The right of retention from the perspective of the impossibility of further execution of the valorized loan agreement. Gloss to the order of the Supreme Court of 17 March 2023, II CSKP 1486/22
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/actaires.2025.1.10Keywords:
denominated loan, indexed loan, charge of set-off, charge of retention, right of retention, abusive clauses, mutual settlements between partiesAbstract
The doubts resolved by the Supreme Court in this ruling arose in connection with the defendant's (bank) application of the right of retention in cases involving loans denominated/indexed to foreign currency. This issue became a contribution to answering the question of whether the right of retention is vested in the party that can set off its claim against the claim of the other party. This text is based on the presentation of the decision of the lower courts and, further, the Supreme Court. In principle, the author expressed his approval of the position presented by the Supreme Court, and additionally referred to other arguments supporting the thesis.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Acta Iuridica Resoviensia (formelry: The Scientific Journal of the University of Rzeszow, Law Series)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.