The role of historically shaped mentality in the persistence of the Belarusian political system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/johass.2026.1.7

Keywords:

Belarus, political system, culture, mental models, Russia

Abstract

In 2024, it was 30 years since Alexander Lukashenko came to power. Today, the Belarusian political system is classified as consolidated authoritarianism. The aim of this article is to explore whether the mentality of Belarusians is a factor supporting the persistence of the authoritarian political system in this country. The paper is based mainly on a survey of the political mentality of Belarusians conducted in 2023 as part of a project by the National Centre for Research and Development (Poland), as well as on historical analysis. We have come to the conclusion that the mental models are an important factor in persisting the Belarusian political system, but to some extent. The mental models were (in our view) especially crucial to the direction the country took in the 1990s. Later, the dictator's power and his increasingly powerful external protector – Russia – did not allow political change in Belarus, despite generational and mental changes. Today, Belarus is completely subordinated to Moscow. There will be no change to the political system in Belarus without making systemic changes in Russia first. In the current geopolitical situation in Belarus, cultural factors (mental models) are becoming less important as factors contributing to the regime's persistence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A., 2012, Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, Profile Books, London.

Astapenia R., 2016, Белорусско-российские отношения с перспективы Минска: формальный союз и фактическая дезинтеграция, „Nowa Polityka Wschodnia”, 2(11), s. 43–56.

Carr E.H., 2016, The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939. Reissued with a New Preface from Michael Cox, Palgrave Macmillan.

Davies N., 1998, Europa, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków.

Democracy Indeks, 2023, https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2023/(accessed: 17.01.2025).

Denzau A., North D.C., 1994, Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions, “Kyklos”, 1.

Eberhardt A., 2008, Gra pozorów. Stosunki rosyjsko-białoruskie 1991–2008, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, Warszawa.

Foligowski P., 1999, Białoruś trudna niepodległość, Wydawnictwo Alta2, Wrocław.

Frear M., 2019, Belarus under Lukashenka. Adaptive Authoritarianism, Routledge, London – New York.

Heller M., 1989, Maszyna i śrubki. Jak hartował się człowiek sowiecki, Wydawnictwo Pomost, Warszawa.

Heydemann S., 2008, Institutions and Economic Performance. The Abuse of Culture in New Institutional Economics, “Studies in Comparative International Development” 43(2), s. 27–52.

Hofstede Insights, 2023, https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison-tool (accessed: 25.09.2023).

Inglehart R.F., 2018, Cultural Evolution. People's Motivations are Changing and Reshaping the World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Jonson-Laird P.N., Byrne R.M.J., 1993, Précis of Deduction, “Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 16, s. 323–380.

Lane J-E., Ersson S., 2016, Culture and Politics. A Comparative Approach, Taylor & Francis, London – New York.

Marples, D.R., 1999, Belarus: A Denationalized Nation, Routledge.

Marples D.R., 2002, Motherland: Russia in the 20th Century, Routledge.

Marples, D.R., 2007, The Lukashenka Phenomenon: Elections, Propaganda, and the Foundations of Political Authority in Belarus, “Trondheim Studies on East European Cultures and Societies”.

Morgenthau H.J., Thompson K.W., Clinton D.W., 2006, Politics Among Nations, McGraw-Hill Education.

North, D.C., 1994a, Economic Performance Through Time, “The American Economic Review” 3, s. 359–368.

North D.C., 1994b, The Historical Evolution of Polities, “International Review of Law & Economics” 4, s. 381–391.

North D.C., 2005, Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton University Press, Princeton–Oxford.

Pieczewski A., Sidarava A., 2024, Why Do Regimes Arise and Persist? Belarus and the Theory of Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson, “Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics” 1(317) s. 19–33.

Pieczewski A., Sidarava A., 2025, The Clash of Civilisations? Religion as a Major Component of Cultural Differentiation on the Example of Belarus and Poland, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”, vol. 28(4), s. 69–91.

Poczobut A., 2013, System Białoruś, Wydawnictwo Helion, Gliwice.

Rudling, P.A., 2014, The Rise and Fall of Belarusian Nationalism 1906–1931, University of Pittsburgh Press.

Szybieka Z., 2002, Historia Białorusi 1795–2000, Instytut Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, Lublin.

Waltz K.N., 2001, Man, the State, and War, Columbia University Press.

Wilkin J., 2016, Instytucjonalne i kulturowe podstawy gospodarowania. Humanistyczna perspektywa ekonomii, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.

Williamson O., 2000, The new institutional economics. Taking stocks, looking ahead, “Journal of Economic Literature” 38, s. 595–613.

World Values Survey, 2023, https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSNewsShow.jsp?ID=467 (accessed: 25.09.2024).

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

Pieczewski, A., & Sidarava, A. (2026). The role of historically shaped mentality in the persistence of the Belarusian political system. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 38(1), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.15584/johass.2026.1.7

Issue

Section

Articles