Gait evaluation with Wisconsin Gait Scale of patients with hemiparesis after stroke
Keywords:
brain stroke, gait, rehabilitation, Wisconsin Gait ScaleAbstract
Introduction. Damage to the central nervous system caused by stroke is a reason of motor and cognitive functions impairment. Brain stroke is characterized by high level of disability moreover originated gait disorders influence on deterioration in quality of life. Gait analysis is necessary examination element and functional assessment of gait. In everyday clinical practice using of simple gait evaluation method is essential. They are mostly based on watching and describing or measurement of time parameters (e.g. velocity, distance). Rodriques et al. from the University of Wisconsin developed scale which can be used to evaluate the gait problems experienced by a patient with hemiplegia after stroke as well as to monitor the effectiveness of rehabilitation training.
Aim. The aim of the study is to present Wisconsin Gait Scale and showing possibilities for its use to assess patients with hemiplegia after brain stroke.
Materials and methods. The study included a group of patients with hemiplegia after brain stroke treated in the rehabilitation ward. Patients were enrolled according to the following inclusion criteria: ability to walk independently with or without a walking device, cognitive ability to follow the instruction, no orthopaedic co-morbidities influencing on gait. 10 subjects were included to the study with the mean age of 60,7 in different period after stroke. Gait was assessed using: Wisconsin Gait Scale, velocity of walking on 10 metres distance and Brunnström Scale. Wisconsin Gait Scale consists of 14 observable variables that measure clinically relevant components of gait which are grouped in 4 subscales. Total score range from 13,35 to 42. Higher result means that patent is characterized by more severe gait impairments. Subjects were videotaped using 2 cameras, which provided lateral, anterior and posterior view.
Conclusion. Preliminary observation showed that Wisconsit Gait Scale is useful tool which gives results helping in rehabilitation planning and assessing changes over time during rehabilitation training in patients after brain stroke. There were significant correlations between WGS score objective gait velocity and Brunnström recovery stage. It is necessary to provide further validation (interrater an intrarater reliability (conformity), repeatability) for Wisconsin Gait Scale.
Downloads
References
Mudge S., Stott N.: Outcome measures to assess walking ability following stroke: a systematic review of the literature, Physiotherapy 2007; 93: 189–200.
Kwolek A.: Rehabilitacja w udarze mózgu, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego 2009.
Tsai K., Yeh C., Lo H.: A novel design and clinical evaluation of a wheelchair for stroke patients, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2008; 38: 264–271.
Mauritz K.: Gait in training in hemiplegia, European journal of Neurology, 2002; 9 (1): 23–29.
Jonsdottir J., Recalcati M., Rabuffetti M., Casiraghi A., Boccardi S., Ferrarin M.: Functional resources to increase gait speed in people with stroke: Strategies adopted compared to healthy controls, Gait & Posture 2009; 29: 355–359.
Yavuzer G., Eser F., Karakus D., Stam H.: The effect of balance training on gait late after stroke: a randomized controlled trial, Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 960–969.
Patterson K., Gage W., Brooks D., Black S., McIlroy W.: Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: A comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization, Gait & Posture 2010; 31: 241–246.
Miller E., Combs S., Fish C., Bense B., Owens A., Burch A.: Running training after stroke: a single-subject report, Phys Ther 2008; 88, 4: 511–522.
Macko R., Benyenuti F., Stanhope S., Macellari V. i wsp.: Adaptive physical activity improves mobility function and quality of life in chronic hemiparesis, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2008; 2, 45: 323–328.
Mizuike C., Ohgi S., Morita S.: Analysis of stroke patient walking dynamics using a tri-axial accelerometer, Gait & Posture 2009; 30: 60–64.
Mirelman A., Patritti B., Bonato P., Deutsch J.: Effects of virtual reality training on gait biomechanics of individuals post-stroke, Gait & Posture 2010; 31, 4: 433–437.
Turani N., Kemiksizog A., Karatas M.: Assessment of hemiplegic gait using the Wisconsin Gait Scale, Scand J Caring Sci 2004; 18: 103–108.
Drużbicki M., Szymczyk D., Snela S., Dudek J., Chuchla M.: Obiektywne, ilościowe metody analizy chodu w praktyce klinicznej, Przegląd Medyczny Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego 2009; 4: 356–362.
Campanini I., Merlo A.: Reliabilty, smallest real difference and concurrent validity of indices computed from GRF components in gait of stroke patients, Gait & Posture 2009; 30: 127–131.
Rodriquez A. A., Black P. O., Kile K. A., Sherman J., Stellberg B., McCormnick J., Roszkowski J., Swiggum E.: Gait training efficacy using a home-based practice model in chronic hemiplegia, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77: 801–805
Wellmon R. Campbell S. L., Rubertone J. A., Ellison M. A., King R. M., Meduri C., Spatafore A. E., Talley J. M., Van Dyke A. C.: The interrater and intrarater reliability of the Wisconsin Gait Scale when administered by physical therapists to individuals post-stroke, Paper presented at the American Physical Therapy Association 2003 Combined Sections Meeting, Tampa, FL.
Pizzi A., Carlucci G., Falsini C. Lunghi F., Verdesca S. Grippo A.: Gait in hemiplegia: evaluation of clinical features with theWisconsin Gait Scale, J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 170–174.
Daly J.J., Nethery J., McCabe J. P., Brenner I., Rogers J., Gansen J., Butler K., Burdsall R., Roenigk K., Holcombo J.: Development and testing of the Gait Assessment and InterventionTool: a measure of coordinated gait components, Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2009; 178: 334–339.
Shmidt G., Werner C., Bernhart R., Hesse S., Kruger J.,: Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2007; 4, 2: 123–130.
Heerkens Y., Hendriks E., Oostendorp R.: Narzędzia oceny a Międzynarodowa Klasyfikacja Funkcjonalna w rehabilitacji i fizjoterapii, Rehabilitacja Medyczna 2006; 10, 3: 11–20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Medical Journal of the Rzeszow University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our open access policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition: this means that articles have free availability on the public Internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from having access to the Internet itself.
All articles are published with free open access under the CC-BY Creative Commons attribution license (the current version is CC-BY, version 4.0). If you submit your paper for publication by the Eur J Clin Exp Med, you agree to have the CC-BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you, as the author, agree that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that Eur J Clin Exp Med content can be mined without barriers for the research needs.
