(review) S. Kadrow and J. Müller (eds.). Habitus? The Social Dimension of Technology and Transformation (= Scales and Transformation 3). Leiden 2019: Sidestone Press, 230 pages, 15 figures (bw), 65 figures (fc).

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/anarres.2021.16.9

Bibliografia

Arponen V. P. J. 2019. Habitus as a theoretical concept. In S. Kadrow and J. Muller (eds.), Habitus? The Social Dimension of Technology and Transformation (= Scales and Transformation 3). Leiden: Sidestone Press, 15–18.

Austin J. L. 1993. Jak działać słowami? In J. L Austin (ed.), Mówienie i poznawanie. Rozprawy i wykłady filozoficzne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, s. 550–708.

Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu P. 1985. The genesis of the concepts of habitus and of field. Sociocriticism 2(2), 11–24.

Brożek A. and Kasprzyk Z. 2007. O performatywach i generowaniu. Filozofia Nauki 15(2), 115–130.

Diachenko A. 2019. Does the social field cause or accelerate social and cultural changes? The case of Eneolithic Cucuteni-Tripolye cultural complex. In S. Kadrow and J. Muller (eds.), Habitus? The Social Dimension of Technology and Transformation (= Scales and Transformation 3). Leiden: Sidestone Press, 71–85.

Gaydarska B. 2019. ‘If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change’: the case of Trypillia. In S. Kadrow and J. Muller (eds.), Habitus? The Social Dimension of Technology and Transformation (= Scales and Transformation 3). Leiden: Sidestone Press, 47–69.

Giddens A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan.

Giddens A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hetmański M. 2015. Proceduralno-kognitywny charakter ideału obiektywności. Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa 51/2, 97–110.

Jeunesse Ch. 2019. Dualist socio-political systems in South East Asia and the interpretation of late prehistoric European societies. In S. Kadrow and J. Muller (eds.), Habitus? The Social Dimension of Technology and Transformation (= Scales and Transformation 3). Leiden: Sidestone Press, 181–213.

Johnston A. 2013. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lacan/ (access: 22.09.2021)

Kadrow S. and Muller J. 2019. Habitus? The social dimension of technology and transformation – an introduction. In S. Kadrow and J. Muller (eds.), Habitus? The Social Dimension of Technology and Transformation (= Scales and Transformation 3). Leiden: Sidestone Press, 11–14.

Pankowski V. 2019. The diversity in a theory of cultural genesis for the eastern European Bronze Age. In S. Kadrow and J. Muller (eds.), Habitus? The Social Dimension of Technology and Transformation (= Scales and Transformation 3). Leiden: Sidestone Press, 215–228.

Pawleta M. 2009. (review) Aleksander Dzbyński. 2008. Rytuał i porozumienie. Racjonalne podstawy komunikacji i wymiany w pradziejach Europy Środkowej/Ritual and understanding. Rational bases of communication and exchange in prehistoric Central Europe (= Collectio Archaeologica Ressoviensis 8, Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego). Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 61, 451–463.

Pawleta M. 2016. Przeszłość we współczesności. Studium metodologiczne archeologicznie kreowanej przeszłości w przestrzeni społecznej. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

Quine W. V. 2000. Dwa dogmaty empiryzmu. In W. V. Quine (ed.), Z punktu widzenia logiki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 49–77.

Reinhold S. 2019. The Maykop legacy – new social practice and new technologies in the 4th millennium BCE in the North Caucasus. In S. Kadrow and J. Muller (eds.), Habitus? The Social Dimension of Technology and Transformation (= Scales and Transformation 3). Leiden: Sidestone Press, 87–113.

Downloads

Opublikowane

2022-01-12

Jak cytować

Wolski, D. (2022). (review) S. Kadrow and J. Müller (eds.). Habitus? The Social Dimension of Technology and Transformation (= Scales and Transformation 3). Leiden 2019: Sidestone Press, 230 pages, 15 figures (bw), 65 figures (fc). Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia, 16, 157–160. https://doi.org/10.15584/anarres.2021.16.9

Numer

Dział

Omówienia i recenzje