The The Socio-Cultural Background of the Genesis of the Lublin-Volhynia Culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/anarres.2024.19.3Słowa kluczowe:
Lublin-Volhynian culture, genesis, socio-cultural background, Early Eneolithic Cultural Complex, Cucuteni-Trypillia Cultural Complex, Polgar cultureAbstrakt
The direct sources for the study of the origin of many constitutive elements of the Lublin-Volhynian culture (hereafter: L-VC) from various and sometimes distant areas of a culturally diverse nature prompt us to outline the cultural situation in the second half of the 5th millennium BC , and especially in the final phase, in the vast areas of Southeastern Europe and adjacent parts of Eastern Europe. The rationale behind such a move is to help understand this culture and its multifaceted origins. Like a “posthumous child”, it appeared at the last moment of the existence of some cultures belonging to the same cultural complex, i.e., the Early Eneolithic Cultural Complex (hereafter: EECC ), at the latest around 4100 BC . Paradoxically, the Cucuteni-Trypillia Cultural Complex (hereafter: CTCC ) in its younger part of the BI phase (4230–4100 BC ; cf. Diachenko et al. 2024), with a socio-cultural profile distant from the EECC , seems to be the leading “source” of the constitutive elements of the new culture, i.e. the L-VC. The CTCC was the only cultural entity that did not disappear during this period but rather expanded rapidly.
Bibliografia
Agapov S. A. (ed.) 2010. Hvalynskie èneolitičeskie mogil´niki i hvalynskaâ èneolitičeskaâ kul´tura. Issledovaniâ materialov. Samara: Povolž´e.
Agapov S. A., Vasil´ev I. B. and Pestrikova V. I. 1990. Hvalynskij èneolitičeskij mogil´nik. Saratov: Izdatel´stvo Saratovskogo universiteta.
Anthony D. W., Khokhlov A. A., Agapov S. A., Agapov D. S., Schulting R., Olalde I. and Reich D. 2022. The Eneolithic cemetery at Khvalynsk on the Volga River. Praehistorische Zeitschrift 97(1), 22–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pz-2022-2034
Barker C. 2005. Studia kulturowe. Teoria i praktyka. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Borić D. 2015. Mortuary practices, bodies and persons in the Neolithic and Early-Middle Copper Age of southeast Europe. In C. Fowler, J. Harding and D. Hofmann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 927–957.
Czarniak K. 2012. Młodsze kultury cyklu naddunajskiego w Polsce południowo-zachodniej. Szczecin, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Mediatour.
Dergachev V. and Parnov V. 2022. Kondrickij klad / The Condriţa Hoard. Kišinèu, Butučen´ / Chişinău, Butuceni: ÎS Tipografia Centrală.
Diachenko A. and Harper T. K. 2016. The absolute chronology of Late Tripolye sites: a regional approach. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 68, 81–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23858/SA68.2016.005
Diachenko A., Harper T. K., Chernovol D. K, Bodean S., Levinzon Y., Rassamakin Y. Y., Sokhatskyi M. P., Shumova V. A., Eccles L. R., Kennett D. J. and Sobkowiak-Tabaka I. 2024. Testing scale-dependent temporal and spatial biases in relative chronology using AMS 14C dating: A case study of Early–Middle Cucuteni-Tripolye sites in Southeastern Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 55, 1–13. DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104495
Drummer C. 2022. Vom Kollektiv zum Individuum. Transformationsprocesse am Übergang vom 4. zum 3. Jahrtausend v. Chr. in der deutschen Mittelgebirgszone (= Scales of Transformation in Prehistoric and Archaic Societies 13). Leiden: Sidestone Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59641/n6346qz
Głosik J. and Gurba J. 1963. Ogólne wyniki prac archeologicznych w Strzyżowie, pow. Hrubieszów, w 1961 r. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 15, 358–365.
Govedarica B. and Manzura I. 2019. The Giurgiuleşti Cemetery in Chronological and Cultural Context of Southeastern and Eastern Europe. Eurasia Antiqua 22, 1–39.
Harper T. K. 2019. Demography and climate in Late Eneolithic Ukraine, Moldova, and Romania: multiproxy evidence and pollen-based regional corroboration. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 23, 973–982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.06.010
Harper T. K. 2021. The absolute chronology of Tripolye settlements in the southern Bug-Dnieper and middle Dnieper regions, ca. 4200–2950 BC . In A. Diachenko, T. K. Harper, Y. Rassamakin and I. Sobkowiak-Tabaka (eds.), Data systematization in the Neo-Eneolithic of Southeastern and Central Europe: Essays in honor of Sergej Ryzhov. Kyiv: Institute of Archaeology National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 59–78.
Häusler A. 1994. Grab- und Bestattungssitten des Neolithikums und der frühen Bronzezeit in Mitteleuropa. Zeitschrift für Archaologie 28, 23–61.
Hillebrandt J. 1929. A Pusztaistvánházi korarézkori temető / Das frühkupferzeitliche Gräberfeld von Pusztaistvánháza (= Archaeologia Hungarica 4). Budapest: Franklin-Társulat Nyomdája.
Ivanov I. 1988a. Die Ausgrabungen des Gräberfeldes von Varna. In A. Fol and J. Lichardus (eds.), Macht, Herrschaft und Gold. Saarbrücken: Moderne Galerie des Saarland Museum, 49–66.
Ivanov I. 1988b. Das Gräberfeld von Varna – Katalog. In A. Fol and J. Lichardus (eds.), Macht, Herrschaft und Gold. Saarbrücken: Moderne Galerie des Saarland Museum, 183–208.
Kadrow S. 2008. Uwagi na temat możliwości archeologicznej identyfikacji władzy i panowania w świetle wybranych teorii ewolucji społecznej. In J. Bednarczyk, J. Czebreszuk, P. Makarowicz and M. Szmyt (eds.), Na pograniczu światów. Studia z pradziejów międzymorza bałtycko-pontyjskiego ofiarowane Profesorowi Aleksandrowi Kośko w 60. rocznicę urodzin. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 191–202.
Kadrow S. 2015. The Idea of the Eneolothic. In K. Kristiansen, L. Šmejda and J. Turek (eds.), Paradigm Found. Archaeological Theory Present, Past and Future. Essays in Honour of Evžen Neustupný. Oxford, Philadelphia: Oxbow Book, 248–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dpc1.23
Kadrow S. 2017. What Happened in Iwanowice at the End of the 3rd Millennium BC ? Did a Rebellion Break Out? In S. Hansen and J. Müller (eds.), Rebellion and Inequality in Archaeology. Proceedings of the Kiel Workshops “Archaeology of Rebellion” (2014) and “Social Inequality as a Topic in Archaeology” (2015) (= Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie 308). Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, 171–184.
Kadrow S. and Zakościelna A. 2000. Outline of the Evolution of Danubian Cultures in Małopolska and Western Ukraine. In A. Kośko (ed.), The western border area of the Tripolye culture (= Baltic-Pontic Studies 3). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University, Institute of Eastern Studies, Institute of Prehistory, 157–255.
Kadrow S. and Zakościelna A. 2022a. The origin of the trough retouch in the Lublin-Volhynian culture. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 74(1), 157–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23858/SA/74.2022.1.3051
Kadrow S. and Zakoscielna A. 2022b. Eneolithisation from the steppes. A case study on Volhynia. Światowit 61, 266–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/0082-044X.swiatowit.61.12
Kadrow S. and Zakościelna A. 2024. In print. Two currents of the Eneolithisation of upland loess areas in the northern foreland of the Carpathian Mountains. Kadrow S. and Zakościelna A. 2025. In print. The eastern and western zones of the Lublin-Volhynian culture.
Klimscha F. 2016. Pietrele 1: Beile und Äxte aus Stein. Distinktion und Kommunikation während der Kupferzeit im östlichen Balkangebiet (= Archäologie in Eurasien 34). Bonn: Habelt-Verlag.
Kruc V. O. and Rižov S. M. 1997. Verhn´odnìprovs´ka lokal´na grupa pam’âtok tripìl´skoï kul´turi ta novì danì pro zvʼâzki tripìl´cìv z naselennâm polgars´koï ì lendel´s´koï kul´tur. Arheologìâ 2, 23–32.
Kruk J. and Milisauskas S. 1985. Bronocice. Osiedle obronne ludności kultury lubelsko-wołyńskiej (2800–2700 lat p.n.e.). Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Lichardus J. 1991. Die Kupferzeit als historische Epoche: Versuch einer Deutung. In J. Lichardus (ed.), Die Kupferzeit als historische Epoche. Symposium Saarbrückenund Otzenhausen 6.–13.11.1988 (= Saarbrücker Beiträge zur Altertumskund 55). Bonn: Habelt, 763–800.
Lichter C. 2001. Untersuchungen zu den Bestattungssitten des südosteuropäischen Neolithikums und Chalkolithikums (= Heidelberger Akademie dcr Wissenschaften. Internationale Interakademische Kommission für die Erforschung der Vorgeschichte des Balkans. Monographien 5). Mainz am Rhein: Verlag Philipp von Zabern.
Müller J., Kirleis W. and Taylor N. (eds.) 2024. Perspectives on Socio-environmental Transformations in Ancient Europe. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-53314-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53314-3
Müller J., Rassmann K. and Videiko M. (eds.) 2016. Trypillia mega-sites and European prehistory: 4100–3400 BCE. London, New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315630731
Neustupný E. 2008. Všeobecny přehled eneolitu. In E. Neustupný, M. Dobeš, J. Turek and M. Zápotocký (eds.), Archeologie pravĕkých Čech, 4: Eneolit. Praha: Archeologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i., 11–38.
Nevizánsky G. 1984. Sozialökonomische Verhältnisse in der Polgár-Kultur Aufgrund der Gräberfelderanalyse. Slovenská archeológia 32(2), 263–310.
Patay P. 1976. A magyarhomorogi rézkori temetö. A Debreceni Déri Múzeum Évkönyve 56, 173–254.
Patay P. 1978. Das kupferzeitliche Gräberfeld von Tiszavalk-Kenderföld. Budapest, München: Akademiai Kiadö, C.H. Beck Verlag.
Peeples M. A. 2018. Connected communities: networks, identity, and social change in the ancient Cibola World. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ws7wrq
Popescu G. M., Covătaru C., Opriş I., Bălăşescu A., Carozza L., Radu V., Haită C., Sava T., Barton C.M. and Lazăr C. 2023. Sine qua non: inferring Kodjadermen-Gumelnița-Karanovo VI population dynamics from aggregated probability distributions of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 65, 463–484. DOI: 10.1017/RDC.2023.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2023.6
Rassamakin Y. 1999. The Eneolithic of the Black Sea Steppe: Dynamics of Cultural and Economic Development 4500–2300 BC . In M. Livine, Y. Rassamakin, A. Kislenko and N. Tatarintseva (eds.), Late prehistoric exploitation of the Eurasian steppe. Cambridge: Mc-Donald Institute for Archaeological Research, 59–182.
Rassamakin Y. 2004. Die nordpontische Steppe in der Kupferzeit. Gräber aus der Mitte des 5. Jts. bis Ende des 4. Jts. v.Chr. 2: Katalog. Tafeln (= Archäologie in Eurasien 17). Mainz: Verlag Phillip von Zabern.
Sałacińska B. and Zakościelna A. 2007. Pierwsze groby kultur ceramik wstęgowych w Polsce. Groby kultury lubelsko-wołyńskiej ze stanowiska Złota „Grodzisko I” i „Grodzisko II”. Wiadomości Archeologiczne 59, 77–114.
Shatilo L. 2021. Tripolye Typo-Chronology. Mega and Smaller Sites in the Sinyukha River Basin (= Scales of Transformation in Prehistoric and Archaic Societies 12). Leiden: Sidestone Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59641/m5457py
Spielmann K. A., Peeples M. A., Glowacki D. M. and Dugmore A. 2016. Early Warning Signals of Social Transformation: A Case Study from the US Southwest. PLoS ONE 11(10), 1–18. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163685
Šiška S. 1964. Pohrebisko tiszapolgárskej kultury v Tibave. Slovenská archeológia 12(2), 293–356.
Tkačuk T. 2023. Ceramic “Imports” and Imitation of the Culture of Tiszapolgár and Bodrogkeresztúr at the Sites of Trypillia-Cucuteni Culture. Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia 18, 67–81. DOI: 10.15584/anarres.2023.18.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15584/anarres.2023.18.4
Todorova H. 2002. Die archäologische Geschlechtsbestimmung. In H. Todorova (ed.), Durankulak, 2: Die prähistorischen Gräberfleder von Durankulak, 1. Sofia: Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, 53–60.
Vizdal J. 1977. Tiszapolgárske pohrebisko vo Veľkých Raškovciach. Košice: Věchodoslovenskeě vydavatelstvo.
Weber M. 2002. Gospodarka i społeczeństwo. Zarys socjologii rozumiejącej. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Wilk S. 2016. New data about chronology of the impact of the Hunyadihalom-Lažňany horizon on Younger Danubian cultures north of the Carpathian Mountains. Recherches Archéologiques Nouvelle Serie 8, 7–27.
Wilk S. 2018. Can we talk about the Copper Age in Lesser Poland? Contribution to the discussion. In P. Valde-Nowak, K. Sobczyk, M. Nowak and J. Źrałka (eds.), Multas per gentes et multa per saecula. Amici magistro et collegae suo Ioanni Christopho Kozłowski dedicant. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Alter, 485–494.
Wuthnow R. 1987. Meaning and moral order. Explorations in cultural analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zakościelna A. 2010. Studium obrządku pogrzebowego kultury lubelsko-wołyńskiej. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.
