Echo and Irony: Weapons in Political Campaigns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2018.15.2.11Keywords:
relevance theory, attributive use, echoic use, TV campaign advertisements, US presidential election campaignAbstract
The theory of relevance presented by Dan Sperber and Deidre Wilson (1995) is a general theory of communication which has been developing over the past decades and apart from the theoretical developments it has been implemented as a tool for various analyses of discourse. The aim of the paper is to present a relevance theoretic account of a special kind of attributive use of campaign material which was employed by candidates in TV advertisements for the US presidential election campaign in 2012. Candidates use this special kind, echoic use, implementing it not only to criticise the opponent but also to justify their negative attitude towards the material mentioned. Echoic use proves to be a powerful tool not only to criticise and maintain credibility, but also allow irony which seems to be, along with discrediting the rival, the most powerful weapon at a politician's disposal.Downloads
References
CampaignAdCentral (2012a) First 100 Days – Virginia. [Available at:] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWec1_rsY7M [Accessed 1 September 2018]
CampaignAdCentral (2012b) Firms. [Available at:] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOsrXRs9eEQ [Accessed 1 September 2018]
CampaignAdCentral (2012c) Mosaic. [Available at:] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwAbdin9fU4 [Accessed 1 September 2018]
CampaignAdCentral (2012d) Revealed – Virginia. [Available at:] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh7_rAMwbBc [Accessed 1 September 2018]
Carston, Robyn (2002) “Metaphor, Ad Hoc Concepts and Word Meaning – More Questions Than Answers.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 1;: 84-105.
Carston, Robyn (2010) “Metaphor: Ad Hoc Concepts, Literal Meaning and Mental Images.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110(3); 295-321.
D’Errico, Francesca and Isabella Poggi. (2012) “Blame the Opponent! Effects of Multimodal Discrediting Moves in Public Debates.” Cognitive Computation 4(4); 460-476.
Kitis, Eliza (1999) “On Relevance Again: From Philosophy of Language Across ‘Pragmatics and Power’ to Global Relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics 31; 643-667.
Rut-Kluz, Dorota (2014) “Multimodal Discourse: Many Inputs, One Relevance in Obama Campaign TV Advertisements.” in Grzegorz A. Kleparski, Ewa Konieczna, Beata Kopecka(eds.) The Subcarpathian Studies in English Language, Literature and Culture. Chełm: TAWA; 173-185
Sperber, Dan and Deidre Wilson (1981) “Irony and the Use-mention Distinction.” [In:] Peter Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press; 295-318.
Sperber, Dan and Deidre Wilson (1987) “Presumptions of Relevance.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10; 736-753.
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson (1998) “Irony and Relevance: A Reply to Drs Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi” [In:] Robyn Carston and Seiji Uchida (eds.) Relevance theory: Applications and implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 283-293.
Sperber, Dan and Deidre Wilson (1995) Relevance Communication and Cognition. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
Wilson, Deirdre (1994) “Relevance and Understanding.” [In:] Gillian Brown, Kirsten Malmkjaer, Alastair Pollitt and John Williams (eds.) Language and Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 35-58.
Wilson, Deirdre (2006) “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?” Lingua 116: 1722-1743.
Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber (1992) “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua 87; 53-76.
Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber (2004) “Relevance Theory.” [In:] Gregory Ward and Laurence Horn (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell; 607-632.
Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber (2012) “Explaining irony.” [In:] Deirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber (eds.) Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 123-145.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Studia Anglica Resoviensia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
