The evolution of income and wealth inequalities in India in 1951–2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2021.4.10Keywords:
inequalities, India, developing countriesAbstract
An increasing amount of research and available data shows a clear increase in the level of inequality in worldwide terms over the past 30–40 years. In this context, India is a unique case due to the enormous ethnic and linguistic diversity and specific social institutions that have arisen over the centuries. The study is divided into three parts. The first one presents the problem of the inequalities in the contemporary world and their relationship with the processes of economic growth. The second part is devoted to an analysis of the inequalities in India in the years 1951–1989, and the third part is an analysis of this problem since 1990. The article ends with a conclusion, which briefly presents the analyses that were carried out. The study mainly uses historical analyses based on domestic and foreign literature, as well as an analysis of the existing data. According to the analyses studied, the shares of individual percentiles in income and wealth remained relatively constant throughout the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, with shares in the upper strata decreasing slightly over that time. In fact, there was an actual petrification of traditional structures and inequalities. These circumstances changed in the mid-1980s and accelerated significantly in the early 1990s along with liberal reforms based on the Washington consensus. As a result, the level of inequality has increased significantly over the past 30 years. This means that despite more than 70 years of economic reform, it was ultimately impossible to build a strong, egalitarian society. In the long run, this may lead not so much to the consolidation of the democratic system as to the emergence of a plutocracy in place of democracy, and New Delhi’s superpower ambitions will remain within the sphere of theories and plans.
References
Acharya, S., Ahluwalia, I. J., Krishna, K. L., Patnaik, I. (2006). Economic Growth in India, 1950–2000. W: K. S. Parikh (red.), Explaining Growth in South Asia (s. 123–198). New Dehli: Oxford University Press.
Acocella, N. (2002). Zasady polityki gospodarczej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Ahluwalia, M. S. (2018). India’s Economic Reforms an Appraisal. Pobrane z: http://plan ningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/speech/spemsa/msa018.pdf (2019.09.12).
Alesina, A., Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability, and investment. Eu ropean Economic Review, 40(6), 1203–1228. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2921(95)00030-5.
Alesina, A., Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465–490. DOI: 10.2307/2118470.
Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and growth in panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 5–32. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009850119329.
Bywalec, G. (2015). Reformy ekonomiczne i polityczne a rozwój gospodarczy Indii 1991–2012. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Chandra, B., Mukherjee, A., Mukherjee, M. (1999). India after Independence. New Dehli: Viking Penguin India.
Chen, S., Ravallion, M. (1997). What can new survey data tell us abort recent chang es in distribution and poverty? The World Bank Economic Review, 11(2), 357–382.DOI:10.1093/wber/11.2.357.
Deininger, K., Squire, L. (1996). A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality. World Bank Economic Review, 10(3), 565–591. DOI:10.1093/wber/10.3.565.
Dollar, D., Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor? Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 195–225. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020139631000.
Easterly, W. (1999). Life during growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 4(3), 239–276. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009882702130.
Ferreira, H. G. (1999). Inequality and economic performance. A brief overview to theories of growth and distribution. Pobrane z: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/down load?doi=10.1.1.458.7810&rep=rep1&type=pdf (2021.07.10).
Fitoussi, P. J., Saraceno, F. (2010). Europe: how deep is a crisis? Policy responses and structural factors behind diverging performances. Journal of Globalization and Development, 1(1), 1–19. DOI: 10.2202/1948-1837.1053.
Forbes, K. (2000). A reassessment of the relation between inequality and growth. Ameri can Economic Review, 90(4), 869–897. DOI: 10.1257/aer.90.4.869.
IMF World Economic Outlook. Pobrane z: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/weo (2021.07.10).
Joshi, V., Little, I. M. D. (1996). India’s Economic Reforms 1991–2001. New Dehli: Ox ford University Press.
Kowalczyk, S. (2016). Kilka uwag w sprawie teorii nierówności. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 6(4), 15–26.
Kumar, Ch. (2011). A discursive dominance theory of economic reforms sustainability: the case of India. India Review, 10(2), 126–184. DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2011.574550.
Kumar, N. P., Ladusingh, L. (2019). Discovering the Saga of Inter-caste Marriage in India.
Journal of Asian and African Studies, 54(4), 588–599. DOI: 10.1177/0021909619829896.
Li, H., Zou, H. (1998). Income inequality is not harmful for growth: theory and evidence. Review of Development Economics, 2(3), 318–334. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9361.00045.
Lopez, J. H. (2004). Pro-poor, pro-growth: Is there a trade off? The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3378. Pobrane z: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bit stream/handle/10986/14124/WPS3378.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (2021.07.10).
Maddison, A. (2006). The World Economy. Historical Statistics. Paris: Development Centre of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income distribution, and democracy: what the data say. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 149–187.
Piketty, T. (2015). Kapitał w XXI wieku. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Srinivas, Sh.V. (2018). The economic history of India. India and the International Monetary Fund 1944–2017. Pobrane z: http://nationalarchives.nic.in/sites/default/files/new/THE%20ECONOMIC%20HISTORY%20OF%20INDIA.pdf (2019.08.10).
Srinivasan, T. N. (2000). Eight Lectures on India’s Economic Reforms. New Dehli: Oxford University Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2004). Ekonomia sektora publicznego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). Cena nierówności. W jaki sposób podziały społeczne zagrażają naszej przyszłości. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
Therborn, G. (2015). Nierówność, która zabija. Jak globalny wzrost nierówności niszczy życie milionów i jak z tym walczyć? Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Virmani, A. (2001). India’s 1990–91 crisis: reforms, myths and paradoxes. Working Paper, No. 4/2001-Planning Commission.
World Bank Data Base. Pobrane z: https://data.worldbank.org/ (2021.07.10).
World Inequality Database. Pobrane z: https://wid.world/country/india/ (2021.07.10).
Woźniak, M. G. (2014). Nierówności społeczne a rozwój gospodarczy. W: B. Kłos, J. Szymańczak (red.), Nierówności społeczne w Polsce (s. 9–47). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.
Żuławska, U. (2011). Finansowanie wzrostu gospodarczego. W: R. Piasecki (red.), Ekonomia rozwoju (s. 94–100). Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.