An interpretative research in the didactic process: critical discourse analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15584/kpe.2019.7.10Keywords:
teaching process, critical discourse analysis, syllabus design, classroom language,, didactic interaction, school organization.Abstract
Roughly speaking, the didactic interaction assumed in any teaching-learning process necessarily needs an internal comprehension and decoding process by the students. Particularly, whenever a teacher develops any teaching process he/she establishes a channel, a code, a system that makes possible communication. In this sense, the language used in the didactic processes is relevant to be analysed as far as it highly contributes to the students’ learning process and enhance to achieve quality and effectiveness. More precisely, the study of language and variety of speech used in education is an area that has aroused great interest and has continued to be studied since the mid twentieth century. In this research we will examine the current theoretical framework and the findings of relevant authors to keep on with the analysis of the language of didactic interaction. Thus, we will restrict our attention to general uses rather than on the analysis of the different linguistic levels. In this paper we will analyse how we use language when teaching, what meanings we convey and how communication is reached in the didactic interaction process.
Downloads
References
Bernat A., La reforma educativa como lenguaje vacío. Actas del VIII Congreso de Lenguajes Naturales y Lenguajes Artificiales, 197–204, 1992.
Broudy H.S., The role of analysis in educational philosophy, “Educational Theory”, XII: 261–269, 1964.
Edel A., Analytic philosophy of education at the crossroad, “Educational Theory”, XXII: 131–153, 1972.
Esteve J.Mª., Lenguaje educativo y teorías pedagógicas, Madrid, Anaya 1979.
Kneller G.F., La lógica y el lenguaje de la educación, Buenos Aires, El Ateneo 1969.
Peters R.S., Etics and Education, Londres, Allen and Unwin 1966.
Ryle G., The Concept of Mind, London, Hutchinson 1949.
Scheffler I., The Language of Education, Illinois, Springfield 1960.
Smith O. & Ennis R.H., Lenguaje y conceptos en educación, Buenos Aires, El Ateneo 1971.
Soler J.R., Estado actual y estrategias para futuribles de la formación a lo largo de la vida, Libro de Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Formación para el Trabajo, 369–379, Zaragoza, Editorial Tornapunta Ediciones 2013.
Soler J.R., La participación social en la construcción de la democracia, reto consustancial a la formación a lo largo de la vida, Madrid, Tornapunta 2009.
Soler R., El poder de las palabras: un análisis del lenguaje pedagógico, Zaragoza, Mira Editores 2015.
Soler R., Lafarga P. & Ramos M., La Competencia Digital de docentes en formación en un contexto educativo de innovación tecnológica. In Hinojo F.J, Aznar I. & Cáceres Mª.P. (eds), Avances en recursos TIC e innovación educativa, 152–161, Madrid, Dykinson 2019.
Yin R., Case study research. Design and methods. Applied social research methods series, Newbury Park CA, Sage 1994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 KULTURA – PRZEMIANY – EDUKACJA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.