. PLoS One 2014;20;9(10):e110494:1-8.

Sangha H, Lipson D, Foley N, Salter K, Bhogal S, Pohani G, Teasell RW. A comparison of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure as outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: patterns of disability scale usage in clinical trials. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28(2):135-139.

Quinn TJ, Langhorne P, Stott DJ. Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application. Stroke 2011;42:1146–1151.

Hsieh YW, Wang CH, Wu SC, Chen PC, Sheu CF, et al. Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:233–238.

Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging 2013;8:201-211.

Naghdi S, Ansari NN, Mansouri K, Hasson S. A neurophysiological and clinical study of Brunnstrom recovery stages in the upper limb following stroke. Brain Inj 2010;24(11):1372-1378.

Safaz I, Yilmaz B, Yaşar E, Alaca R. Brunnstrom recovery stage and motricity index for the evaluation of upper extremity in stroke: analysis for correlation and responsiveness. Int J Rehabil Res 2009;32(3):228-231.

Drużbicki M., Pacześniak-Jost A., Kwolek A. Metody klinimetryczne stosowane w rehabilitacji neurologicznej. PrzMed Uniw Rzesz 2007;3:268-274.

Kwolek A, Grochulska W, Małek A. Ocena stanu chorych z niedowładem połowiczym poudarowym i postępu usprawniania. Neur i Neurochir Pol 1986;20, 3:224-251.

Barthel DW, Mahoney FJ. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Med J 1965;14:61-65.

Brola W, Czernicki J, Węgrzyn W. Ocena porównawcza wskaźnika Barthel przez lekarza i fizjoterapeutę u pacjentów po udarze mózgu. Post. Rehab. 1997;11,3:29-35.

Brunnström S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia. J Am Phys Ther Assoc 1966;46,4:357-375.

Huang HC, Chung K, Lai D, Sung S. The Impact of Timing and Dose of Rehabilitation Delivery on Functional Recovery of Stroke Patients J Chin Med Assoc 2009;72,5:257–264.

Opara J. Klinimetria w udarach mózgu. Wyd. AWF Katowice 2010, wyd.2:7-19.

Boudewijn K, Gert K, Lindeman E. Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Review of Current Developments in Stroke Rehabilitation Research. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2006;1:75-80.

Mikołajewska E. Klinimetria w fizjoterapii pacjentów po udarze mózgu. SL 2011;3-4:77-94.

Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging 2013;8:201–211.

Opara J. Czy udar mózgu można mierzyć? Rehabilitacja w praktyce 2006;2:12-15.

Miller E. Ocena funkcjonalna skuteczności wczesnej rehabilitacji po udarze mózgu – obserwacja półroczna. Prz Med Uniw Rzesz 2007;3:205-210.

Kwolek A, Drużbicki M. Ocena symetrii obciążenia kończyn dolnych i prędkości chodu chorych po udarze mózgu rehabilitowanych szpitalnie z wykorzystaniem platformy dynamometrycznej. Prz Med Uniw Rzesz 2005;1:52-57.

Drużbicki M, Kwolek A, Opalińska I, Pacześniak-Jost A. Ocena efektów leczenia chorych z niedowładem połowiczym po udarze mózgu rehabilitowanych z wykorzystaniem rotora typu activ. Prz Med Uniw Rzesz 2008;1:42-48.

Published

2015-09-30

How to Cite

Przysada, G., Guzik, A., Wolan-Nieroda, A., Walicka-Cupryś, K., & Drużbicki, M. (2015). Chosen assessment methods of physiotherapy effects in patients after cerebral stroke treated at a rehabilitation ward. European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 13(3), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.15584/przmed.2015.3.2

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>