Dyskurs we współczesnym językoznawstwie anglojęzycznym
Abstrakt
The first section of the article deals with the main assumptions of functional linguistics in which the analyses of language functions, discourse and linguistic pragmatics are at the centre of investigation. The following sections of the paper present the most important approaches to discourse analysis and linguistic pragmatics. The final section briefly discusses the multidimensional character of discourse analysis and pragmatics, as well as the relation between discourse analysis and paralinguistics.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Austin J., 1962, How to Do Things with Words, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, MA.
Chomsky N., 1957, Syntactic Structures, Mouton, Haga.
Chruszczewski P., 2002, The Communicational Grammar of Political Discourse, Logos Verlag, Berlin.
Bondarko A., 1991, Functional Grammar: A Field Approach, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Brown G., Yule G., 1983, Discourse Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Chafe W., 1994, Discourse, Consciousness and Time, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Dik S., 1987, The Theory of Functional Grammar, Edmonson W., 1981, Spoken Discourse: A Foris, Dordrecht. Model for Analysis, Longman, London and New York.
Fasold R., 1990, Sociolinguistics of Language, Blackwell, Oxford.
Fribas J., 1986, A systematic view of functional sentence perspective [w:] Teoria tekstu, red. T. Dobrzyńska, s. 117-136.
Garfinkel H., 1974, On the origins of the term ,,ethnomethodology” [w:] Ethnomethodology, red. W. Turner, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Givon T., 1989, Mind, Code and Context: An Essay in Pragmatics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Grice H., 1975, Logic and conversation [w:] Syntax and semantics: speech acts, vol. 3, red. P. Cole i J. Morgan, Academic Press, New York, s. 41-58.
Gumperz J., 1982, Discourse Strategies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Halliday M., 1978, Language as a Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, Edward Arnold, London.
Harris Z., 1951, Structural Linguistics, Phoenics, Chicago.
Hymes D., 1974, Toward ethnographies of communication [w:] Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, s. 3-28.
Kopytko R., 2000, Cartesianism versus Kantianism: A choice for pragmatics?, „Rask” 13, s. 57-78.
Kopytko R., 2001, From Cartesian towards non-Cartesian pragmatics, „Journal of Pragmatic” 33, s. 783-804.
Kopytko R., 2004, The affective context in non-Cartesian pragmatics: A Theoretical grounding, „Journal of Pragmatics” 36, s. 521-548.
Krzeszowski T., 1997, Angels and Devils in Hell. Elements of Axiology in Semantics, Wydawnictwo Energeia, Warszawa.
Kuno S. 1972, Functional sentence perspective: a case study from Japanese and English, „Linguistic Inquiry” 3(2), s. 61-195.
Lees R., 1960, The Grammar of English Nominalizations, Mouton, Haga.
Levinson S., 1983, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Martinet, A. 1962, A Functional View of Language, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Morris C., 1938, Foundations of the theory of signs [w:] International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, red. O. Neurath, R. Carnap i C. Morris, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Schiffrin D., 1994, Approaches to Discourse, Balckwell, Cambridge, Mass., Oxford.
Searle J., 1969, Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
van Dijk T., 1980, Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse, Longman, London.
van Dijk T., 1985, Introduction: Discourse as a new cross-discipline [w:] Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 1: Disciplines of Discourse, red. T. van Dijk, Academic Press, New York, s. 1-10.
Widdowson H., 1979, Directions in the teaching of discourse [w:] Explorations in Applied Linguistics, red. H. Widdowson, Oxford University Press, Oxford, s. 89-100.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2010 Słowo. Studia językoznawcze
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
