Are you talking to me? A case of specific reply by means of election campaign advertisements

Dorota Rut-Kluz

doi:10.15584/sar.2020.17.6

Authors

Dorota Rut-Kluz University of Rzeszow, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2020.17.6

Keywords:

discourse, Relevance Theory, genre, political campaigns, public/mass communication, 2012 U.S. presidential election campaign

Abstract

The article aims at an analytic description of a specific type of exchange occurring during political campaigns. The candidates often engage in a virtual dialogue; that is, an exchange of points made by means of campaign advertisements. The specific type of exchange or reply is, in certain aspects, no different to an ordinary conversation. However, what influences it most is the context of public/mass communication. The main concern of the presentation is to investigate, within the framework of Relevance Theory, ways in which a candidate’s reply to the opponent’s advertisement is actually a message to the viewers and prospective voters rather than to the rival themselves. The analysis is carried out on selected advertisements for Mitt Romney and Barack Obama broadcast during the U.S. presidential election campaign in 2012.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Forceville, Charles (2006) “Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research.” In: Gitte Kristiansen, Michel Achard, René Dirven, and Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives 379–402. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Forceville, Charles (2012) “Relevance Theory as model for analyzing visual and multimodal communication” In: David Machin (ed.), Visual Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Rut-Kluz, Dorota (2018) “Echo and Irony: Weapons in Political Campaign” In: Studia Anglica Resoviensia vol. 15(2), Rzeszów, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. 158–170.

Sperber, Dan, Deidre Wilson (1981) "Irony and the use-mention distinction." In: Radical Pragmatics. Ed. Peter Cole. New York: Academic Press, 295–318.

Sperber, Dan, Deidre Wilson (1992) "On verbal irony." In: Lingua 87, 53–76.

Sperber, Dan, Deidre Wilson (1996) Relevance Communication and Cognition. Oxford UK and Cambridge USA, Blackwell. (2nd edition).

Wilson, Deidre (1994) “Relevance and Understanding.” In: Language and Understanding, edited by Gillian Brown, Kirsten Malmkjaer, Alastair Pollitt & John Williams, 35–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilson, Deirdre (2006) “The pragmatics of verbal irony: echo or pretence?” In: Lingua 116, 1722–1743.

Wilson Deirdre and Dan Sperber (2012) "Explaining irony" chapter 6 of Meaning and Relevance, Cambridge University Press, 123–145.

Wilson Deirdre and Dan Sperber (2004) “Relevance Theory.” In: Handbook of pragmatics, edited by Gregory Ward and Laurence Horn, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.

Yus, Francisco (1998) "Relevance theory and media discourse: A verbal-visual model of communication." In: Poetics 25, 293–309.

“Cynical” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FP41ogzwsBk&index=1&list=PLA52202AC1703E060

“Get Real” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8L-2_DvFtY&index=34&list=PLA52202AC1703E060

“Your Turn” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXVpTa_Y6Ho&list=PLA52202AC1703E060&index=45

“960 Days” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJihe-3BUrQ

“Bump in the Road” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EP2GsRzROF8

“20,000,000 Bumps in the Road” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krHFS0ztQZ4

“Obama Isn't Working: Where are the Jobs?” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5siQO_lFF4