Design and testing of breathing retraining device a multiphasic exploratory study in healthy subjects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2025.1.31Keywords:
breathing retraining device, incentive spirometer, inhalation exercises, pulmonary rehabilitation, respiratory therapy, volumetric measurementAbstract
Introduction and aim. Traditional spirometers are limited by bulkiness and lack of biofeedback, which can hinder their effec tiveness in pulmonary rehabilitation. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of an innovative breathing retraining device in measuring inhaled volume and assess user satisfaction compared to standard spirometers.
Material and methods. A multiphasic exploratory study was conducted with 102 healthy adults (aged 18–60 years). The study included three phases: need analysis through focus group discussions, prototype development using polycarbonate materials and 3D printing, and effectiveness testing. Inhalation exercises were performed with both the new device and a standard spi rometer. Primary outcomes were inhaled volume and marker displacement, with user satisfaction assessed via the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) questionnaire.
Results. The new device showed a strong correlation between inhaled volume and marker displacement (r=0.842, p<0.001). The mean inhaled volume was 2.07±0.61 liters, with a mean marker displacement of 5.19±0.59 cm. The mean QUEST 2.0 satis faction score was 3.54, indicating high user satisfaction.
Conclusion. The redesigned breathing retraining device not only addresses critical gaps in existing technologies but also offers a practical, user-friendly solution for pulmonary rehabilitation. By combining accuracy, real-time feedback, and portability, this innovation has the potential to redefine respiratory therapy standards in both clinical and home-based settings, paving the way for broader applications and improved patient outcomes.
Downloads
References
CLunardi AC, Porras DC, Barbosa RC, et al. Effect of volume-oriented versus flow-oriented incentive spirometry on chest wall volumes, inspiratory muscle activity, and thoracoabdominal synchrony in the elderly. Respir Care. 2014;59(3):420-426. doi:10.4187/respcare.02665
Gale C, Sanders DE. The bartlett-edwards incentive spirometer: A preliminary assessment of its use in the prevention of atelectasis after cardio-pulmonary bypass. Canad Anaesth Soc J. 1977; 24:408-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03005115
Miller KG, Inventor; Pegasus Research Corp, assignee. Turbine incentive spirometer. United States patent US 5,158,094. 1992. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5158094A/en. Accessed April 10, 2024.
Wu YF, Li CS, Hsu CP, et al. Electronic incentive spirometer. United States patent application US 15/626,171. 2018. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20180360346A1/en. Accessed April 10, 2024.
Sharpless EN, Gordon M, Lichtenstein J, inventors; Whitman Medical Corp, assignee. Incentive spirometer. United States patent US 4,391,283. 1983. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4391283A/en. Accessed April 10, 2024.
Bryant TK, Inventor; Carson Valley Research Llc, Assignee. Incentive spirometry devices by the employment of verbal simulated humanlike voices and using a tilt sensing component for ensuring patient actual use of the improved incentive spirometry devices. United States patent US 8,262,583. 2012. https://patents.google.com/patent/US8262583B1/en. Accessed April 10, 2024.
Weinstein LA, Richards FM, Wickstead JC, et al. Incentive spirometer. United States patent US 6,238,353. 2001. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6238353B1/en. Accessed April 10, 2024.
Eltorai AEM, Szabo AL, Antoci V, et al. Clinical Effectiveness of Incentive Spirometry for the Prevention of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications. Respir Care. 2018;63(3):347-352. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05679
Restrepo RD, Wettstein R, Wittnebel L, Tracy M. Incentive Spirometry: 2011. Respir Care. 2011;56(10):1600-1604. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01471
Chrystyn H, Small M, Milligan G, Higgins V, Gil EG, Estruch J. Impact of patients’ satisfaction with their inhalers on treatment compliance and health status in COPD. Respir Med. 2014;108(2):358-365. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.09.021
Kim K, Fell DW, Lee JH. Feedback Respiratory Training to Enhance Chest Expansion and Pulmonary Function in Chronic Stroke: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2011;23(1):75-79. doi: 10.1589/jpts.23.75
Eltorai AEM, Martin TJ, Patel SA, et al. Visual Obstruction of Flow Indicator Increases Inspiratory Volumes in Incentive Spirometry. Respir Care. 2019;64(5):590-594. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06331
Curran E, Porée T, Rubin BK. Real-Time Analysis of the Respiratory Flow Through a Valved Holding Chamber. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery. 2020;33(4):205-213. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2019.1563
Mishra P, Pandey C, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(1):67. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
LoMauro A, Aliverti A. Sex differences in respiratory function. Breathe. 2018;14(2):131-140. doi: 10.1183/20734735.000318
Sheel AW, Richards JC, Foster GE, Guenette JA. Sex Differences in Respiratory Exercise Physiology. Sports Medicine. 2004;34(9):567-579. doi: 10.2165/00007256200434090-00002
Guerreiro J, Jiménez-Arberas E, Porto Trillo P, et al. Cross-Cultural Validation of Quebec User Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 for Spanish Population (QUEST-2.0 ES). IJERPH. 2022;19(15):9349. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159349
Shi L, Liu F, Liu Y, et al. Biofeedback Respiratory Rehabilitation Training System Based on Virtual Reality Technology. Sensors. 2023;23(22):9025. doi: 10.3390/s23229025
Wu TD, McCormack MC, Mitzner W. The History of Pulmonary Function Testing. Respir Med. 2018:15-42. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94159-2_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our open access policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition: this means that articles have free availability on the public Internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from having access to the Internet itself.
All articles are published with free open access under the CC-BY Creative Commons attribution license (the current version is CC-BY, version 4.0). If you submit your paper for publication by the Eur J Clin Exp Med, you agree to have the CC-BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you, as the author, agree that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that Eur J Clin Exp Med content can be mined without barriers for the research needs.
