Price Discrimination in Digital Marketplace: an Analysis of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) and Digital Arbitrage

Autor

  • Emre Vural Department of Economics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/te.2025.7.1.3

Słowa kluczowe:

price discrimination, geo-blocking, digital arbitrage, purchasing power parity

Abstrakt

Today's digital borders are being redrawn by companies through geo-blocking and regional pricing strategies. The concept of digital arbitrage has entered our lives as a result of consumers in different countries accessing products/services at different prices, in line with companies' price differentiation strategies. This study aims to examine regional pricing in digital markets within the framework of purchasing power parity, and to explain the concepts of digital arbitrage and geo-blocking as methods of preventing digital arbitrage. Furthermore, this study aims to empirically test pricing behaviours on Steam, the world's largest digital game distribution platform, by correlating them with countries' purchasing power parity. The price of a basket consisting of 10 games was examined in 63 countries from different income groups and analysed using both linear and log-linear regression models. The findings suggest a statistically significant positive relationship between income levels and digital game prices, although the explanatory power of the linear model remains limited. The log-linear specification provides a better fit, indicating that the relationship may be proportional rather than strictly linear. In addition, deviations from predicted prices reveal substantial cross-country differences and point to the potential existence of digital arbitrage opportunities. The study contributes to the literature by revealing, through concrete data, how price differentiation policies trigger digital migration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

Besiekierska, A., (2021). Spatial aspects of ecommerce in the European Union: prohibitions to geo-block or to discriminate based on geographic location, GIS Odyssey Journal, 1(2), pp. 93–101, doi: 10.57599/gisoj.2021.1.2.93.

Bourreau, M., Manenti, F. M., (2022). Selling cross-border in online markets: the impact of the ban on geoblocking strategies, International Journal of Industrial Organization, doi: 10.1017/S0167718722000674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2022.102892

Cardona, M., (2016). Geo-blocking in Cross-border e-Commerce in the EU Digital Single Market. Digital Economy Working Paper 2016/04. Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre.

Cassel, G., (1918). Abnormal deviations in international exchanges, The Economic Journal, 28(112), pp. 413–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2223329

Cavallo, A., (2017). Are online and offline prices similar? Evidence from large multi-channel retailers, American Economic Review, 107(1), pp. 283–303, doi: 10.1257/aer.20160542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160542

Duch-Brown, N., Grzybowski, L., Romahn, A. and Verboven, F., (2020). Evaluating the impact of market integration: banning online trade restrictions in the EU portable PC market, Discussion Paper Series DPS20.10. Leuven: KU Leuven, Department of Economics.

Duch-Brown, N., Martens, B., (2016). The Economic Impact of Removing Geo-blocking Restrictions in the EU Digital Single Market. Digital Economy Working Paper 2016/02. Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2783647

European Commission, (2024). Geo-blocking. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/geoblocking [Accessed 7 February 2026].

European Court of Auditors, (2025). Unjustified geo-blocking in e-commerce: The Regulation provides a balanced framework, but challenges remain in implementation.

European Union, (2018). Regulation (EU) 2018/302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 February 2018 on addressing unjustified geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market, Official Journal of the European Union, L 60, pp. 1–15.

Fortes, P. R. B., Martins, G. M. and Oliveira, P. F., (2021). Digital geodiscrimination: how algorithms may discriminate based on consumers' geographical location, Droit et Société, 107(1), pp. 145–166, doi: 10.3917/drs1.107.0145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs1.107.0145

Grochowski, M., Jabłonowska, A., Lagioia, F., and Sartor, G., (2022). Algorithmic Price Discrimination and Consumer Protection: A Digital Arms Race?, Technology and Regulation, 2022, pp. 36–47, doi: 10.71265/kd9w2w17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71265/kd9w2w17

Gómez Trujillo, A. M., (2023). The gaming industry under the Digital Markets Act: Competition and platform regulation. Master’s Thesis. Tilburg University.

Gyódi, K., Sobolewski, M. and Ziembiński, M., (2017). What drives price dispersion in the European e-commerce industry?, Central European Economic Journal, 3(50), pp. 53–71, doi: 10.1515/ceej-2017-0017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ceej-2017-0017

Hutchinson, C., (2018). Challenges to competition of geographic restrictions to online sales of goods and digital content, Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, (4), pp. 270–299, doi: 10.17323/2072-8166.2018.4.270.299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2018.4.270.299

OECD, (2023). Algorithmic Competition. OECD Competition Policy Roundtable Background Note.

Phlips, L., (1983). The economics of price discrimination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Poort, J., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., (2019). Does everyone have a price? Understanding people’s attitude towards online and offline price discrimination. Internet Policy Review, 8(1), doi: 10.14763/2019.1.1383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.1.1383

UNCTAD, (2024). Digital Economy Report 2024: Shaping an environmentally sustainable and inclusive digital future. United Nations.

Zarra, A., (2016). Geo-blocking and price discrimination by online marketplaces in the EU. Master’s Thesis. Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.

Žd’árek, Václav (2012). An Empirical Investigation of the Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis in European Transition Countries. Prague Economic Papers. 21, pp. 257–276. 10.18267/j.pep.423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.423

Opublikowane

2025-06-30

Jak cytować

Vural, E. (2025). Price Discrimination in Digital Marketplace: an Analysis of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) and Digital Arbitrage. TRANSBORDER ECONOMICS. International Journal on Transborder Economics, Finance, Politics and Statistics., 7(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.15584/te.2025.7.1.3

Numer

Dział

Artykuły