The digital gender divide. A focus on inclusion through mobile phone use in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2021.3.2Keywords:
digital gender divide, e-inclusion, gender equality, mobile phones, internetAbstract
Due to the growing use of ICTs in all areas of life, the means to access these technologies and skills to operate them are regarded as important prerequisites for social inclusion or, more specifically, e-inclusion. In developing states, mobile connectivity has become an important way for people to access the internet since smartphones are more affordable than computers and break down such access barriers as costs of infrastructure, equipment and required skills. The aim of the article is to present the benefits and limitations of digital inclusion through mobile access from a gender perspective and to investigate the barriers to this process. The research is undertaken from an Indian perspective. The theses verified are: 1) mobile access can represent a pragmatic solution to the digital divide, including the digital gender divide, even if mobile-only internet use does not necessarily lead to complete e-inclusion, 2) due to the nature of barriers to access, the digital gender divide remains a persistent problem in India. The research methods used were literature review, analysis of statistical data, online sources and elements of a case study. Access to mobile devices and the internet are not gender-neutral in India. There are a number of root causes of the digital gender divide, including financial constraints, technological illiteracy, as well as socio-cultural norms. Therefore, government and business activities should focus on these areas.
References
Azcona, G., Valero, S. D. (2018). Making women and girls visible: Gender data gaps and why they matter. Retrieved from: https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/ 2018/12/issue-brief-making-women-and-girls-visible (2020.09.05).
Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and Knowledge Gaps: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 65–84. DOI:10.1177/0267323102017001607.
Bureau of Indian Standards (2016). Press Note No. G/9/2016-17. Retrieved from: https://www.bis.org.in/other/Mobile_Phone_Handsets_14062016.pdf (2020.09.25).
Büchi, M. (2017). Digital inequalities: differentiated internet use and social implications. Zurich: University of Zurich, Faculty of Arts. DOI: 10.5167/uzh-148989.
Castells, M. (2000). Toward a Sociology of the Network Society. Contemporary Sociology, 29(5), 693–699.
Chancel, L., Piketty, T. (2017). Indian income inequality, 1922–2015 From British Raj to Billionaire Raj? WID. World Working Paper Series, 11, 1–70. DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12439.
Correa, T., Pavez, I., Contreras, J. (2018). Digital inclusion through mobile phones? A comparison between mobile-only and computer users in internet access, skills and use. Information, Communication & Society, 23, 1074–1091. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1555270.
Friederici, N., Graham, M. (2018). The Bounded Opportunities of Digital Enterprises in Global Economic Peripheries, 14 April, 1–37. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3249499.
Gaziano, C. (1997). Forecast 2000: Widening Knowledge Gaps. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 237–264. DOI: 10.1177/107769909707400202.
GSMA. (2020). Connected Women. The Mobile Gender Gap Report 2020.
Graham, M., Hjorth, I., Lehdonvirta, V. (2019). Digital Labor and Development: Impacts of Global Digital Labor Platforms and the Gig Economy on Worker Livelihoods. In: M. Graham (Ed.), Digital Economies at global margins (pp. 269–294). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Heeks, R. (2017). A Developing Country Perspective on Employment Impacts and Standards in Online Out Crowdwork. Manchester Centre for Development Informatics. Working Paper, 71, 1–61.
Huws, U. (2001). The Making of a Cybertariat? Virtual Work in a Real World. Retrieved from: https://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5753 (2020.09.01).
Karczewski, L. (2016). Kultura i etyka biznesu oraz społeczna odpowiedzialność firm (CSR) w Indiach. Wprowadzenie do problematyki. Prakseologia, 158(1), 41–64.
Kasliwal, R. (2020). Gender and the Gig Economy: A Qualitative Study of Gig Platforms for Women Workers. ORF Issue Brief, 359, 1–14.
Keelery, J. (2020). Women in India – statistics & facts. Retrieved from: https://www.statista.com/topics/5220/women-in-india/#dossierSummary_chapter3 (2020.10.01).
KPMG in India and Google. (2017). Online education in India: 2021.
Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Where are online workers located? The international division of digital gig work. Retrieved from: https://ilabour.oii.ox.ac.uk/where-are-online-workers-located-the-international-division-of-digital-gig-work/ (2020.09.08).
McCarrick, H., Kleine, D. (2019). Digital Inclusion, Female Entrepreneurship, and the Production of Neoliberal Subjects – Views from Chile and Tanzania. In: M. Graham (Ed.), Digital Economies at global margins (pp. 103–128). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Minter, K. (2017). Negotiating labour standards in the gig economy: Airtasker and Unions New South Wales. The Economic and Labor Relations Review, 28(3), 438–454. DOI: 10.1177/1035304617724305.
MOSPI (2016). Women and Men in India – 2016. Retrieved from: http://mospi.nic.in/publication/women-and-men-india-2016 (2020.09.30).
OECD. (2011). Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising. OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264119536-en.
OECD. (2001). Understanding the Digital Divide. OECD Digital Economy Papers, 49. OECD Publishing. Paris. DOI: 10.1787/20716826.
OECD. (2018). Bridging the digital gender divide. Include, upskill, innovate. Retrieved from:https://www.oecd.org/digital/bridging-the-digital-gender-divide.pdf (2020.09.30).
OECD. (2019). Retrieved from: https://www.genderindex.org/country-profiles?region=asia (2020.09.30).
Oxfam International/ European Women’s Lobby (2010). An Invisible Crisis? Women’s poverty and social exclusion in the European Union at a time of recession. A Gender Works paper. Retrieved from: https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/an-invisible-crisis-womens-poverty-and-social-exclusion-in-the-europeanunion-a-111957/ (2020.09.01).
Panda, R. K. Socially Exclusion and Inequality: Opportunities in Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Their role in ending inequalities in India. A Position Paper on State of Socially Excluded Groups (SEGs) and Framework of Action. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/11145Social%20exclusion%20and%20Inequality-Study%20by%20GCAP%20India%20.pdf (2020.09.30).
PMJDY. (2020). Retrieved from: https://pmjdy.gov.in/ (2020.09.30).
Prabhu, J., Jain, S. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship in India: Understanding jugaad. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32, 843–868. DOI: 10.1007/s10490-015-9445-9.
Sabharwal, N. S., Henderson, E. F., Smart Joseph, R. (2020). Hidden social exclusion in Indian academia: gender, caste and conference participation. Gender and Education, 32(1), 27–42. DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2019.1685657.
Selhofer, H., Hüsing, T. (2002). The digital divide index – a measure of social inequalities in the adoption of ICT. Conference: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Information Systems, Information Systems and the Future of the Digital Economy, ECIS 2002, Gdansk, Poland, June 6–8.
Tichenor, P. J., Olien, C. N., Donohue, G. A. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159–170. DOI: 10.1086/267786.
Tiwari, R., Herstatt, C. (2012). Open Global Innovation Networks as Enablers of Frugal Innovation: Propositions Based on Evidence from India. Hamburg University of Technology, Technology and Innovation Management, Working Paper, 72. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2196080.
Trans World Features (2017). Internet Saathi: A friend in need. Retrieved from: https://www.indiablooms.com/life-details/F/2815/internet-saathi-a-friend-in-need.html (2020.10.01).
Tusińska, M. (2020). Inequality of opportunity – gender bias in education in Pakistan. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy (Social Inequalities and Economic Growth), 63(3), 233–245. DOI: 10.15584/nsawg.2020.3.11.
UNDP. (2013). Retrieved from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index (2020.09.01).
Weyrauch, T., Herstatt, C. (2017). What is frugal innovation? Three defining criteria. Journal of Frugal Innovation, 2(1), 1–17. DOI: 10.1186/s40669-016-0005-y.
World Bank. (2020). Retrieved from: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/gender-statistics/preview/on# (2020.09.01).
World Economic Forum. (2020). Global Gender Gap Report 2020. Retrieved from: http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2020/dataexplorer/#economy=IND (2020.10.15).
World Wide Web Foundation. (2020a). Retrieved from: https://webfoundation.org/research/from-luxury-to-lifeline-reducing-the-cost-of-mobile-devices-to-reach-universal-internet-access/ (2020.10.15).
World Wide Web Foundation. (2020b). Women’s rights online. Closing the digital gender gap for a more equal. Retrieved from: https://webfoundation.org/research/womens-rights-online-2020/ (2020.10.15).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
