Case report of a patient with cerebral palsy using non-robotic equipment for re-education movements of paretic upper limb

Authors

  • Nina Sladekova Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing and Professional Health Studies, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic; Rehabilitation Centre Harmony, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
  • Jaroslav Kresanek Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing and Professional Health Studies, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Keywords:

non-robotic therapy, upper limb, cerebral palsy, hemiparesis

Abstract

Use of the equipment (non-robotic rehabilitation therapy) in adolescent patient with cerebral palsy. Impact of therapy for re-education movements of the paretic upper limb. Brief description of the equipment Armeo® re-education, efficiency and utilization. A case report of a patient with cerebral palsy – hemiparesis consisted a method of a prospective survey. The analysis of results have shown that after treatment the patient has improved the range of motion in hemiparetic upper limb and improvement in functional test of working skills and also improvement in grip ability of paretic hand. Improvement has been not only on physical, but also on mental level and we would like to emphasize the success rate of motivation of the patient in his adolescent age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Trojan S, Druga R, Pfeiffer J, Votava J. Physiology and rehabilitation of human motor. Praha, Grada Publishing, 2005, 107-114.

Kokavec M, Ziakova E. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (Diagnosis and treatment of the principles of developmental kinesiology). Bratislava, Herba, 2008, 50-51.

Ondriova I, Sinaiova A. Cerebral palsy. In Medical leaves, annex professional medical newspapers, 2009, 10.

HOCOMA. Armeo® user manual [CD-ROM], Hocoma AG, 2008.

Klobucka S, Kralovicova M, Ziakova E. A functionally robot-assisted therapy upper limb, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, 2010, 17, 164-168.

Guth A. et. al. Investigative methods in rehabilitation, Bratislava, Liecreh Guth, 2011, 335-345.

Kwakkel G. Effects of Robot - Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2008, 22, 111-121.

Colomer C, Baldoví A, Torromé S, Navarro MD, Moliner B, Ferri J, Noé E. Efficacy of Armeo® Spring during the chronic phase of stroke. Study in mild to moderate cases of hemiparesis. Neurología (English Edition) 2013, 28: 261-267.

Rudhe C, Albisser U, Starkey ML, Curt A, Bolliger M. Reliability of movement workspace measurements in a passive arm orthosis used in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2012. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3412700/ (13.12.2013)

Ladenheim B, Altenburger P, Cardinal R, Monterroso L, Dierks T, Mast J, Krebs HI. The effect of random or sequential presentation of targets during robot-assisted therapy on children. NeuroRehabilitation 2013, 33: 25-31.

Downloads

Published

2014-03-30

How to Cite

Sladekova, N., & Kresanek, J. (2014). Case report of a patient with cerebral palsy using non-robotic equipment for re-education movements of paretic upper limb. European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 12(1), 115–118. Retrieved from https://journals.ur.edu.pl/ejcem/article/view/12586