Ban on so-called reverse distribution of medicines as a public tribute?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/iuseta.2023.1.11Keywords:
statutory restrictions, public burdens and benefits, public tributes, interpretive decisions, temporal effect of changes in legal interpretation, reverse distribution of medicinesAbstract
The Act – Entrepreneurs’ Law provides that an entrepreneur may submit an application to a competent authority or a competent state organisational unit for issuance of an explanation regarding the scope and manner of application of regulations from which the entrepreneur’s obligation to pay public levy or social or health insurance contributions arises, in his/her individual case (individual interpretation). The effective filing of an application requires the fulfilment of subjectmatter prerequisites, i.e. the application may be filed only by an entrepreneur and only in relations to the provisions concerning public levy or social and health insurance contributions. The article analyses the restrictions on the sale of medicines (prohibition of the so-called reverse distribution of medicines), in the context of the possibility of qualifying these restrictions as public tributes. The paper indicates what public burdens and benefits and public tributes are in the light of the applicable legislation, doctrinal views and case law. It is clear from the article that the prohibition of the so-called reverse distribution of medicines is an important restriction for the entrepreneur, but it is not a public tribute. Consequently, the conclusion is drawn that an entrepreneur cannot successfully apply for an interpretative decision regarding Article 86a of the Pharmaceutical Law.
Downloads
References
Antonów D.M., Cechy danin publicznych w polskim systemie prawa, Annales Universitatis Curie-Skłodowska, Lublin-Polonia, Sectio G, Vol. LXIII, 1/2016.
Bień-Kacała A., Wantoch-Rekowski J., Komentarz do Konstytucji RP, art. 84, 217, Warszawa 2022.
Bień-Kacała A., Zasada władztwa daninowego w Konstytucji RP z 1997 r., Toruń 2005.
Brzezicki T., Noga M., Wantoch-Rekowski J., Wydawanie decyzji interpretacyjnych przedsiębiorcom przez ZUS, Warszawa 2021.
Brzezicki T., Wantoch-Rekowski J., O możliwości wyeliminowania z obrotu prawnego interpretacji składkowych, „Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego” 2015, nr 1.
Brzeziński B., Prawo podatkowe. Zagadnienia teorii i praktyki, Toruń 2017.
Dębowska-Romanowska T., Nowak T., Komentarz do art. 84 [w:] Konstytucja RP, t. I, Komentarz do art. 1–86, red. M. Safjan, L. Bosek, Legalis/el. 2016.
Działocha K., Łukaszczuk A., Komentarz do art. 84 [w:] Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Komentarz, t. II, red. L. Garlicki, M. Zubik, Wydawnictwo Sejmowe/el. 2016.
Krawczyk-Sawicka A., Reguła ustawowego nakładania podatków i innych ciężarów publicznych w świetle art. 217 Konstytucji RP z 1997 r., „Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego” 2012, nr 2.
Olszewski W., Komentarz do art. 86a [w:] Prawo farmaceutyczne. Komentarz, red. W. Olszewski, Wolters Kluwer 2016, LEX.
Wantoch-Rekowski J., Pensions and pension insurance contributions in the light of Polish constitutional regulations – outline of the problem, „Kobe University Law Review” 2020, nr 53.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ius et Administratio

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.