Blurred lines or Word crimes? On cognitive linguistic contributions to the study of musical parody by ‘Weird Al’ Yankovic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2023.20.5Keywords:
humour, musical parody, incongruity, blending, frame-shiftingAbstract
The paper argues for the multiple advantages of applying cognitive linguistic concepts and frameworks to the study of basic mechanisms and conceptual, pragmatic and social aspects of musical parody a as a polyvalent, flexible, multimodal phenomenon, understood both as a musical genre which revolves around replication or imitation of pre-existing music, and as a comedic statement utilizing the latter technique. Points of convergence, and important differences, between traditional concepts offered by the most influential linguistic theories of humour, viz. Raskin’s (1985) Semantic Script Theory of Humour and Attardo & Raskin’s (1991) General Theory of Verbal Humour, are addressed, with particular emphasis on how the status and treatment of concepts of incongruity and its resolution are accommodated within the interpretative frameworks of frame- shifting (Coulson, 2001) and Blending Theory (Fauconnier & Turner, 2002). Both emerge as useful heuristics offered within the cognitive linguistic paradigm and suggested as applicable to (multimodal) humour research. These are argued to encompass and cater for both the sequential and the (predominately) non-sequential aspects of incongruity resolution (Ritchie, 2009) underlying musical parodies as sources of humorous amusement. Further motivating factors for the development and appreciation of parodies as humorous stimuli, such as the role of (word) play and listener familiarity with the borrowed music are addressed by focusing on the description of the distinctive cognitive-cultural mechanisms and goals underlying the opus of a particular artist, ‘Weird Al’ Yankovic, by applying the abovementioned concepts and interpretative frameworks to the analysis of the techniques and goals behind his use of comedy music.
Downloads
References
Apter, M. (1982). The experience of motivation: The theory of psychological reversals. Academic Press.
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humour. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Attardo, S. (2021). Humor and Cognitive Linguistics. In X. Wen., J. Taylor (Eds.) The Routledge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. (pp. 359–371). Routledge.
Attardo, S., Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 4(3), 293–347.
Barcelona, A. (2003). The case for a metonymic basis of pragmatic inferencing: Evidence from jokes and funny anecdotes. In: Panther, K. U., L. Thornburg (Eds.) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 81-102). John Benjamins.
Berger, A. (1993) An anatomy of humor. Routledge.
Brandt, L., Brandt, P. A. (2005). Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 216–249.
Brône, G. (2017). Cognitive Linguistics and humour research. In: Attardo, S. (Ed.) The Routledge handbook of language and humour. (pp. 250–266). Routledge.
Brône, G., Feyaerts, K. (2003). The cognitive linguistics of incongruity resolution: marked reference-point structures in humor. Preprint 2005, Department of Linguistics, KU Leuven.
Brône, G., Feyaerts, K. (2004). Assessing the SSTH and GTVH: A view from cognitive linguistics. Humour. International Journal of Humour Research 17(4), 361–372.
Brône, G., Feyaerts K., Veale, T. (2006). Introduction: Cognitive linguistic approaches to humour. Humour. International Journal of Humour Research. 19(3), 203–228.
Carroll, N. (2014). Humour: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford University Press.
Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge University Press.
Coulson, S., & Urbach, T. P., Kutas, M. (2006). Looking back: Joke comprehension and the space structuring model. Humor, 19(3), 229–250.
Dynel, M. (2011). Blending the incongruity-resolution model and the Conceptual Integration Theory: The case of blends in pictorial advertising. International Review of Pragmatics, 3, 59–83.
Dynel, M. (2018). Taking cognisance of cognitive linguistic research on humour. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 1–18.
Fauconnier, G., Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual bending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books
Filmore, C. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222–254.
Forabosco, G. (2008) Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4(1) / Special Issue on Humour: 45-62.
Herrero Ruiz, J. (2019). Metaphor and metonymy in jokes: Evidence from Cognitive Linguistics and frame-shifting theory. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 32(2), 650 –684.
Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. Hutchinson.
Langacker, R.W (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McGhee, P. E. (1979). Humour, Its origin and development. W. H. Freeman.
McKeague, M. (2018). The accordion is mightier than the sword: analysing the comedy music counterculture expressed through the works of ‘Weird Al’ Yankovic. Comedy Studies 9(2), 138–149.
Moreall, J. (2009). Humour as cognitive play. Journal of Literary Theory, 3(2), 241–260.
Oring, E. (1992). Jokes and their relations. The University Press of Kentucky.
Rabin, N., Yankovic, A. (2016) Weird Al: The book. Abrams Image.
Raskin, V. (1985) Semantic mechanisms of humour. D. Reidel.
Ritchie, D. L. (2005). Frame-shifting in humour and irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(4), 275–294.
Ritchie, D. L., Dyhouse, V. (2008). Hair of the frog and other empty metaphors: The play element in figurative language. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(2), 85–107.
Ritchie, G. (2009). Variants of incongruity resolution. Journal of Literary Theory, 3(2), 313–332.
Shultz (1972) The Role of incongruity and resolution in children’s appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 13, 456 – 477.
Suls, J. M (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An Information-processing analysis. In J.H Goldstein., P.E. McGhee (Eds.), The Psychology of humour (pp. 81–100). Academic Press.
Thomerson, J. P. (2017). Parody as a borrowing practice in American music 1965–2015. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Cincinnati.
Veale, T. (2004). Incongruity in humour: Root cause or epiphenomenon? Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 17(1), 419–428.
Zbikowski, L.M. (2002). Conceptualizing music: Cognitive structure, theory, and analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Studia Anglica Resoviensia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
