The effectiveness of selected parameters of ultrasonic waves in the conservative treatment carpal tunnel syndrome

Authors

  • Andrzej Kwolek Z Instytutu Fizjoterapii Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
  • Jolanta Zwolińska Z Klinicznego Oddziału Rehabilitacji z Pododdziałem Wczesnej Rehabilitacji Neurologicznej

Keywords:

zespół cieśni kanału nadgarstka, terapia ultradźwiękowa, rehabilitacja

Abstract

Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome is one of the most common neuropathies in the upper limb on. It is a significant diagnostic and therapeutic problem. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the selected ultrasound wave parameters in conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Material and method: 61 people participated in the research. 102 hands were examined. Objects were assessed active and subjective clinical symptoms. Electroneurographic and computer examinations were performed measurement of the range of motion and strength of the hand squeezing. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Treat- did not include: ultrasound therapy, whirlpool massage and neuromobilization. In the first group, a continuous wave UD was applied with the intensity 0.3 I know, in the second group a continuous wave with the intensity 0.6 W / em ", and in In the third group, the impulse UD wave with the intensity of 0.6 I know ". The research was performed before the implementation of rehabilitation gram, after its completion and after one year.

Results: The obtained results indicate the effectiveness of the applied therapeutic program. Uses- statistically significant improvement in most of the symptoms tested was scanned. Assessment of treatment effects in depending on the type of ultrasonic wave used, it showed similar effectiveness of both intensively waves. Some of the assessed results obtained better results after sonication with the impulse wave parameters, although the differences demonstrated, except for pain experienced during the day, were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Ultrasonic waves with intensities in the range of low and medium doses reduce increasing the severity of clinical symptoms, and the total amount of energy decides about the results of the therapy transferred to the tissues during the procedure. The beneficial effects of sonication are more pronounced after using impulse wave application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Szyluk K., Widuchowski J., Jasiński A., Koczy B., Widuchowski W.: Wczesne wyniki leczenia operacyjnego zespołu kanału nadgarstka metodą endoskopową z wykorzystaniem jednego dostępu, Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja 2006, 2/6, 8, 172–81.

Anderson J. M., Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Common, treatable, but Not Necessarily Work-Related, Journal of Controversial Medical Claims. Contr. Medical Claims 2007, 14, 4, 1–9.

Stevenson J. R., Blake J.M., Douglas T.F., Kercheval D.M.: Does continous passive motion during keyboarding affect hand blood flow and wrist function? A prospective case report, IOS Press Work 24, 2005, 145–55.

Atcheson S.G.: Zespół kanału nadgarstka: czy to choroba zawodowa?, Medycyna po Dyplomie 2000, 9, 7, 142–51.

Ginszt A., Kuliński W.: Ocena zastosowania zmiennego pola magnetycznego niskiej częstotliwości w leczeniu niezaawansowanych idiopatycznych postaci zespołu kanału nadgarstka, Balneologia Polska 2002, XLIV, 57–68.

Małyszek Gribbin D.: Rehabilitacja zespołu cieśni nadgarstka [w:] Zespoły z ucisku: diagnostyka i leczenie, Kraków 2003, Ogólnopolska Konferencja Szkoleniowa pt. Zespoły z ucisku. Kraków 24–25.10.2003.

Martić V., Stepić N.: Savremen pristup lecenju sindroma karpalnog tunela, Vojnosanit Pregl 2006, 63, (10), 963–6.

Szczechowicz J., Pieniążek M., Pelczar-Pieniążek M.: Wpływ stosowania ćwiczeń poślizgowych nerwów i neuromobilizacji na wyniki końcowe leczenia usprawniającego pacjentów po chirurgicznym uwolnieniu nerwu pośrodkowego w kanale nadgarstka, Rehabilitacja Medyczna 2004, 8, 3, 33–41.

Giermek K., Dec L., Zmęczenie i regeneracja sił – odnowa biologiczna, Wydawnictwo AWF Katowice 2007.

Jaśkiewicz J. (red.): Jonoforeza i fonoforeza. Podstawy teoretyczne i zastosowanie praktyczne, Reh. Med. 2000, 4, Numer specjalny.

Robertson V.J., Baker K.G., A Review of Therapeutic Ultrasound: Effectiveness Studies, Physical Therapy 2001, 81, 7, 1339–50.

Ciechomski J.: Wykorzystanie technik terapii manualnej w połączeniu z fizykoterapią w leczeniu zespołu cieśni kanału nadgarstka, Med. Manual. 2001, 5, 3/4, 72–6.

Wilson J.K., Sevier T.L., A review of treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, Disabil. Rehabil. 2003, 25, 3, 113–19.

Goodyear-Smith F., Arroll B.: What Can Family Physicians Offer Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Other Than Surgery? A Systematic Review of Nonsurgical Management, Annals Of Family Medicyne 2004, 2, 3.

O’Connor D., Marshall S., Massy-Westropp N.: Nonsurgical treatment (other than steroid injection) for carpal tunnel syndrome, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2003, 1:CD003219.

Viera A. J.: Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Am. Fam. Physician. 2003, 68, 2, 265–72.

Gerritsen A. A., de Krom M.C., Struijs M.A., Scholten R. J., de Vet H.C.: Bouter L.M., Conservative treatment options for tunnel syndrome: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, J. Neurol. 2002, 249, (3), 272–80.

Muller M., Tsui D., Schnurr R., Biddulph-Deisroth L., Hard J., Mc Dermid J.C.: Effectiveness of hand therapy interventios in primary management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review, J. Hand. Ther. 2004, 17, (2), 210–28.

Piazzini D.B., Aprile I., Ferrara P.E., Bertolini C., Tonali P., Maggi L., Rabini A., Plantelli S., Padura L., A systematic review of conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, Clin. Rehabil. 2007, 21, (4), 299–314.

Draper D. O., Ultrasound works and compliments therapy, Phys. Ther. 2007, 87, 986–94.

Wong R.A., Schumann B., Townsend R., Phelps C. A.: A Survey of Therapeutic Ultrasound Use by Physical Therapists Who Are Orthopaedic Certified Specialists, Physical Therapy 2007, 87, 8, 986–94.

Amusat N.T.: Letters to Editor on “A surrey of therapeutic ultrasound use by physical therapists who are orthopaedic certified specialists, Wong et al. Phys. Ther. 2007, 87, 986–94” Phys. Ther. 2007, 87, 11, 1558.

Warden S.J., Mc Meeken J.M.: Ultrasund usage and dosage in sports physiotherapy, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2002, 28, (8), 1075–80.

Childs J.D.: Letters to Editor on “A surrey of therapeutic ultrasound use by physical therapists who are orthopaedic certified specialists, Wong et al. Phys. Ther. 2007, 87, 986–94” Phys. Ther. 2007, 87, 11, 1558.

Johns L.D., Colloton P., Neuenfeldt J., Krupo K.: Preexposure effects of 1 and 3 MHz therapeutic ultrasound on Con A actived spleenocytes, Cytokine 2003, 22, (3–4), 55–61.

Król M.: Zastosowanie ultradźwięków o różnej częstotliwości w leczeniu ran, Rehabilitacja, Fizykoterapia, Ortopedia. OPM 2003, 11, 32–5.

Koeke P.U., Parizotto N.A., Carrinho P.M., Salate A.C.: Comparative study of the efficacy of the topical application of hydrocortisone, therapeutic ultrasound and phonophoresis on the tissue repair process in rat tendons, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2005, 31, 345–50.

Deyne P.G., Kirsch-Volders M.: In vitro effects of therapeutic ultrasound on the nucleus of human fibroblasts, Phys. Ther. 1995, 75, (7), 629–34.

Byl NN., McKenzie A., Wong T., West J., Hunt TK.: Incision wound healing: a controlled study of low and high dose ultrasound, J. Orthop. and Sports Phys. Ther. 1993, 18 (5), 619–28.

Lyon R., Liu X.C., Meier J.: The effects of therapeutic vs. high-intensity ultrasound on the rabbit growth plate, J. Orthop. Res. 2003, 21, 5, 865.

Kuliński W., Fizykoterapia [w:] Kwolek A. (red) Rehabilitacja medyczna, Wydawnictwo Medyczne Urban & Partner Wrocław 2003.

Jaskólski D.J., Zespoły objawowe powstające z uwięźnięcia [w:] Kozubski W. (red) i Liberski P.P., Neurologia, (red), PZWL Warszawa 2006.

Pyszczek I., Kujawa J., Talar J., Wybrane właściwości fizyczne i biofizyczne fal ultradźwiękowych jako podstawa ich zastosowania w medycynie fizykalnej, Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja 2002, 4, 3, 370–82.

Bakhtiary A.H., Rashidy-Pour A., Ultrasound and laser therapy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, Aust. J. Physiother. 2004, 50, 3, 147–51.

Oztas O., Turan B., Bora I., Karakaya M.K., Ultrasound therapy effect in carpal tunel syndrome, Arch Phys Med. Rehabil. 1998, 79, 12, 1540–44.

Ebenbichler G.R., Resch K.L., Nicolakis P., Wiesinger G.F., Uhl F., Ghanem A.H., Fialka V., Ultrasound treatment for treating the carpal tunnel syndrome: randomised “sham” controlled trial, BMJ 1998, 316, 731–35.

Paik N.J., Cho S.H., Han T.R.: Ultrasound therapy facilitates the recovery of acute pressure-induced conduction block of the median nerve in rabbits, Muscle&Nerve 2002, 26, (3), 356–61.

Piravej K., Boonhong J.: Effect of ultrasound thermotherapy in mild moderate carpal tunnel syndrome, J Med Assoc Thai 2004, 87, 2, 100–06.

Dakowicz A., Latosiewicz R.: The value of iontophoresis combined with ultrasound in patients with the carpal tunnel syndrome, Roczniki Akademii Medycznej w Białymstoku 2005, 50, 1, 196–98.

Published

2009-09-30

How to Cite

Kwolek, A., & Zwolińska, J. (2009). The effectiveness of selected parameters of ultrasonic waves in the conservative treatment carpal tunnel syndrome. European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 7(3), 260–268. Retrieved from https://journals.ur.edu.pl/ejcem/article/view/13154

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>