“Jimmy didn’t envy him. (He envied him.)”: Social and personal consequences  of liberal eugenics in Margaret Atwood’s "MaddAddam" trilogy

Sławomir Kozioł

doi:10.15584/tik.2024.29

Autor

Sławomir Kozioł Uniwersytet Rzeszowski https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0771-2118

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15584/tik.2024.29

Słowa kluczowe:

Margaret Atwood, trylogia MaddAddam, eugenika liberalna, Jürgen Habermas

Abstrakt

Artykuł interpretuje trylogię MaddAddam Margaret Atwood jako ważny, krytyczny głos w debacie dotyczącej eugeniki liberalnej, czyli genetycznego programowania dzieci, które jest regulowane wyłącznie poprzez rynkowe siły popytu i podaży. Argumentując, że trylogia Atwood wskazuje potencjalne efekty eugeniki liberalnej zarówno w zakresie funkcjonowania społeczeństwa jak i w przypadku jednostkowego poczucia tożsamości, artykuł odnosi się do teoretycznych tekstów z zakresu bioetyki, psychologii społecznej i antropologii, ale głównym źródłem argumentacji jest filozofia Jürgena Habermasa.

Downloads

Bibliografia

Atwood M., Arguing Against Ice Cream: Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age by Bill McKibben [in:] In Other Worlds: SF and the Human Imagination, New York: Doubleday, 2011, pp. 128-140.

Atwood M., MaddAddam, London: Virago, 2013.

Atwood M. Oryx and Crake, London: Hachette Digital, 2009 (2003).

Atwood M., The Year of the Flood. London: Hachette Digital, 2010 (2009).

Bergthaller H., Hannes, Housebreaking the Human Animal: Humanism and the Problem of Sustainability in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood, “English Studies”, Vol. 91, No. 7, 2010, pp. 728-43.

Buchanan A., Better than Human: The Promise and Perils of Enhancing Ourselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Buchanan A., D. W. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler, From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Canavan G., 2012. Hope, But Not for Us: Ecological Science Fiction and the End of the World in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood, “Literature Interpretation Theory”, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2012, pp. 138-59.

Canguilhem G., The Normal and the Pathological, translated by Carolyn R. Fawcett and Robert S. Cohen, New York: Zone Books, 1991.

Cooper M., Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Washington: University of Washington Press, 2008.

Dumit J., Prescription Maximization and the Accumulation of Surplus Health in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The BioMarx Experiment, [in:] Lively Capital: Biotechnologies, Ethics, and Governance in Global Markets, K. Sunder Rajan (ed.), Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2012, pp. 45-92.

Ferreira M. A., “Toward a Science of Perfect Reproduction”?: Visions of Eugenics in Contemporary Fiction, [in:] Restoring the Mystery of the Rainbow: Literature’s Refraction of Science, V. Tinkler-Villani and C. C. Barfoot (eds), Leiden: Rodopi, 2011, pp. 395-415.

Guillaumin C., Racism, Sexism, Power and Ideology, London and New York: Routledge, 1995.

Habermas J., Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays, translated by Ciaran Cronin, Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2008.

Habermas J., The Future of Human Nature, translated by Hella Beister and Max Pensky, Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2003.

Harris J., Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.

Huxley A., Brave New World. New York: Vintage, 2006.

Jones N., Embodied Ethics: From the Body as Specimen and Spectacle to the Body as Patient, [in:] A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, F. E. Mascia-Lees (ed.), Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, pp. 72-85.

Mukherjee S., The Gene: An Intimate History, New York: Scribner, 2016.

Owens T. J. and S. Samblanet, Self and Self-Concept [in:] Handbook of Social Psychology. Second Edition, J. DeLamater and A. Ward (eds), Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp. 225-250. Pusch A. F., Splices: When Science Catches Up with Science Fiction, “Nanoethics”, 2015, vol. 9, pp. 55-73.

Shelley M., Frankenstein, Seattle: Amazon Classics, 2017.

Sparrow R., A Not-So-New EUGENICS: Harris and Savulescu on Human Enhancement, “The Hastings Center Report”, 2011, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 32-42.

Warkentin T., Dis/Integrating Animals: Ethical Dimensions of the Genetic Engineering of Animals for Human Consumption [in:] Leonardo’s choice: Genetic Technologies and Animals, C. Gigliotti (ed), Dordrecht: Springer, 2009, pp. 151-172.