Dialogue in View of Human Caring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2019.16.4Keywords:
rhetoric, dialogue, care, politeness, personAbstract
This paper seeks to explore the elements for an anthropology of dialogue that can be offered through an anthropological deepening of rhetoric. From the attention that is due to the interlocutor as a person, we obtain—in the light of both the philosophy of care and the theory of politeness—a particular approach to the notion of service. This notion, made ambiguous by our modern sensitivity, receives a new reading when it is interpreted in the sense of ‗care‘. In recalling the ancient roots of the notion of person, it is revealing how much the recent relational sociology offers to conceive dialogue as a relational good, a human good that only can be made together. The conditions for reaching this specific approach are recent, even if the fundamental notions (relation, person, service, care) are rather old.Downloads
References
Abraham, Werner (2012) ―(Inter)Subjectification or Foreign Consciousness / Other‘s Mind Alignement as Synchronic and Diachronic Concepts of Change? Conceptualizations and Data Fidelity.‖ [In:] W. Abraham, E. Leiss (eds.), Covert Patterns of Modality. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 24-78.
Agnetta, Marco, Adelino Cattani, Alberto Gil, Rafael Jiménez Cataño and Sergio Tapia Velasco (2018) ―Rhetorical Anthropology or Anthropological Rhetoric: Foundations of the ̳Rhetoric & Anthropology‘ Research Net.‖ Studia Anglica Resoviensia. 15-1; 5-27.
Archer, Margaret S. (2003) Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Augustinus (1995) De doctrina christiana. Latin and English ed. and transl. by R.P.H. Green. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson (1987) Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Rong (2001) ―Self-politeness: A proposal.‖ Journal of Pragmatics. 33; 87-106.
Cottingham, John (1978) ― ̳A Brute to the Brutes?‘: Descartes Treatment of Animals.‖ Philosophy. 53; 551-559.
Descartes, René (1902) Discours de la méthode. [In:] Ch. Adam, P. Tannery (eds.). Opera omnia. Vol. 6, Paris: Cerf.
Díaz del Castillo, Bernal (2005) Historia verdadera de la conquista de la Nueva España: manuscrito “Guatemala”. Edición crítica de J.A. Barbón Rodríguez. México: Colegio de México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Díaz del Castillo, Bernal (2007) The conquest of New Spain. Transl. with an introd. by J.M. Cohen. London: Penguin Books, ch. ―Montezuma‘s Captivity‖.
Donati, Pierpaolo (1991) Teoria relazionale della società. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Fisher, Berenice, and Joan C. Tronto (1991) ―Toward a Feminist Theory of Care.‖ [In:] Abel, Emily, and Margaret Nelson (eds.), Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 35-62.
Freud, Sigmund ([1916-17] 1920) A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. New York: Horace Liveright.
Garibay, Ángel María (ed.) (2000) Poesía náhuatl. vol. I. México: UNAM.
Goffman, Erving (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior. New York: Garden City.
González Iñárritu, Alejandro (2006) Babel. United States: Paramount Vantage. Film.
Heidegger, Martin ([1951] 2000) [In:] ―Bauen Wohnen Denken‖ [In:] Vorträge und Aufsätze.Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann; 145-164.
Heschel, Abraham J. (1965) Who is Man? Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
Jiménez Cataño, Rafael (2014a) ―Taking Care of Identity through Politeness.‖ Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series IV - Philology and Cultural Studies. 7/56; 39-50, http://www.diacronia.ro/ro/indexing/details/A18374/pdf – Accessed January 18th, 2020.
Jiménez Cataño, R. (2014b) ―Alteridad (Levinas-Paz).‖ [In:] J. Medina, J. Urabayen (eds.). Levinas confrontado. México: Porrúa; 321-333.
Jiménez Cataño, R. (2018) ―Social Virtues in Taking Care of the Image of Others.‖ Academic Journal of Modern Philology. 7; 79-87.
Kant, Immanuel (1911) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. [In:] Gesammelte Schriften – IV. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kant, I. (2002) Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kittay, Eva F. (2014) ―The Completion of Care – With Implications for a Duty to Receive Care Graciously.‖ [In:] González, A.M., and C. Iffland (eds.) Care Professions and Globalization. Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 33-42.
Lakoff, Robin T. (1973) ―The Logic of Politeness: or, Minding your p‘s and q‘s.‖ [In:] C.W. Corum, T.C. Smith-Stark, A. Weiser (eds.), Papers from the Ninth Regional Meetings of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society; 297-298.
Lévinas, Emmanuel ([1961] 1984) Totalité et infini: essai sur l’extériorité. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
Lévinas, E. ([1980] 1989) Le temps et l’autre. Paris: PUF.
Lévinas, E. ([1984] 1990) Difficult Freedom. Transl. S. Hand. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1999) Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need Virtues. Chicago: Open Court.
Oesterreich, Peter L. (1990) Fundamentalrhetorik. Untersuchung zu Person und Rede in der Öffentlichkeit. Hamburg: Meiner.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Studia Anglica Resoviensia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
