Some Remarks on Social and Symbolic Significance of the Early Neolithic Longhouses Based on the Applications and Spatial Distribution of Ground Stone Type Tools. The Case of the Linear Pottery Sites from Lesser Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/anarres.2022.17.1Keywords:
Neolithic, Lesser Poland, stone tools, Linear Pottery culture (LBK), longhousesAbstract
This article attempts to present some aspects of the spatial reconstruction, modes of use, and social relations in the longhouse settlements of the Linear Pottery culture (LBK) by means of a contextual distributional analysis of ground stone artefacts. Three LBK settlement complexes from Lesser Poland (southern Poland) were selected for analysis based on a considerable number of finds of ground stone tools yielded by the excavations. Accurate determination of the intended use of a stone object, as indicated by the traces of use on its surface, was of central importance. Based on the above data, the author has distinguished two types of household sectors in LBK settlements with longhouses, namely domestic and communal. It is argued that the inhabitants of a given longhouse used the domestic sector for their purposes, while the latter served the community. Significant differences in the proportions of ground stones were found between settlements and between the settlement phases of a village. This leads the author to consider whether there might have been specialized settlements for a particular microregion in addition to the function served by a single longhouse. Each settlement would have specialized in different household tasks.
References
Adams J. L. 1989. Experimental replication of the use of ground stone tools. KIVA 54(3), 261–271.
Adams J. 2002. Ground Stone Artifacts: A Technological Approach. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press.
Bánffy E. 2013. Tracing the Beginning of Sedentary Life in the Carpathian Basin. In D. Hofmann and J. Smyth (eds.), Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe: Sedentism, Architecture, and Practice. New York: Springer, 117–149.
Baysal A. and Wright K. 2005. Cooking, Crafts, and Curation: Ground-stone Artefacts from Çatalhöyük. In I. Hodder (ed.), Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–99 Seasons (= Catalhöyük Research Project 5). Cambridge: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara and McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 307–324.
Beneš J., Divišová M. and Vondrovský V. 2016. The Neolithic longhouse phenomenon at the Hrdlovka site, Czech Republic: meanings, inhabitants, and successors. In L. Amkreutz, F. Haack, D. Hofmann and I. van Wijk (eds.), Something out of the ordinary? Interpreting Diversity in the Early Neolithic Linearbandkeramik and Beyond. Cambridge: Scholars Publishing, 65–88.
Beneš J., Vondrovský V., Ptáková M., Kovačiková L. and Šída P. 2019. The Neolithic site of Hrdlovka. České Budějovice, Most: Nakladatelství Jihočeské univerzity v Českých Budějovicích.
Bickle P., Chan B., Czerniak L., Pyzel J. and Tsoraki C. 2016. At Home in the Neolithic: Understanding Diversity in Neolithic Houses and Households. Open Archaeology 2, 410–416. DOI: 10.1515/opar-2016-0029.
Bickle P. and Whittle A. 2013. LBK lifeways: a search for difference. In P. Bickle and A. Whittle (eds.), The first farmers of central Europe. Diversity in LBK lifeways. Oxford: Oxbow, 1–25.
Bocquentin F., Khalaily H., Boaretto E., Dubreuil L., Schechter H. C., Bar-Yosef Mayer D. E. -...- Horwitz L. K. 2020. Between Two Worlds: The PPNB–PPNC Transition in the Central Levant as Seen Through Discoveries at Beisamoun. In H. Khalaily, A. Re’em, J. Vardi and I. Milevski (eds.), The Mega Project at Motza (Moẓa): The Neolithic and Later Occupations up to the 20th Century. New Studies in the Archaeology of Jerusalem and Its Region. Supplementary Volume. Jerusalem: Israel Antiquities Authority, 163–199.
Borić D. 2008. First households and “house societies” in European prehistory. In A. Jones (ed.), Prehistoric Europe. Theory and practice. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 109–142.
Coudart A. 2015. The Bandkeramik longhouses: a material, social, and mental metaphor for small-scale sedentary societies. In C. Fowler, J. Harding and D. Hofmann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Neolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 309–325.
Cutting M. V. 2005. The Neolithic and Early Chalcolithic farmers of central and southwest Anatolia: household, community and the changing use of space. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Czekaj-Zastawny A. 2008. Osadnictwo społeczności kultury ceramiki wstęgowej rytej w dorzeczu górnej Wisły. Kraków: Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
Czekaj-Zastawny A. 2014. Brzezie 17. Osada kultury ceramiki wstęgowej rytej (= Via Archaeologica. Źródła z badań wykopaliskowych na trasie autostrady A4 w Małopolsce). Kraków: Krakowski Zespół do Badań Autostrad.
Czekaj-Zastawny A. and Przybyła M. M. 2012. Modlniczka 2, powiat krakowski – cmentarzysko kultury ceramiki wstęgowej rytej i osady neolityczne (= Via Archaeologica. Źródła z badań wykopaliskowych na trasie autostrady A4 w Małopolsce). Kraków: Krakowski Zespół do Badań Autostrad.
Czerniak L. 2013. House, household and village in the Early Neolithic of central Europe: a case study of the LBK in Little Poland. In S. Kadrow and P. Włodarczak (eds.), Environment and subsistence – forty years after Janusz Kruk’s “Settlement studies…”. Bonn: Habelt, 43–68.
Czerniak L. 2016. House and Household in the LBK. In L. Amkreutz, F. Haack, D. Hofmann and I. van Wijk (eds.), Something out of the Ordinary? Interpreting Diversity in the Early Neolithic Linearbandkeramik and Beyond. Cambridge: Scholars Publishing, 33–64.
Czerniak L. 2018. Is length significant? LBK longhouses and the social context in central-eastern Europe. In P. Valde-Nowak, K. Sobczyk, M. Nowak and J. Źrałka (eds.), Amici magistro et collegae suo – Ioanni Christopho Kozłowski dedicant. Kraków: Institute of Archaeology. Jagiellonian University in Kraków, 401–409.
Czerniak L. 2019. Kto mieszkał w długich domach? Próba nowego spojrzenia na możliwości rekonstrukcji domu kultury ceramiki wstęgowej rytej. In M. Szmyt, P. Chachlikowski, J. Czebreszuk, M. Ignaczak and P. Makarowicz (eds.), VIR BIMARIS. Od kujawskiego matecznika do stepów nadczarnomorskich. Studia z dziejów międzymorza bałtycko-pontyjskiego (= Archaeologia Bimaris 5). Poznań: Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, 229–241.
Czerniak L., Pyzel J., Badtke A., Golański A., Michalak K., Połczyński Ł.-…- and Wąs M. 2011. Osady kultury ceramiki wstęgowej rytej. Modlnica, gm. Wielka Wieś, woj. małopolskie, stanowisko 5. Kraków: unpublished manuscript in archive of Krakowski Zespół do Badań Autostrad.
Czerniak L., Pyzel J., Badtke A., Michalak K. and Połczyński Ł. 2012a. Osada kultury ceramiki wstęgowej rytej w Targowisku, stan. 16. Kraków: unpublished manuscript in archive of Krakowski Zespół do Badań Autostrad.
Czerniak L., Pyzel J., Badtke A., Michalak K. and Połczyński Ł. 2012b. Osada kultury ceramiki wstęgowej rytej w Brzeziu, stan. 40. Kraków: unpublished manuscript in archive of Krakowski Zespół do Badań Autostrad.
Edmonds M. 1995. Stone Tools and Society. Working Stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: B. T. Batsford Ltd.
Graefe J., Hamon C., Lidström-Holmberg C., Tsoraki C. and Watts S. 2009. Subsistence, social and ritual practices: quern deposits in the Neolithic societies of Europe. In S. Bonnardin, C. Hamon, M. Lauwers and B. Quilliec (eds.), Du matériel au spirituel. Réalités archéologiques et historiques des «dépôts» de la Préhistoire a nos jours. Antibes: Éditions APDCA, 87–96.
Hachem L. 2000. New observations on the Bandkeramik house and social organization. Antiquity 74, 308–312.
Hachem L. 2011. Le site néolithique de Cuira-les-Chaudardes – I. De l´analyse de la faune a la structuration sociale. Rahden, Westf.: Leidorf.
Hamon C. 2008. The symbolic value of grindingstones hoards: technical properties of Neolithic examples. In C. Hamon and B. Quilliec (eds.), Hoards from the Neolithic to the Metal Ages, technical and codified practices. Oxford: Archaeopress, 19–28.
Hamon C. 2020. Isn’t it strange? Grinding tool deposits and deposition in the north-western LBK. In D. Hofamnn (ed.), Magical, Mundane or Marginal? Deposition practices in the Early Neolithic Linearbandkeramik culture. Sidestone Press: Leiden, 33–52.
Hodder I. 2013. From Diffusion to Structural Transformation: the Changing Roles of the Neolithic House in the Middle East, Turkey and Europe. In D. Hofmann and J. Smyth (eds.), Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe: Sedentism, Architecture, and Practice (= One World Archaeology). New York: Springer, 349–362.
Hofmann D. 2013. Narrating the house. The transformation of longhouses in Early Neolithic Europe. In A. M. Chadwick and C. D. Gibson (eds.), Memory, myth and long-term landscape inhabitation. Oxford: Oxbow, 32–54.
Hofmann D. and Smyth J. 2013. Introduction: Dwelling, Materials, Cosmology – Transforming Houses in the Neolithic. In D. Hofmann and J. Smyth (eds.), Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe: Sedentism, Architecture, and Practice (= One World Archaeology). New York: Springer, 1–17.
Kadrow S., Posselt M., Saile T., Wąs M., Abramów J. and Golański A. 2021. Culture transformation in the Targowisko Microregion. Trends of changes among Danubian Farmers. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 73(1), 153–176. DOI: 10.23858/SA/73.2021.1.2684.
Korobkowa G. F. 1999. Narzędzia w pradziejach. Podstawy badania funkcji metodą traseologiczną. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Krystek M., Młodecka H., Polański K. and Szydłowski M. 2011. Neolityczne narzędzia z metabazytów typu Jizerske hory (Masyw Czeski) na obszarze Polski. Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego 444, 113–124.
Lenneis E. 1997. Houseforms of the central European Linear Pottery culture and of the Balkan Early Neolithic – a comparison. Documenta Praehistorica 24, 143–149.
Lenneis E. 2004. Architecture and settlement of the Early Linear Pottery Culture in East Central Europe. In A. Lukes and M. Zvelebil (eds.), LBK Dialogues. Studies in the formation of the Linear Pottery Culture (= BAR International Series 1304). Oxford: Oxbow, 151–157.
Lenneis E. 2008. Perspectives on the beginnings of the Earliest LBK in east-central Europe. In D. W. Bailey, A. Whittle and D. Hofmann (eds.), Living well together? Settlement and materiality in the Neolithic of southeast and central Europe. Oxford: Oxbow, 164–178.
Lenneis E. 2012. Zur Anwendbarkeit des rheinischen Hofplatzmodells im östlichen Mitteleuropa. In F. Kreienbrink, M. Cladders, H. Stäuble, T. Tischendorf and S. Wolfram (eds.), Siedlungsstruktur und Kulturwandel in der Bandkeramik. Beiträge der internationalen Tagung “Neue Fragen zur Bandkeramik oder alles beim Alten?!” Leipzig 23. bis 24. September 2010. Dresden: Landesamt für Archäologie, 47–52.
Li W., Pagán-Jiménez J. R., Tsoraki C., Yao L. and van Gijn A. 2020. Influence of grinding on the preservation of starch grains from rice. Archaeometry 62(1), 157–171. DOI: 10.1111/arcm.12510.
Nakamura C. 2010. Magical deposits at Çatalhöyük: a matter of time and place? In I. Hodder (ed.), Religion in the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük as a case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 300–331.
Nakamura C. and Pels P. 2014. Using “Magic” to Think from the Material: Tracing Distributed Agency, Revelation, and Concealment at Çatalhöyük. In I. Hodder (ed.), Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society: Vital Matters. Cambridge: University Press, 187–224.
Pavlů I. 2016. Linear Pottery Houses and Their Inhabitants. Open Archaeology 2, 382–397. DOI 10.1515/opar-2016-0027.
Pyzel J. 2013. Change and Continuity in the Danubian Longhouses of Lowland Poland. In D. Hofmann and J. Smyth (eds.), Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe: Sedentism, Architecture, and Practice (= One World Archaeology). New York: Springer, 183–196.
Rosenberg D. and Garfinkel Y. 2014. Sha’ar Hagolan, 4: The ground stone industry: stone working at the down of pottery production in the southern Levant. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Stäuble H. 2005. Häuser und absolute Datierung der Ältesten Bandkeramik. Bonn: Habelt
Szydłowski M. 2017. Użytkowanie surowców skalnych na obszarach poglacjalnych Polski w neolicie i początkach epoki brązu. Gdańsk: The Early Bronze Age Publishing.
Tsoraki C. 2007. Unravelling ground stone life histories: the spatial organization of stone tools and human activities at LN Makriyalos, Greece. Documenta Praehistorica 34, 289–297.
Tsoraki C. 2011. Disentangling Neolithic networks: ground stone technology, material engagements and networks of action. In A. Brysbaert (ed.), Tracing Prehistoric Social Networks through Technology: a Diachronic Perspective on the Aegean. New York, London: Routledge, 12–29.
Tsoraki C. 2016. The ground stone assemblage. In S. D. Haddow (ed.), Çatalhöyük 2016 Archive Report. Online publication: http://www.catalhoyuk.com/archive_ reports/2016, 187–191.
Tsoraki C. 2017. Ground stone technologies. In S. D. Haddow (ed.), Çatalhöyük 2017 Archive Report. Online publication: http://www.catalhoyuk.com/archive_reports/ 2017, 227–237.
Tsoraki C. 2018. The ritualisation of daily practice: exploring the staging of ritual acts at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey. In I. Hodder (ed.), Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life. Boulder: University of Colorado Press, 238–262.
Wąs M. 2021. Early Neolithic Flint Assemblages from the Targowisko Settlement Region. Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia 16, 43–62. DOI: 10.15584/anarres.2021.16.3.
Wilczyński J. 2014. Neolityczne materiały kamienne z wielokulturowego stanowiska 10, 11 w Targowisku, pow. Wielicki. In A. Zastawny (ed.), Targowisko, stan 10, 11. Osadnictwo z epoki kamienia (= Via Archaeologica. Źródła z badań wykopaliskowych na trasie autostrady A4 w Małopolsce). Kraków: Krakowski Zespół do Badań Autostrad, 459–534.
Wright K.I. 1992. A classification system for ground stone tools from the prehistoric Levant. Paléorient 18(2), 53–81.
Wright K. I. 2008. Craft production and the organization of ground stone technologies. In Y. M. Rowan and R. Ebeling (eds.), New Approaches to Old Stones. Recent Studies of Ground Stone Artifacts. London: Equinox Publishing, 130–143.
Wright K. I. 2013. The ground stone technologies of Çatalhöyük (with contributions by C. Tsoraki and R. Siddall). In I. Hodder (ed.), Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons (= Çatal Research Project 9, British Institute at Ankara Monograph 48, Monumenta Archaeologica 31). London, Los Angeles: British Institute at Ankara, 365–416.
Wright K. I. 2014. Domestication and inequality? Households, corporate groups and food processing tools at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 33, 1–33.
Zastawny A. and Grabowska B. 2014. Materiały kultury ceramiki wstęgowej rytej ze st. 10, 11 w Targowisku, pow. wielicki. In A. Zastawny (ed.), Targowisko, stan 10, 11. Osadnictwo z epoki kamienia (= Via Archaeologica. Źródła z badań wykopaliskowych na trasie autostrady A4 w Małopolsce). Kraków: Krakowski Zespół do Badań Autostrad, 63–253.
Zimmermann A. 1995. Austauschsysteme von Silexartefakten in der Bandkeramik Mitteleuropas (= Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie 26). Bonn: Habelt.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
