Williamite Propaganda in the Anglo-Dutch Revolution

Authors

  • György Borus University of Debrecen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2015.12.11

Keywords:

English history, seventeenth century, political propaganda, Anglo-Dutch relations, revolution

Abstract

The primary aim of this essay is to provide a revision of the events of 1688-89 in England, which – for over three hundred years – have been known as the ‘Glorious Revolution’. I wish to argue that without the military intervention of William of Orange, Stadholder of the United Provinces, the Revolution would not have taken place, thus it would be more appropriate to refer to these events as the ‘Anglo-Dutch Revolution’. Williamite propaganda – which the paper describes in details – played a crucial part in the success of the Revolution, as well as in the shaping of the interpretation (the so-called Whig interpretation) of the events after 1689, which dominated historiography for almost three hundred years. There is special emphasis in the essay on the analysis of the most important instrument of William of Orange’s propaganda, the “Declaration of Reasons” (issued on 30 September 1688), which justified the invasion and explained the Prince’s intentions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Coward, B. 1995. The Stuart Age. England, 1603-1714. London and New York: Longman.

Edie, C. A. 1977. “Revolution and the Rule of Law: The End of the Dispensing Power, 1689.” [in:] Eighteenth-Century Studies. 10. 434-450.

Holmes, F. 2005. The Sickly Stuarts. The Medical Downfall of a Dynasty. Stroud: Sutton Publishing.

Johnson, R. R. 1978. “Politics Redefined: An Assessment of Recent Writings on the Late Stuart Period of English History, 1660 to 1714.” [in:] The William and Mary Quarterly. 35. 691-732.

Prall, S. E. 1972. The Bloodless Revolution. New York: Anchor Books.

Rose, C. 1999. England in the 1690s. Oxford: Blackwell.

Schwoerer, L. G. 1977. “Propaganda in the Revolution of 1688-89.” The American Historical Review. 82. 843-874.

_____. 1989. “Images of Queen Mary II.” [in:] Renaissance Quarterly. 42. 717-748.

_____. 1992. “Introduction.” [in:] Schwoerer L. G. (ed.) The Revolution of 1688-1689 –Changing Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Speck, W. A. (1987) “The Orangist Conspiracy against James II.” [in:] The Historical Journal. 30. 453-462.

_____. 1989. Reluctant Revolutionaries. Englishmen and the Revolution of 1688. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, M. P. 1977. “The Idea of Conquest Over the 1688 Revolution.” [in:] Journal of the History of Ideas. 38. 33-46.

Weil, R. J. 1992. “The Politics of Legitimacy: Women and the Warming-Pan Scandal.” [in:] Schwoerer L. G. (ed.) The Revolution of 1688-1689 – Changing Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Williams, E. N. 1980. Dictionary of English and European History, 1485-1789. London: Penguin Books.

Troost, W. 2005. William III, the Stadholder-King. A Political Biography. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-15

How to Cite

Borus, G. (2015). Williamite Propaganda in the Anglo-Dutch Revolution. Studia Anglica Resoviensia, 12(12), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2015.12.11

Issue

Section

Articles