Commentary to the resolution of the Supreme Court of 22/05/2013, III CZP 18/13

Abstract

This commentary critically discusses the resolution of the Supreme Court in which the easement of transmission was presented and in which the possibility of aggregating the periods of having an easement and transmission easement before August 3, 2008 was allowed. The attempt was made to provide comprehensive arguments against the interpretation of provisions the law presented by the Supreme Court. The argumentation refers to the understanding of basic legal institutions and principles of property law.