Should oophoropexy be a standard procedure after ovarian torsion in premenarchal patients? A case-based review of fixation indications and techniques

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2026.2.6

Keywords:

abdomen, acute, child, fertility, oophoropexy, ovarian torsion

Abstract

Introduction and aim. Ovarian torsion is a rare but significant cause of acute abdomen in children. Diagnosis is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms. While Doppler ultrasound is essential, it is not definitive. Laparoscopy with detorsion remains the diagnostic and therapeutic standard. For recurrent and high-risk cases, oophoropexy is considered, but there is no consensus on its indications or optimal technique. We analyze the diagnostic process, reasons for recurrence, and outcomes of different oophoropexy techniques.

Description of the case. A premenarchal girl experienced three episodes of ipsilateral ovarian torsion. After the second recurrence, she underwent laparoscopic oophoropexy via fixation posterior to the uterus to the ovarian fossa with absorbable sutures, which failed. Following a third torsion, a laparotomy with a subsequent oophoropexy to the round ligament using non-absorbable sutures achieved a long-term recurrence-free period.

Conclusion. Retorsion remains a significant risk. This case provides a unique intrapatient comparison, demonstrating that the technical approach influences the outcomes. Fixation to the abdominal wall with non-absorbable sutures proved to be superior in this scenario, preventing further recurrence. The patient's age and torsion etiology are critical in selecting a fixation method. This report highlights the potential for oophoropexy failure and offers vital technical insights, underscoring the need for further studies to standardize practices for fertility preservation.

Supporting Agencies

abdomen, acute child fertility oophoropexy ovarian torsion

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tasset J, Rosen MW, Bell S, Smith YR, Quint EH. Ovarian Torsion in Premenarchal Girls. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32(3):254-258. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2018.10.003

Bertozzi M, Magrini E, Bellucci C, Riccioni S, Appignani A. Recurrent Ipsilateral Ovarian Torsion: Case Report and Literature Review. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28(6):e197-e201. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2015.06.007

Bertozzi M, Esposito C, Vella C, et al. Pediatric Ovarian Torsion and its Recurrence: A Multicenter Study. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30(3):413-417. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2016.11.008

Alberto EC, Tashiro J, Zheng Y, et al. Variations in the management of adolescent adnexal torsion at a single institution and the creation of a unified care pathway. Pediatr Surg Int. 2021;37(1):129-135. doi:10.1007/S00383-020-04782-1

Ashwal E, Krissi H, Hiersch L, Less S, Eitan R, Peled Y. Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Ovarian Torsion in Premenarchal Girls. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28(6):526-529. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2015.03.010

Rossi BV, Ference EH, Zurakowski D, et al. The Clinical Presentation and Surgical Management of Adnexal Torsion in the Pediatric and Adolescent Population. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25(2):109-113. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2011.10.006

Tseng YC, Lee MS, Chang YJ, Wu HP. Acute abdomen in pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Neonatol. 2008;49(4):126-134. doi:10.1016/S1875-9572(08)60027-3

Wattar B, Rimmer M, Rogozinska E, Macmillian M, Khan KS, Al Wattar BH. Accuracy of imaging modalities for adnexal torsion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2021;128(1):37-44. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16371

Dragisic KG, Padilla LA, Milad MP. The accuracy of the rectovaginal examination in detecting cul-de-sac disease in patients under general anaesthesia. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(8):1712-1715. doi:10.1093/HUMREP/DEG350

Moro F, Bolomini G, Sibal M, et al. Imaging in gynecological disease (20): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(6):934-943. doi:10.1002/UOG.21981

Stranzinger E, Strouse PJ. Ultrasound of the pediatric female pelvis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2008;29(2):98-113. doi:10.1053/J.SULT.2007.12.002

Garel L, Dubais J, Grignon A, Filiatrault D, Van Vliet G. US of the pediatric female pelvis: a clinical perspective. Radiographics. 2001;21(6):1393-1407. doi:10.1148/RADIOGRAPHICS.21.6.G01NV041393

Sims MJ, Price AB, Hirsig LE, Collins HR, Hill JG, Titus MO. Pediatric Ovarian Torsion: Should You Go With the Flow? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022;38(6):E1332-E1335. doi:10.1097/PEC.0000000000002679

Childress KJ, Dietrich JE. Pediatric Ovarian Torsion. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2017;97(1):209-221. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2016.08.008

Uterine adnexal torsion: pathologic and gray-scale ultrasonographic findings - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14998184/ Accessed October 9, 2025.

Daykan Y, Bogin R, Sharvit M, et al. Ovarian size as a risk factor for recurrent adnexal torsion: Smaller is not better. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(5):745-751. doi:10.1111/JOG.14220

Geimanaite L, Trainavicius K. Pediatric ovarian torsion: Follow- up after preservation of ovarian tissue. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(7):1453-1456. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.02.004

Tamir Yaniv R, Schonmann R, Agizim R, et al. Correlation between the Length of Ovarian Ligament and Ovarian Torsion: A Prospective Study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84(1):45-49. doi:10.1159/000490664

Yagur Y, Klein A, Tiosano L, et al. Comparative outcomes of oophoropexy techniques in preventing recurrent adnexal torsion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025;312(4):1317-1325. doi:10.1007/S00404-025-08128-X/TABLES/4

Mandarano G, Parolini F, Bosisio M, et al. Primary ovarian torsion in pediatric patients: is oophoropexy still an option? A 14-year single-center experience. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2025.10.008

Hartley J, Akhtar M, Edi-Osagie E. Oophoropexy for Recurrent Ovarian Torsion. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018;2018:8784958. doi:10.1155/2018/8784958

Dicken BJ, Billmire DF. Ovarian Cyst and Tumors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2013:967-972. doi:10.1201/b13198

Abeş M, Sarihan H. Oophoropexy in children with ovarian torsion. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2004;14(3):168-171. doi:10.1055/S-2004-817887/ID/15/BIB

Hosny TA. Oophoropexy for ovarian torsion: a new easier technique. Gynecol Surg. 2017;14(1). doi:10.1186/S10397-017-1001-9

Davis AJ, Feins NR. Subsequent asynchronous torsion of normal adnexa in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1990;25(6):687-689. doi:10.1016/0022-3468(90)90365-G

Guileyardo JM. Neonatal ovarian torsion. Am J Dis Child. 1982;136(10):945-946. doi:10.1001/ARCHPEDI.1982.03970460075017

Djavadian D, Braendle W, Jaenicke F. Laparoscopic oophoropexy for the treatment of recurrent torsion of the adnexa in pregnancy: Case report and review. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(4):933-936. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.048

Tsafrir Z, Hasson J, Levin I, Solomon E, Lessing JB, Azem F. Adnexal torsion: Cystectomy and ovarian fixation are equally important in preventing recurrence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;162(2):203-205. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.027

Simsek E, Kilicdag E, Kalayci H, Yuksel Simsek S, Parlakgumus A. Repeated ovariopexy failure in recurrent adnexal torsion: Combined approach and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(2):305-308. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.044

Fuchs N, Smorgick N, Tovbin Y, et al. Oophoropexy to prevent adnexal torsion: how, when, and for whom? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(2):205-208. doi:10.1016/J.JMIG.2009.12.011

Downloads

Published

2026-03-08

How to Cite

Nogaj , Z., Januszkiewicz-Lewandowska , D., Kaźmierowska , A., Jurczok , M., Mańkowski , P., & Sosnowska-Sienkiewicz , P. (2026). Should oophoropexy be a standard procedure after ovarian torsion in premenarchal patients? A case-based review of fixation indications and techniques. European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2026.2.6

Issue

Section

CASE REPORTS