Gloss to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 4 August 2005 (II kk 215/05)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/actaires.2022.1.20

Keywords:

court judgment, license, responsibility, payment, production

Abstract

This gloss discusses the controversy whether the term in contravention of the conditions of the authorisation used in Art. 116 of the Act of 4 February 1994 on copyright and related rights (Dz.U. 2000, No. 80, Item 904, as amended) refers only to the rights granted under the licence to distribute the work, and not also to obligations arising from the licence agreement (e.g. the right to remuneration or the obligation to present financial statements).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-31

How to Cite

Nowak, A. . (2022). Gloss to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 4 August 2005 (II kk 215/05). Acta Iuridica Resoviensia (formelry: The Scientific Journal of the University of Rzeszow, Law Series), 36(118), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.15584/actaires.2022.1.20

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 118 (2022)

Section

Glosses

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Iuridica Resoviensia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.