Maurice Denis – between the avant-garde and religious art

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/setde.2024.17.4

Keywords:

symbolism, Nabism, theme in a work of art, autonomisation of painting, religious art

Abstract

Maurice Denis is better known as an opinion-forming theoretician than as a religious artist and a tireless propagator of modern sacred art. His rich critical legacy includes essays on contemporary artists, exhibition reviews, art manifestos, and studies of the history of sacred art. His oeuvre illustrates a continuous dialogue between tradition and modernity, conducted both at the level of theory and artistic practice. The French artist was a deeply religious man who was aware of his mission in the field of art from an early age. Even in the most radical period of his work, proclaiming the superiority of artistic means of influence over illusionistically expressed anecdote, he addressed religious themes. Maurice Denis came to the belief that every outstanding work of art is symbolic, filled with mystical spirit, because it reflects the universal harmony that is the work of the Creator. His admiration for the oeuvre of Byzantine masters, the works of Italian primitives, the refined paintings of Poussin and then Puvis de Chavannes, found a natural continuation in his fascination with the discoveries of Gauguin and Cézanne. New classicism opened the next stage in his work and critical reflection. The artist managed to combine the modern form of expression with at love of tradition and spirituality, not only of religious provenance. It is the relationship between art, nature and religion that constitutes the most important theme in the artist’s reflections. Like other Nabis, Maurice Denis expressed himself in many artistic techniques and disciplines; aware of the need to shape taste, he attached great importance to applied art. He played a significant role in creating the foundations for modern sacred art, not only through his own works, but also through his activity in the field of Ateliers d'art sacré. It is worth studying the texts of Denis as a theoretician in order to see how the artist managed to fine-tune 20th century consciousness and innovative means of expression to convey profound mystical experiences, thus permanently contributing to the modernisation of religious art.

 

Author Biography

Małgorzata Dąbrowska, independent scientist

Małgorzata Dąbrowska is a graduate of the Jagiellonian University (Roman Studies, Art History) and Sorbonne. At the Université Paris-X, Nanterre, she defended with distinction her Ph.D. thesis entitled “Polish Sculptors and France. Between French influences and the search for a national style.” She is a scholarship holder of the De Brzezie Lanckoronski Foundation (2015), the Ministry of Culture (2016), the Historical and Literary Society in Paris (2020), and the French government (2000, 2008). She is the author of the books Instytucje sztuki wspólczesnej w Polsce i we Francji. Analiza studiów przypadków [Contemporary art institutions in Poland and France. Analysis of case studies] (2013) and Środowisko akademickie krakowskiej rzeźby 1819 - 2019 [The academic milieu of Krakow sculpture 1819 – 2019]. She specialises in the history of 19th- and 20th-century sculpture as well as the economics and marketing of culture.

References

Aurier A., Symboliści (1892), w: Moderniści o sztuce, red. E. Grabska-Wallis, Warszawa 1971, s. 352–366.

Bouillon J.-P., Maurice Denis: le spirituel dans l`art, Paris 2006.

Bouillon J.-P., Maurice Denis; six essais, Paris 2006.

Maurice Denis 1870–1943, katalog wystawy w Musée d`Orsay (31 października 2006 do 21 stycznia 2007, Montréal, Musée des Beaux-arts, 22 lutego do 20 maja 2007, Rovereto, Museo di arte moderna e contemporanea di Trento e Rovereto, 23 czerwca do 23 września 2007), praca zbiorowa.

Maurice Denis. Amour. 1888–1918, katalog wystawy, która odbyła się w Musée cantonal w Lozannie (12 lutego do 16 maja 2021), red. F. Stahl, J.-P. Bouillon, I. Cahn, Paris 2021.

Maurice Denis. Bonheur rêvé, katalog wystawy, która odbyła się w Saint-Germain-en-Laye w Musée départemental Maurice Denis (18 września 2021 do 29 maja 2022), red. F. Stahl, Paris 2021.

Denis M., De la gaucherie des primitifs (pierwsze wydanie w 1904 roku), w: M. Denis Théories 1890–1910. Du symbolisme et de Gauguin vers un nouvel ordre classique, Paris 1913, trzecie wydanie, s. 167–173.

Denis M., Dernier état de l'art chrétien et l'école d'art sacré, Nouvelles théories sur l'art moderne, sur l'art sacré. 1914–1921, Paris 1922, s. 259–287.

Denis M., De van Gogh et de Gauguin au classicisme, w: M. Denis, Théories 1890–1910. Du symbolisme et de Gauguin vers un nouvel ordre classique, trzecie wydanie, s. 254–270, Od Gauguina i van Gogha do klasycyzmu, Artyści o sztuce. Od van Gogha do Picassa, red. E. Grabska, H. Morawska, Warszawa 1969, s. 77–87.

Denis M., L'esthétique de Beuron, opublikowany po raz pierwszy w 1905 roku, w: M. Denis, Théories 1890–1910. Du symbolisme et de Gauguin vers un nouvel ordre classique, Paris 1913, trzecie wydanie, s. 178–180.

Denis M., La définition du néotraditionnisme, opublikowany po raz pierwszy w 1890 roku, w: M. Denis, Théories 1890–1910. Du symbolisme et de Gauguin vers un nouvel ordre classique, Paris 1913, trzecie wydanie, s. 1–13, fragmenty tekstu w: Artyści o sztuce, red. E. Grabska, H. Morawska, Warszawa 1969, s. 71–76.

Denis M., Histoire de l`art religieux, Paris 1939.

Denis M., L`importance du sujet dans la peinture religieuse, wykład wygłoszony przez artystę i przedrukowany w Questions liturgiques et paroissiales wydanych w Leuvain, w: Maurice Denis et la Belgique 1890–1939, red. C. Verleysen, Leuwen 2010.

Denis M., Journal. tom I : "1884–1904" ; tom II : "1905–1920" ; tom III : "1921–1943", Paris 1957.

Denis M., Notes sur la peinture religieuse, opublikowany po raz pierwszy w 1896 roku , w: M. Denis, Théories 1890–1910. Du symbolisme et de Gauguin vers un nouvel ordre classique, Paris 1913, trzecie wydanie, s. 30–43.

Denis M., Nouvelles théories sur l'art moderne, sur l'art sacré. 1914–1921, Paris 1922.

Denis M., Le symbolisme dans l'art religieux moderne, w: Nouvelles théories sur l`art moderne, sur l`art sacré, Paris 1922, s. 168–193.

Denis M., Théories 1890–1910. Du symbolisme et de Gauguin vers un nouvel ordre classique, Paris 1913, trzecie wydanie.

Dorival B., Les peintres du vingtième siècle. Nabis-fauves-cubistes, Paris, Editions, Pierre Tisne, 1957.

Gamboni D., "Le symbolisme en peinture" et la littérature, : "Revue de l'Art", 1992, n°96. s. 13-23, dostęp elektroniczny maj 2023: www.persee.fr./doc/rvart_0035-1326_1992_num_96_1_347981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/rvart.1992.347981

Grabska E., Morawska H. (red.), Artyści o sztuce. Od van Gogha do Picassa, Warszawa 1969.

Grabska E.(red.), Moderniści o sztuce, Warszawa, 1971.

Jamot P., Maurice Denis, Plon, Paris 1945.

Lenz P., Denis M. (préface), Sérusier P. (traduction), L'esthétique de Beuron, Paris 1905.

Mauclair C., Trois crises de l`art actuel, Paris 1906.

Morehead A., Defending deformation. Maurice Denis’s Positivist Modernism, “Art History”, vol. 38, 2015, November, Issue 5, s. 890–915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8365.12146

Stock K., Maurice Denis's Mission: to Reveal the Continuity between Byzantinism and Modernism, w: "Byzantium in Dialogue with the Mediterranean", w: "The Medieval Mediterranean”, vol. 116, Luty 2016, s. 245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004393585_014

Verleysen C., Maurice Denis et la Belgique 1890–1939, Leuwen 2010.

Published

2024-10-10

How to Cite

Dąbrowska, M. (2024). Maurice Denis – between the avant-garde and religious art. Sacrum Et Decorum, (17). https://doi.org/10.15584/setde.2024.17.4

Issue

Section

STUDIES