On the Conceptualisation of LIFE in the melodrama “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” (2008)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2022.19.1Keywords:
conceptual metaphor, life, journey, melodramaAbstract
According to Conceptual Metaphor Theory (hereafter: CMT), conceived by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson (1980), metaphors are not merely rarely occurring poetic or stylistic features of language. On the contrary, as the scholars point out, conceptual metaphors have their origins in our bodily experiences of the world around us. Hence, they are ubiquitous and have a consequently profound influence on our thoughts and actions. This paper aims to show that people, life, love, romance, birth, life stages, life goals, progress made, obstacles along the way, successes and failures, emotions experienced, as well as time, death and the afterlife are conceptualized in modalities of a SOURCE-PATH-GOAL schema, JOURNEY and MOTION IN SPACE domains in accordance with CMT. This is achieved by analysing a monomodal discourse using the Pragglejaz Group (2007) method and an online Cambridge English Dictionary. For the study, I have used a selection of monologues and dialogues of Benjamin Button, the protagonist, together with the characters who have the greatest impact on his life in the Eric Roth screenplay of a melodrama entitled: “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”, directed by D. Fincher and based on a short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald, featuring Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett.Downloads
References
Cienki, Alan, Cornelia Müller (2009) “Words, Gestures, and beyond: Forms of Multimodal Metaphor in the Use of Spoken Language.” [In:] Charles J. Forceville, Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.) Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 297–328.
Deignan, Alice (2005) Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Forceville, Charles, J. (2009) “Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research.” [In:] Charles J. Forceville, Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.) Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 19–43.
Geiger, Richard A., Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (1993) Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Grady, Joseph, E. (1997a) Foundations of Meaning. Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. Ph.D. diss., University of California at Berkley.
Grady, Joseph, E. (1997b) “THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited.” Cognitive Linguistics. Vol. 8/4; 267–90.
Grząśko, Agnieszka, Robert Kiełtyka (2021) “Verbal Duel and Flirtation from a Cognitive Perspective: A Case Study of Film Noir “The Big Sleep” (1946).” Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. Vol. 6/1; 2–38.
Hedblom, Maria M. (2015) “Choosing the Right Path: Image Schema Theory as a Foundation for Concept Invention.” Journal of Artificial General Intelligence. Vol. 6/1; 21–57.
Johnson, Mark (1987) The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis in Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kiełtyka, Robert, Grzegorz A. Kleparski (2005) “The Ups and Downs of the Great Chain of Being: The Case of Canine Zoosemy in the History of English.” SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics. Vol. 2; 22–41.
Kövecses, Zoltan (2002/2010) Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. (1st edition 2002, 2nd edition 2010). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Zoltan (2005) Metaphor in Culture, Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Zoltan (2015) Where Metaphors Come From. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Zoltan (2017) The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kövecses, Zoltan (2020) Ten Lectures on Figurative Meaning-Making: The Role of Context. Leiden: Koninklikje Brill NV.
Kövecses, Zoltan (2020) Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. (1993) “The Axiological Parameter in Preconceptual Image-schemata.” [In:] Richard Geiger, Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.) Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 307–329.
Lakoff, George, Mark Jonson (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, George (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, Mark Jonson (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: University Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, Mark Turner (1989) More Than Cool Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Langford, Barry (2005) Film Genre. Hollywood and Beyond. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Pragglejaz Group (2007) “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol. Vol 22/1; 1–39.
Ortony, Andrew (1993) Metaphor and Thought (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rouch, Daniel (2018) Event Structure Metaphors through the Body. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Williams, Linda. (1998) “Melodrama Revised.” [In:] Nick Browne (ed.) Refiguring American Film Genres. Theory and History. Berkeley: University of California Press; 42–88. Online sources
Cambridge English Dictionary available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/
Ford, Melia. Religion and End of Life Part1: How Different Religions View the End of Life, Arizona Center on Aging available at: https://uofazcenteronaging.com/care-sheet/providers/religion-and-end-life-part-1-how-different-religions-view-end-life/
Roth, Eric. (2006) The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. Based on the short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald. Paramount Pictures Inc./Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. available at: https://scripts-onscreen.com/tag/the-curious-case-of-benjamin-button-screenplay/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Studia Anglica Resoviensia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
