Sources of Ambiguity in Language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/sar.2017.14.4Keywords:
syntax, syntactic ambiguity, possessive determiner ambiguity, disambiguation, humourAbstract
The English language can lead to many ambiguous utterances. A mere word or a phrase may, in its relationship to other words or phrases, force a reader or listener to attempt to construe its meaning in more than one way. It is frequent that a sentence on its own can be vague, but it can become disambiguated within a certain frame of reference. The focus of this paper are sentences or phrases which are difficult to understand because of incorrect or imprecise possessive determiners. Such sentences are often the source of voluntary or involuntary humour. As long as the humour is intended, the ambiguity is acceptable and even encouraged. On the other hand, when the main purpose is to convey information the point of the sentence should be as straightforward as possible. Bearing this in mind, I will attempt to resolve the problem by finding as many interpretations as possible and correcting the sentences, so that it leaves the reader with only one clear meaning.Downloads
References
Baker, L. 1998. English Syntax. London: The MIT Press.
Berry, D. M., Katmsties, K., Krieger, M. 2003. ‘From Contrast Drafting to Software Specification: Linguistic Sources of Ambiguity’ [in:] Online Version 1.0. 479-86. accessed at: http://sc.m'ateiioo.ca/~dbcrry./handbook/ambiguityHandbook.pdf
Durda, K., Caron, R. J., Buchanan, L. 2010. ‘An Application of Operational Research to Computational Linguistics: Word Ambiguity’ [in:] INFOR vol 48, no. 1. 1-11.
Francis, W. N. 1958. ‘Resolution of Structural Ambiguity by Lexical Probability: The English Double Object ' [in:] American Speech 31.2. 102-06.
Gause, D. C., Weinberg G. M. 1989. Exploring Requirements: Quality Before Design. Dorset House, New York, NY.
Gillion, B. S. 1990. ‘Ambiguity, Generality, and Indeterminacy: Tests and Definitions’ [in:] Synthese 85. 391-416.
Hamidi, Y. M. 2009. ‘Some cases of Ambiguity in English’ [in:] Daily Magazine, no. 38.1-21.
Hocza, A. 2006. ‘Learning Tree Patterns for Syntactic Parsing’ [in:] Acta Cybernetica 17. 647-659.
Hoekstra, T. 1988. 'Small Clause Results' [in:] Lingua 74, 101–139.
Kamsties, E. 2001. ‘Surfacing Ambiguity in Natural Language Requirements' Ph.D. Dissertation, Fachbereich Informatik, Universit ̈ at Kaiserslautern, Germany, also Volume 5 of Ph.D. Theses in Experimental Software Engineering, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
Lakoff, G. 1970. ‘A note on vagueness and ambiguity’ [in:] Linguistic Inquiry 1. 357-359.
Linna, P. 2008. 'Introducing Arguments' [in:] Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 48. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics (2 vols.). Cambridge: CUP. Palmer, F. R.
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2009. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary Mistler-Lachman, J. L. 1972. ‘Levels of Comprehension in Processing of Normal and Ambiguous Sentences’ [in:] Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11.5. 614-623.
Oaks, D. D., Lewis J. 1998. ‘What Can Humor and Advertising Teach Us About Legal Drafting?’ [in:] IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 41.4. 277-279.
Oaks, D. D. 2010. Structural Ambiguity in English. An Applied Grammatical Inventory. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Pelletier, F. J. 1994. ‘The Principle of Semantic Compositionality’ [in:] Topoi 13.11-24.
Pucknica, J. 2013. ‘The English Possessives and the Determiner v. Pronoun Distinction’ [in:] Cercles 29. 67-97.
Raskin, V. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrechc D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Rodd, J. M., Gaskell, M. G., Marslen-Wilson, W. D. 2004 ‘Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity’ [in:] Cognitive Science 28. 89-104.
Stageberg, N. C. 1958. ‘Some Structural Ambiguities’ [in:] English Journal 47.S. 479-86.
Stageberg, N. C. 1978. ‘Ambiguity In Action: A Bawdy Count’ [in:] Lingua Pranca, An Anology of Linguistic Humour. 39-46. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
Stageberg, N. C. 1981. An Introductory English Grammar. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. New York.
van Rooij, R. 2009. ‘Vagueness and Linguistics’ [in:] The Vagueness Handbook. 123-170.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Studia Anglica Resoviensia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.