Metaphorical projections in shooting instructions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2025.22.4Keywords:
sensorimotor experience, cross-domain projections, embodiment paradigm, shooting instructionsAbstract
Extensive research has been conducted within the cognitive semantics theoretical framework to investigate the metaphorical conceptualisation of abstract domains in terms of concrete ones. This body of research lends support to the embodiment paradigm adopted in cognitive science, which emphasises the role of sensorimotor experience in shaping cognition. Meanwhile, the potential application of cross-domain mappings in the conceptualisation and expression of sensorimotor experience has received little attention. This paper attempts to address this issue through an analysis of the linguistic data contained in tips for inexperienced amateur shooters that have been shared by expert shooters on internet blogs and YouTube videos. The study revealed that instructors intentionally and creatively prompt their listeners to activate familiar domains of physical activity and to make projections onto the physical activity of trigger pull, i.e. the skill they are learning. The paper argues that, in the analysed discourse, metaphorical cross-domain mappings can help instructors overcome the challenge of communicating concrete, physical information that cannot be demonstrated and is largely instructors’ internal, private sensorimotor sensation. The paper also compares the cross-domain mappings between concrete domains identified in the data with typical conceptual metaphors, and briefly addresses the question of how such mappings relate to the embodiment paradigm.
Downloads
References
Brown, T. L. (2003). Making truth: Metaphor in science. University of Illinois Press.
Cienki, A. (2009). “Conceptual Metaphor Theory in light of research on speakers’ Gestures” Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 349–366. DOI: 10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.349.
Cienki, A. (2017). “Analysing metaphor in gesture: A set of metaphor identification guidelines for gesture (MIGG)”. In E. Semino, Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (p. 131–147). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672953-20
Cienki, A. & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Benjamins.
Drogosz, A. (2019). A cognitive semantics approach to Darwin’s theory of evolution. AE Academic Publishers.
Evans, V. (2007). A glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Fojt, T. (2009). The construction of scientific knowledge through metaphor. Nicolaus Copernicus University Press.
Forceville, C. (2017). Visual and multimodal metaphor in advertising: cultural perspectives. Styles of Communication, 9(2), 26–41.
Forceville, C. (2009). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge University Press.
Forceville, C. & Urios-Aparisi E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal Metaphor. Mouton de Gruyter.
Fussell, S. R. (Ed.). (2002). The verbal communication of emotions. Interdisciplinary perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of anger, pride, and love. A lexical approach to the structure of concepts. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor. A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
Krzeszowski, T. (1997). Angels and devils in hell. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74.
Lakoff, G. (1991). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the gulf. Peace Research, 23(2–3), 25–32. DOI: 10.1515/cogsem.2009.4.2.5.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). (2nd ed.) Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books.
Łozińska, J. (2021). Imagery underlying metaphors: A cognitive study of a multimodal discourse of yoga classes. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021. 1905486
Mittelberg, I., & Waugh, L. R. (2009). Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.) Multimodal metaphor (pp. 329–356). Mouton de Gruyter.
Müller, K., Ladewig (2013). Metaphors for sensorimotor experiences: Gestures as embodied and dynamic conceptualizations of balance in dance lessons. In M. Borkent, B. Dancygier, & J. Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp. 295–324). CSLI Publications.
Sandikcioglu, E. (2000). More metaphorical warfare in the gulf: Orientalist frames in news coverage. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 299–320). Mouton de Gruyter.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E. ([1991]2016). The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human experience (revised edition). The MIT Press.
Zawisławska, M. (2011). Metafora w języku nauki: Na przykładzie nauk przyrodniczych. Wydawnictwa Wydziału Polonistyki UW.
Zbikowski, L. M. (2008). Metaphor and music. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 502–524). Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Studia Anglica Resoviensia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
