A study of adjacency pairs in the film “Ted”: the case of dispreferred seconds used for a humorous effect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2023.20.7Keywords:
adjacency pairs, dispreferred second parts, conversation analysis, humour, film “Ted”, “Ted 2”Abstract
The purpose of the article is to concentrate on the identification of the linguistic features which are allegedly typical of the dispreferred second parts. There will be 12 instances to be analyzed where the adjacency pairs will include the dispreferred second parts. Moreover, the intention is to shed light on some positive aspects of the dispreferred second parts (dispreferred seconds) and attempt to demonstrate that in certain contexts the occurrence of the dispreferred second parts is justified or even necessary to achieve a special effect. In other words, the so called dispreferred seconds (second parts) will be analyzed from a different perspective - it will be demonstrated that the occurrence of the dispreferred second parts does not necessarily have to be perceived negatively. What is more, the presented utterances in the dispreferred second pair parts will even contribute to achieving a humorous effect. The purpose of the article is to concentrate on the identification of the linguistic features which are allegedly typical of the dispreferred second parts. There will be 12 instances to be analyzed where the adjacency pairs will include the dispreferred second parts. Moreover, the intention is to shed light on some positive aspects of the dispreferred second parts (dispreferred seconds) and attempt to demonstrate that in certain contexts the occurrence of the dispreferred second parts is justified or even necessary to achieve a special effect. In other words, the so called dispreferred seconds (second parts) will be analyzed from a different perspective - it will be demonstrated that the occurrence of the dispreferred second parts does not necessarily have to be perceived negatively. What is more, the presented utterances in the dispreferred second pair parts will even contribute to achieving a humorous effect.
Downloads
References
Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krisna Murti, I. (2014). A sociolinguistic analysis of dispreferred act on the second pair part by the main character in the movie Beauty and the Briefcase. Unpublished thesis. Yogyakarta University. (https://eprints.uny.ac.id/17617/1/Irma%20Krisna%20Murti%2010211144028.pdf).
Langford, D. (1994). Analyzing talk. Investigating verbal interaction in English. London: The Macmillan Press LTD.
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malmkjaer, K. (2006). Linguistics and the language of translation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Mazeland, H. (2006). Conversation analysis. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. 2nd Edition. Oxford, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, Vol. 3, pp. 153-162. (http://www.let.rug.nl/mazeland/ELL06maz.pdf, last accessed: 20.08.2023).
Nordquist, R. (2017). Adjacency pairs. (https://www.thoughtco.com/adjacency-pair-conversation-analysis-1688970).
Pluszczyk, A. (2019). A study of adjacency pairs in film discourse: The case of dispreferred second parts. In Krawczyk, E. (Ed.). Continuity and change. Conflict or Agreement? (pp. 20-40). Katowice: Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania Ochroną Pracy w Katowicach.
Richards, J. C. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. Harlow: Longman.
Schegloff, E. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. In American Anthropologist 70, 1075–1095.
Schegloff, E. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. In Semiotica 8 (4), 289–327.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Studia Anglica Resoviensia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.