Scaffolding by Means of Scientific Concepts: A Teacher-guided Peer Response Activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2018.15.1.8Keywords:
writing instruction, peer response, scaffolding, scientific concepts, cognitive mediationAbstract
The paper analyzes the performance of a university student on a peer response activity which is part of an assignment in a writing course for second-year students of English philology. With Vygotsky’s (1987) doctrine of scientific concepts as a lens, it looks at how in the course of the peer response activity the teacher and the students support one another in their respective attempts to teach and learn writing. Teacher support on tasks, known as scaffolding (e.g. Stone 1998), is based on the idea that instruction should provide for transfer of responsibility for a complex task from teacher to student (Vygotsky 1978; Wood, Bruner, & Ross 1976). Adopting the Vygotskian perspective, I explain how in a teacher-guided peer response activity, student writers learn to verbalize their procedural how-to-write knowledge and to talk about their writing in order to regulate one another’s writing performance so that it meets the requirements of the assignment. The data help to substantiate the claim that experience in regulating others is the basis for the development of self-regulation by indicating how the language (scientific concepts) provided for use by students in the peer response activity can contribute to developing their self-regulated writing. For the teacher, a student’s performance on the peer response activity is a source of information on how to further assist the student in her/his development of the scientific concepts that mediate writing development.Downloads
References
Bitzer, Lloyd (1968) “The rhetorical situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric. Vol. 1; 1-14.
Brown, Ann; Joseph Campione (1994) “Guided discovery in a community of learners.” [In:] Kate McGilly (ed.) Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 229-270.
Castle, Gregory (2007) The Blackwell Guide to Literary Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Daniels, Harry (2007) “Pedagogy.” [In:] Harry Daniels, Michael Cole, James Wertsch (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. New York: Cambridge University Press; 307-331.
Elbow, Peter (1991) “Reflections on academic discourse: How it relates to freshmen and colleagues.” College English. Vol. 53; 135-155.
Flower, Linda, John R. Hayes (1981) “A cognitive process theory of writing.” College Composition and Communication. Vol. 32; 365-387.
Forman, Ellice, Courtney Cazden (1995) “Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction.” [In:] James Wertsch (ed.) Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press; 323-347.
Graff, Gerald (1999) “The academic language gap.” Clearing House. Vol. 72; 140-145.
Hairston, Maxine (1982) “The winds of change: Thomas Khun and the revolution in the teaching of writing.” College Composition and Communication. Vol. 33: 76-88.
Hodges, Karen (1982) “A history of revision: Theory versus practice.” [In:] Ronald Sudol (ed.) Revising: New Essays for Teachers of Writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English; 24-42.
Hyland, Ken, Fiona Hyland (2006) Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karpov, Yuriy (2003) “Vygotsky’s doctrine of scientific concepts: Its role for contemporary education.” [In:] Alex Kozulin, Boris Gindis, Vladimir Ageyev, Suzanne Miller (eds.) Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. New York: Cambridge University Press; 65-82.
Karpov, Yuriy, H. Carl Haywood (1998) “Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky’s concept of mediation: Implications for instruction.” American Psychologist. Vol. 53; 27-36.
Kozulin, Alex (2003) “Psychological tools and mediated learning.” [In:] Alex Kozulin, Boris Gindis, Vladimir Ageyev, Suzanne Miller (eds.) Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. New York: Cambridge University Press; 15-38.
Kozulin, Alex, Barbara Presseisen (1995) “Mediated learning experience and psychological tools: Vygotsky’s and Feuerstein’s perspectives in a study of student learning.” Educational Psychologist. Vol. 30; 67-75.
Mercer, Neil, Karen Littleton (2007) Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. London: Routledge.
Trimbur, John (1994) “Taking the social turn: Teaching writing post-process.” College Composition and Communication. Vol. 45; 108-118.
Scardamalia, Marlene, Carl Bereiter (1985) “The development of dialectical processes in composition.” [In:] David Olson, Nancy Torrance, Angela Hildyard (eds.) Literacy, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 307-329.
Stone, C. Addison (1998) “The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities.” Journal of Learning Disabilities. Vol. 31; 344-364.
Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, Lev S. (1981) “The genesis of higher mental functions.” [In:] James Wertsch (ed.) The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology. Armonk, NY: Sharpe; 144-188.
Vygotsky, Lev S. (1987) “Thinking and speech.” [In:] Robert Rieber, Aaron Carton (eds.) The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1: Problems of General Psychology. New York: Plenum; 39-284.
Wood, David, Jerome Bruner; Gail Ross (1976) “The role of tutoring in problem solving.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Vol. 17; 89-100.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Studia Anglica Resoviensia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
