Jerzy Nowosielski as a “bilingual” painter. Relations between abstraction and icon in monumental religious projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/setde.2020.13.4Keywords:
Jerzy Nowosielski, sacred art, icon, murals, Byzantine tradition, abstraction, avant-garde, subtle bodiesAbstract
The sacred art of Jerzy Nowosielski, an outstanding Polish painter of the second half of the 20th century, is an example of the creative continuation of the Byzantine tradition in Poland, but also an embodiment of the debate with the painting tradition of the East and with the experience of the Church. Both in theory and in painting practice, the artist redefined the concept of the icon, attempting to expand its formula so that it not only spoke of the Kingdom, but also included the image of the earthly, imperfect reality of the pilgrim Church. In his designs of sacred interiors for churches of various Christian denominations, Nowosielski wanted to combine three theological disciplines and their respective ways of representation: Christology, sophiology and angelology. Beside a classical icon, called by the painter a “Christological-Chalcedonian” icon, Nowosielski demanded a “sophiological” icon, bringing into the space of a church an earthly, painful reality, traces of inner struggle and doubt - hence the presence of doloristic motifs in his icons. The “inspired geometry” also became a complement to the holy images; the artist noticed a huge spiritual potential in abstract painting, to which he eventually assigned the role of icon painting. The poetic concept of “subtle bodies” - abstract angels testifying to the reality of the spiritual world - drew from the early Christian theological thought, which argued about the corporeality of spiritual entities, from Byzantine angelology, the tradition of theosophy and occultism, but also from the art of the first avant-garde, especially that from Eastern Europe, which inherited the Orthodox cult of the image. Nowosielski’s bilingualism as a painter - practicing abstraction and figuration in tandem, also within the church - paralleled the liturgical practice of many religious communities using different languages to express different levels of reality: human affairs and divine affairs. The tradition of apophatic theology, proclaiming the truth about the “unrepresentability” of God, was also important in shaping Nowosielski’s ideas. For Nowosielski’s monumental art, the problem of the mutual relationship between painting and architecture proved crucial. The artist based his concept on the decisive domination of painting over architecture and the independence of monumental painting. His goal was the principle of creating a sacred interior as a holistic, comprehensive vision of space which leads the participants of liturgy “out of everyday life” and into a different, transcendent dimension, in which the painter saw the main purpose of sacred art. From his first projects from the 1950s till the end of his artistic practice Nowosielski tried to realize his own dream version of the “ideal church”. In many of his projects he introduced abstraction into the temple, covering the walls, vaults, presbyteries, sometimes even the floors with a network of triangular “subtle bodies”. Forced to compromise, he introduced sacred abstraction into murals, as accompanying geometries, or into stained glass windows. The interiors, comprehensively and meticulously planned, were supposed to create the effect of “passing through”, “rending the veil” - from behind which a new, heavenly reality dawned. In practice, it was not always possible to achieve this intention, but the artist’s aim was to create an impression of visual unity, a sense of “entering the painting”, of being immersed in the element of painting. Painting in space was supposed to unite a broken world, to combine physical and spiritual reality into an integral whole. When designing sacred interiors, Nowosielski used the sanctity of the icon, but also the pure qualities of painting which were to cause a “mystical feeling of God’s reality”. The aim of sacred art understood in such a way turned out to be initiation rather than teaching. In this shift of emphasis Nowosielski saw the only chance for the revival of sacred art, postulating even a shift of the burden of evangelization from verbal teaching to the work of charismatic art.References
Ałpatow M., Rublow, tłum. J. Guze, Warszawa 1975.
Bałus W., Czego chcą ornamenty?, w: Ornament i dekoracja dzieła sztuki. Studia z historii sztuki, red. J. Daranowska-Łukaszewska, A. Dworzak, A. Betlej, Warszawa 2015.
Bednarczuk E., Tvorčij individualizm Ûriâ Novoselskogo, „Naša Kultura” 1960, nr 10.
Białopiotrowicz W., Z problemów ikony karpackiej, w: Chrześcijański Wschód a kultura polska, red. R. Łużny, Lublin 1989.
Bułgakow S., Drabina Jakubowa. Rzecz o aniołach, tłum. T.P. Terlikowski, Warszawa 2005.
Czajkowski J., Grządziela R., Szczepkowski A., Ikona karpacka, Sanok 1998.
Czerni K., Nietoperz w świątyni. Biografia Jerzego Nowosielskiego, Kraków 2011.
Dionizy Areopagita, O hierarchii niebiańskiej, w: Dzieła Świętego Dionizyusza Areopagity, tłum., przedmowa i wstęp E. Bułhak, Kraków 1932.
Evdokimov P., Życie duchowe w mieście, tłum. M. Żurowska, Poznań 2011.
Gelitovič M., Ukraïnskì Ìkoni XIII – počatku XVI stolit’, Kiïv 2014.
Hammerstein R., Die Musik der Engel. Untersuchungen zur Musikanschaung des Mittelalters, Bern–München 1962.
Jamie J., Muzyka sfer: o muzyce, nauce i naturalnym porządku wszechświata, tłum. M. Godyń, Kraków 1996.
Juszczak W., Występny ornament, „Znak” 1993, nr 11.
Kiilerich B., Abstraction in Late Antique Art, w: Envisioning Worlds in Late Antique Art: New Perspectives on Abstraction and Symbolism in Late–Roman and Early–Byzantine Visual Culture (c. 300–600), ed. C. Olovsdotter, Berlin 2018.
Kłosińska J., Ikony karpackie, w: Malarstwo Jerzego Nowosielskiego. Karpackie obrazy kultowe, katalog wystawy, Muzeum Archidiecezji Warszawskiej, 5 X – 9 XI 1985.
Kruk M.P., Ikony Jerzego Nowosielskiego w Kaplicy świętych Borysa i Gleba przy Fundacji św. Włodzimierza w Krakowie, w: Światło Wschodu w przestrzeni gotyku. Materiały pokonferencyjne, red. K. Pasławska-Iwanczewska, Górowo Iławeckie 2013.
Marion J-L., Bóg bez bycia, tłum. M. Frankiewicz, Kraków 1996.
Merton T., Szukanie Boga, tłum. P. Parlej i in., Kraków 1983.
Naumow A., Aniołowie w prawosławiu, w: Księga o Aniołach, red. H. Oleschko, Kraków 2002.
Nowosielski J., Listy i zapomniane wywiady, Kraków 2015.
Nowosielski J., Między Kaabą a Partenonem, „Znak” 1968, nr 7-8.
Nowosielski J., Sztuka po końcu świata. Rozmowy, Kraków 2012.
Nowosielski J., Zagubiona bazylika. Refleksje o sztuce i wierze, Kraków 2013.
Onians J., Abstraction and imagination in late antiquity, „Art Journal” 1980, vol. 3, no 1.
Otto R., Świętość. Elementy irracjonalne w pojęciu bóstwa i ich stosunek do elementów racjonalnych, tłum. B. Kupis, Wrocław 1993.
Panas W., Rozmowa o Nowosielskim, w: Jerzy Nowosielski. Malarstwo, katalog wystawy, Galeria Sztuki Sceny Plastycznej KUL, luty 1988, Lublin 1988.
Paprocki H., Rosyjska sofiologia, w: Gnostycyzm antyczny i współczesna neognoza, red. W. Myszor, „Studia Antiquitatis Christianae”, t. 12, Warszawa 1996.
Paprocki H., Związki między ikoną, teologią i liturgią [publ. 16.10.2011], http://liturgia.cerkiew.pl/texty.php?id_n=142&id=114 [dostęp 16 IV 2016].
Podgórzec Z., Rozmowy z Jerzym Nowosielskim, Kraków 2014.
Popiel J., Zagadnienie sakralnego wyrazu sztuki chrześcijańskiej, „Znak” 1964, nr 12.
Poprzęcka M., Między koniecznym a niemożliwym. O próbach nowej ikonografii religijnej, „W Drodze” 1989, nr 3.
Potkaj T., Modlitwa w malowanej desce, „Tygodnik Powszechny” 2002, nr 20.
Press G., Subtle Bodies. Representing Angels in Byzantium, Berkeley–Los Angeles–London 2001.
Puskás B., Między Wschodem a Zachodem. Ikony z regionu Karpat z XV–XVIII wieku, w: Łemkowie w historii i kulturze Karpat, red. J. Czajkowski, Sanok 1994.
Różycka-Bryzek A., Wyobrażenia aniołów w bizantyńsko-ruskich malowidłach kaplicy Św. Trójcy na zamku w Lublinie (1418), „Folia Historiae Artium” XIII, 1977.
Rudenko O., Jerzy Nowosielski – malarz świecki czy religijny?, „Kresy” 2000, nr 4.
Stróżewski W., O możliwości sacrum w sztuce, w: Sacrum i sztuka, red. N. Cieślińska, Kraków 1989.
Waniek H., Jak to było z Nowosielskim?, „Twórczość” 2011, nr 10.
Waniek H., Sztuka jako świętość i grzeszność, „Konteksty” 1996, nr 3-4.
Warland R., Defining Space: Abstraction, Symbolism and Allegory on Display in Early Byzantine Art, w: Envisioning Worlds in Late Antique Art: New Perspectives on Abstraction and Symbolism in Late–Roman and Early–Byzantine Visual Culture (c. 300–600), ed. C. Olovsdotter, Berlin 2018.
Wodziński C., Trans, Dostojewski, Rosja, czyli o filozofowaniu siekierą, Gdańsk 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Sacrum et Decorum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In line with the Open Access policy, authors retain full copyright to their articles – without restrictions.
Authors can deposit their articles in a repository of their choice.