Clinical profile and predictors of mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary care center ‒ a prospective observational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2026.2.12Keywords:
emergency severity index, endoscopy, esophageal and gastric varices, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, Glasgow-Blatchford score, quick sequential organ failure assessmentAbstract
Introduction and aim. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common and potentially life-threatening emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Prospective emergency department (ED)-based data from India on factors associated with in-hospital mortality remain limited, and comparative evidence between bleeding-specific scores such as the Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) and triage systems like the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) is scarce. This study aimed to describe the clinical profile of patients presenting with UGIB and to evaluate predictors of in-hospital mortality, with a focus on comparing the prognostic performance of GBS and ESI.
Material and methods. This single-center prospective observational cohort study was conducted in the ED of a tertiary care center in North India from January 2024 to January 2025. Adult patients with clinically suspected or endoscopically confirmed UGIB were enrolled. Clinical, laboratory, and management data were recorded using a standardized form. GBS and ESI were assigned at presentation by trained clinicians prior to outcome assessment. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Predictive performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Results. Eighty-three patients with UGIB were included; 55.4% had a GBS >2. Patients with higher GBS demonstrated greater physiological derangement, increased transfusion requirements, higher incidence of shock, and significantly higher mortality (39.1% vs. 0%, p<0.001). All non-survivors were triaged as high acuity by ESI and had qSOFA ≥2 at presentation. GBS showed good discriminative ability for predicting mortality (AUROC=0.785), outperforming ESI (AUROC=0.723).
Conclusion. GBS showed good performance in predicting in-hospital mortality and may aid early ED risk stratification. However, findings should be interpreted cautiously given the single-center design and small sample size.
Downloads
References
Stanley AJ, Laine L. Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. BMJ. 2019;364. doi:10.1136/bmj.l536
Fouad TR, Abdelsameea E, Abdel‐Razek W, et al. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Egyptian patients with cirrhosis: Post‐therapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;34(9):1604-1610. doi:10.1111/jgh.14659
Perisetti A, Kopel J, Shredi A, Raghavapuram S, Tharian B, Nugent K. Prophylactic pre-esophagogastroduodenoscopy tracheal intubation in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Baylor Univ Med Cent Proc. 2019;32(1):22-25. doi:10.1080/08998280.2018.1530007
Cooper AS. Interventions for preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in people admitted to intensive care units. Crit Care Nurse. 2019;39(2):102-103. doi:10.4037/ccn2019916
Enestvedt BK, Gralnek IM, Mattek N, Lieberman DA, Eisen G. An evaluation of endoscopic indications and findings related to nonvariceal upper-GI hemorrhage in a large multicenter consortium. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(3):422-429. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.024
Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet. 2000;356(9238):1318-1321. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02816-6
Gralnek IM, Stanley AJ, Morris AJ, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021. Endoscopy. 2021;53(3):300-332. doi:10.1055/a-1369-5274
Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, et al. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2017;356:i6432. doi:10.1136/bmj.i6432
Laine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, Martel M, Leontiadis GI. ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(5):899-917. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245
Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, Fortune BE, Simonetto DA, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J. AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. doi:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000647
Bai Z, Wang R, Cheng G, Ma D, Ibrahim M, Chawla S, Qi X. Outcomes of early versus delayed endoscopy in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;33(1):e868-e876. doi:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002282
Chen PH, Chen WC, Hou MC, et al. Delayed endoscopy increases re-bleeding and mortality in patients with hematemesis and active esophageal variceal bleeding: a cohort study. J Hepatol. 2012;57(6):1207-1213. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2012.07.038
Costable NJ, Greenwald DA. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In: Geriatric Gastroenterology. 2021:1289-1304. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30192-7_47
Elmunzer BJ, Young SD, Inadomi JM, Schoenfeld P, Laine L. Systematic review of the predictors of recurrent hemorrhage after endoscopic hemostatic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(10):2625-2632. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02070.x
Sung JJ, Tsoi KK, Ma TK, Yung MY, Lau JY, Chiu PW. Causes of mortality in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective cohort study of 10,428 cases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(1):84-89. doi:10.1038/ajg.2009.507
de Franchis R, Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63(3):743-752.
Okutur SK, Alkım C, Bes C, et al. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Analysis of 230 cases. Turk J Acad Gastroenterol. 2007;6:30-36.
Shenoy V, Shah S, Kumar S, et al. A prospective cohort study of patients presenting to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2021;10(3):1431-1436. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1996_20
Raj A, Kaeley N, Prasad H, et al. Prospective observational study on clinical and epidemiological profile of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleed. BMC Emerg Med. 2023;23:107. doi:10.1186/s12873-023-00885-9
Bhattarai S. Clinical Profile and endoscopic findings in patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed attending a Tertiary Care Hospital: a descriptive cross-sectional study. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020;58(226). doi:10.31729/jnma.4967
Mahajan P, Chandail VS. Etiological and Endoscopic Profile of Middle-Aged and Elderly patients with Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India: a retrospective analysis. J Midlife Health. 2017;8(3):137-141. doi:10.4103/jmh.JMH_86_17
Parvez MN, Goenka MK, Tiwari IK, Goenka U. Spectrum of upper gastrointestinal bleed: An experience from Eastern India. J Digest Endosc. 2016;7(2):55-61. doi:10.4103/0976-5042.189146
Kaplan RC, Heckbert SR, Psaty BM. Risk factors for hospitalized upper or lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding in treated hypertensives. Prev Med. 2002;34(4):455-462. doi:10.1006/pmed.2002.1008
Tielleman T, Bujanda D, Cryer B. Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015;25(3):415-428. doi:10.1016/j.giec.2015.02.010
Kim JS, Kim BW, Kim DH, et al. Guidelines for Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. J Gastroenterol. 2020;75(6):322-332. doi:10.4166/kjg.2020.75.6.322
Boustany A, Alali AA, Almadi M, Martel M, Barkun AN. Pre-endoscopic scores predicting low-risk patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(16):5194.
Chatten K, Purssell H, Banerjee AK, Soteriadou S, Ang Y. Glasgow Blatchford Score and risk stratification in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: can we extend this to 2 for urgent outpatient management? Clin Med (Lond). 2018;18(2):118-122. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.18-2-118
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our open access policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition: this means that articles have free availability on the public Internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from having access to the Internet itself.
All articles are published with free open access under the CC-BY Creative Commons attribution license (the current version is CC-BY, version 4.0). If you submit your paper for publication by the Eur J Clin Exp Med, you agree to have the CC-BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you, as the author, agree that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that Eur J Clin Exp Med content can be mined without barriers for the research needs.
