From Awareness to Action: Eye-Tracking Metacognitive Reading Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2025.22.5Keywords:
Metacognition, Academic Reading, Reading Strategies, Eye-tracking, MARSI-RAbstract
Metacognitive reading strategies are central to improving reading behaviour and comprehension, particularly for students reading in a second language (Grabe, 2009; Haukås et al., 2018). However, students’ self-reported awareness of these strategies does not always translate into effective use during reading tasks (Veenman & van Cleef, 2019). This study is an attempt to shift from awareness to action by implementing explicit metacognitive reading instruction. A group of first-year international students (N = 32) at a Hungarian university participated in a metacognitive reading intervention supported by eye-tracking technology. Participants completed the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory–Revised (MARSI-R; Mokhtari et al., 2018) and took part in pre- and post-instruction eye-tracking experiments and a reading comprehension exam (Cambridge Reading Test, B1). The instruction comprised 10 × 90-minute sessions, during which metacognitive reading strategies were introduced and practised. The initial eye-tracking experiment revealed a clear gap between students’ perceived strategy awareness and their observable reading behaviours. Following instruction, heatmaps and fixation data showed more purposeful, structured reading patterns, reduced fixation durations, and increased attention to task-relevant features. The findings show the potential of explicit metacognitive reading instruction in transforming reading behaviours, highlighting its essential role in second-language academic reading development.
Downloads
References
Afdal, H. W., Spernes, K., & Hoff-Jenssen, R. (2023). Academic reading as a social practice in higher education. Higher Education, 85(6), 1337–1355.
Al-khresheh, M. H., & Al Basheer Ben Ali, R. (2023). A mixed method study on the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies used by Saudi EFL students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 30–47.
Alturjman, M. G. (2024). Metacognitive reading strategies among international students in English-taught programs in Hungary. Alkalmazott Nyelvtudomány, 24(2), 160–176.
Bezborodova, A., & Radjabzade, S. (2022). English in higher education in the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. World Englishes, 41(1), 72–91.
Csíkos, C. (2022). Metacognitive and non-metacognitive processes in arithmetic performance: Can there be more than one meta-level? Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 53.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. Ablex Publishing.
Ghimire, N., & Mokhtari, K. (2025). Evaluating the predictive power of metacognitive reading strategies across diverse educational contexts. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 13(1), 4.
Godfroid, A., & Hui, B. (2025). Eye-tracking research in instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 1–31.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Haukås, Å., Bjørke, C., & Dypedahl, M. (2018). Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching. Taylor & Francis.
İncirkuş, F. A., & Beyreli, L. (2020). Effect of metacognitive reading strategies on critical thinking: A mixed methods research. Education and Science, 45(202), 173–190.
Kan, T., Noordin, N., & Ismail, L. (2024). Implementation of metacognitive reading strategies to improve English reading ability: A systematic review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(7), 368–389.
Klimovich, M., Tiffin‐Richards, S. P., & Richter, T. (2023). Does speed‐reading training work, and if so, why? Effects of speed‐reading training and metacognitive training on reading speed, comprehension and eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 46(2), 123–142.
Krishnan, C., Jeyakumar, V., & Raj, A. N. J. (2022). Real-time eye tracking using heat maps. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 35(4), 339–358.
Li, X., & Primecz, H. (2023). A qualitative exploration of the socioeconomic status and motivations of Chinese students in Hungary. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 9(1), 79–100.
Měkota, T. (2024). Using eye tracking to study reading landscape: A systematic review. AUC GEOGRAPHICA, 59(1), 120–136.
Mézière, D. C., Yu, L., Reichle, E. D., Von Der Malsburg, T., & McArthur, G. (2023). Using eye‐tracking measures to predict reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(3), 425–449.
Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the ‘metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory’(MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219–246.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259.
Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847–862.
Niehorster, D. C., Nyström, M., Hessels, R. S., Andersson, R., Benjamins, J. S., Hansen, D. W., & Hooge, I. T. (2025). The fundamentals of eye tracking part 4: Tools for conducting an eye tracking study. Behavior Research Methods, 57(1), 2–38.
Owen, N., Shrestha, P. N., & Hultgren, A. K. (2021). Researching academic reading in two contrasting English as a medium of instruction contexts at a university level. ETS Research Report Series, 2021(1), 1–28.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1), 111–139.
Semmelweis University. (2024, June 8). Chinese students on a four-week summer course organized by the Directorate of International Relations. https://semmelweis.hu/english/2024/08/chinese-students-on-a-four-week-summer-course-organized-by-the-directorate-of-international-relations/
Taub, M., Banzon, A. M., Zhang, T., & Chen, Z. (2022). Tracking changes in students’ online self-regulated learning behaviors and achievement goals using trace clustering and process mining. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 813514.
Tempus Public Foundation. (2023, April 1). International students in Hungary—Tempus Közalapítvány. https://tka.hu/international-programmes/15973/international-students-in-hungary
Urban, M., Urban, K., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2023). The effect of a distributed metacognitive strategy intervention on reading comprehension. Metacognition and Learning, 18(2), 405–424.
Veenman, M. V. (2016). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In R. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 249–273). Routledge.
Veenman, M. V., & van Cleef, D. (2019). Measuring metacognitive skills for mathematics: Students’ self-reports versus on-line assessment methods. ZDM, 51(4), 691–701.
Wang, F., Geng, X., & Han, J. (2024). Chinese university EFL learners’ English for General Academic Purposes: Relationships between target needs and self-efficacy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–9.
Xueyan, L. (2020). Chinese students choosing Hungarian tertiary education: A systematic review. East Asia, 37(4), 317–330.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Studia Anglica Resoviensia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
